Maciosek Michael V, LaFrance Amy B, Dehmer Steven P, McGree Dana A, Flottemesch Thomas J, Xu Zack, Solberg Leif I
HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota
HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Jan;15(1):14-22. doi: 10.1370/afm.2017. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's provisions for first-dollar coverage of evidence-based preventive services have reduced an important barrier to receipt of preventive care. Safety-net providers, however, still serve a substantial uninsured population, and clinician and patient time remain limited in all primary care settings. As a consequence, decision makers continue to set priorities to help focus their efforts. This report updates estimates of relative health impact and cost-effectiveness for evidence-based preventive services.
We assessed the potential impact of 28 evidence-based clinical preventive services in terms of their cost-effectiveness and clinically preventable burden, as measured by quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) saved. Each service received 1 to 5 points on each of the 2 measures-cost-effectiveness and clinically preventable burden-for a total score ranging from 2 to 10. New microsimulation models were used to provide updated estimates of 12 of these services. Priorities for improving delivery rates were established by comparing the ranking with what is known of current delivery rates nationally.
The 3 highest-ranking services, each with a total score of 10, are immunizing children, counseling to prevent tobacco initiation among youth, and tobacco-use screening and brief intervention to encourage cessation among adults. Greatest population health improvement could be obtained from increasing utilization of clinical preventive services that address tobacco use, obesity-related behaviors, and alcohol misuse, as well as colorectal cancer screening and influenza vaccinations.
This study identifies high-priority preventive services and should help decision makers select which services to emphasize in quality-improvement initiatives.
《患者保护与平价医疗法案》中关于循证预防服务首诊覆盖的条款减少了接受预防保健的一个重要障碍。然而,安全网提供者仍服务于大量未参保人群,并且在所有初级保健环境中,临床医生和患者的时间仍然有限。因此,决策者继续确定优先事项以帮助集中精力。本报告更新了循证预防服务相对健康影响和成本效益的估计。
我们评估了28项循证临床预防服务在成本效益和临床可预防负担方面的潜在影响,临床可预防负担通过挽救的质量调整生命年(QALY)来衡量。每项服务在成本效益和临床可预防负担这两项指标上分别获得1至5分,总分范围为2至10分。新的微观模拟模型用于提供其中12项服务的更新估计。通过将排名与全国当前知晓的提供率进行比较,确定了提高提供率的优先事项。
排名最高的三项服务,每项总分均为10分,分别是儿童免疫接种、预防青少年开始吸烟的咨询以及成人烟草使用筛查和简短干预以鼓励戒烟。通过增加对解决烟草使用、肥胖相关行为和酒精滥用以及结直肠癌筛查和流感疫苗接种的临床预防服务的利用,可以实现最大程度的人群健康改善。
本研究确定了高优先级的预防服务,应有助于决策者选择在质量改进举措中强调哪些服务。