Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Dig Surg. 2017;34(6):502-506. doi: 10.1159/000458713. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a hybrid approach (HA) versus laparoscopy in reducing the risk of complications related to complex adhesiolysis in incisional ventral hernia repair (IVHR).
This study included 269 adult patients who underwent laparoscopic IVHR at the Oulu University Hospital, Finland during 2006-2012. Baseline, operative and postoperative data was collected and compared between the treatment groups; that is, a comparison was made between the laparoscopic approach (LA, 38 patients) and the hybrid approach (HA, 24 patients).
In the LA group, 11 (28.9%) patients experienced postoperative complications. There were 4 undetected enterotomies that led to major complications, reoperations and one death. In the HA group, 6 (25%) patients experienced mild and moderate complications. During adhesiolysis, 4 enterotomies occurred but were immediately sutured without any complication.
Adhesiolysis through a minimally invasive open technique may be associated with a lower risk of undetected enterotomy in patients with complex adhesions. In IVHR, the hybrid should be considered the operative method of choice when adhesions are foreseeable.
本研究旨在比较杂交手术(HA)与腹腔镜在减少与复杂粘连松解相关的切口疝修补术(IVHR)并发症风险方面的疗效。
本研究纳入了 2006 年至 2012 年期间在芬兰奥卢大学医院接受腹腔镜 IVHR 的 269 例成年患者。收集了两组患者的基线、手术和术后数据,并进行了比较;即比较腹腔镜组(LA,38 例)和杂交组(HA,24 例)。
LA 组 11 例(28.9%)患者术后发生并发症。有 4 例未检出的肠切开术导致严重并发症、再次手术和 1 例死亡。HA 组 6 例(25%)患者出现轻度和中度并发症。在粘连松解过程中发生了 4 例肠切开术,但立即缝合,没有任何并发症。
对于粘连严重的患者,通过微创开放技术进行粘连松解可能与未检出的肠切开术风险较低相关。在 IVHR 中,当粘连可预见时,杂交手术应被视为首选手术方法。