Department of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Department of Economics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024 Sep 20;25:e37. doi: 10.1017/S1463423624000318.
Out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC) has emerged as a promising solution to improve efficiency, accessibility, and quality of care and to reduce the strain on emergency departments. As this modality gains traction in diverse healthcare settings, it is increasingly important to fully assess its societal value-for-money and conduct thorough process evaluations. However, current economic evaluations mostly emphasise direct- and short-term effect measures, thus lacking a broader societal perspective.
This study offers a comprehensive overview of current effect measures in OOH-PC evaluations and proposes additional measures from the evaluation of integrated care programmes.
First, we systematically identified the effect measures from published cost-effectiveness studies and classified them as process, outcome, and resource use measures. Second, we elaborate on the incorporation of 'productivity gains', 'health promotion and early intervention', and 'continuity of care' as additional effects into economic evaluations of OOH-PC. Seeking care affects personal and employee time, potentially resulting in decreased productivity. Challenges in taking time off work and limited access to convenient care are often cited as barriers to accessing primary care. As such, OOH-PC can potentially reduce opportunity costs for patients. Furthermore, improving access to healthcare is important in determining whether people receive promotional and preventive services. Health promotion involves empowering people to take control of their health and its determinants. Given the unscheduled nature and the fragmented or rotational care in OOH-PC, the degree to which interventions and modalities provide continuity should be monitored, assessed, and included in economic evaluations. Continuity of care in primary care improves patient satisfaction, promotes adherence to medical advice, reduces reliance on hospitals, and reduces mortality.
Although it is essential to also address local settings and needs, the integration of broader scope measures into OOH-PC economic evaluations improves the comprehensive evaluation that aligns with welfare gains.
非工作时间初级保健(OOH-PC)已成为提高效率、可及性和护理质量、减轻急诊部门压力的一种有前途的解决方案。随着这种模式在不同的医疗保健环境中得到应用,充分评估其社会成本效益并进行全面的过程评估变得越来越重要。然而,当前的经济评估大多强调直接和短期效果措施,因此缺乏更广泛的社会视角。
本研究全面概述了 OOH-PC 评估中的当前效果措施,并从综合护理计划的评估中提出了其他措施。
首先,我们系统地从已发表的成本效益研究中确定了效果措施,并将其分类为过程、结果和资源利用措施。其次,我们详细阐述了将“生产力提高”、“健康促进和早期干预”以及“护理连续性”作为额外效果纳入 OOH-PC 的经济评估中。寻求医疗保健会影响个人和员工的时间,可能导致生产力下降。人们经常提到,由于工作请假的挑战和获得便捷医疗服务的机会有限,他们难以获得初级保健。因此,OOH-PC 可以潜在地降低患者的机会成本。此外,改善医疗保健的可及性对于确定人们是否获得促进和预防性服务很重要。健康促进涉及赋予人们控制自己健康及其决定因素的能力。鉴于 OOH-PC 的非计划性和碎片化或轮班护理性质,应监测、评估并将干预措施和模式提供的连续性纳入经济评估中。初级保健的护理连续性可提高患者满意度、促进对医疗建议的依从性、减少对医院的依赖并降低死亡率。
尽管有必要解决当地的情况和需求,但将更广泛的范围措施纳入 OOH-PC 经济评估中可以提高与福利收益相一致的全面评估。