• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

杂交经腹补片修补术治疗切口疝:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Hybrid intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for incisional hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Surgery, Federal University of the Southern Border (Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul), 20 Capitão Araujo St., Passo, Fundo, 99010-121, Brazil.

Division of Surgery, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de), 245 Sarmento Leite St., Porto Alegre, 90050-170, Brazil.

出版信息

Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2055-2067. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03105-w. Epub 2024 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-024-03105-w
PMID:38990230
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic IPOM is technically challenging, especially regarding fascial closure. Hybrid repair has been proposed as a simpler approach. We aimed to compare hybrid and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair (VHR).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of Cochrane, Scopus, and MEDLINE databases to identify studies comparing hybrid versus laparoscopic IPOM VHR reporting the outcomes of recurrence, mortality, seroma, postoperative complications, reoperation, surgical site infection, and operative time. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio 4.1.2 using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

We screened 2,896 articles and fully reviewed 22 of them. A total of five studies, encompassing 664 patients were included. Among them, 337 (50.8%) underwent laparoscopic IPOM. All patients had incisional hernias, with a mean diameter varying from 3 to 12.7 cm, 60% were women, with a mean BMI varying from 29.5 to 38. The hybrid approach had a lower rate of seroma when compared to the laparoscopic (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.92; p = 0.038; I²=78%). We found no difference in recurrence, mortality, postoperative complications, reoperation, surgical site infection, and operative time between groups.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid IPOM is a safe and effective method for incisional hernia repair. Moreover, it facilitates fascial defect closure and decreases postoperative seromas.

摘要

简介

腹腔镜 IPOM 技术难度大,尤其是在筋膜闭合方面。已经提出了混合修复作为一种更简单的方法。我们旨在比较接受腹疝修复 (VHR) 的患者中混合修复与腹腔镜腹膜内补片修补术 (IPOM) 的效果。

方法

我们对 Cochrane、Scopus 和 MEDLINE 数据库进行了系统评价,以确定比较混合与腹腔镜 IPOM VHR 报告复发、死亡率、血清肿、术后并发症、再次手术、手术部位感染和手术时间的研究。使用 RStudio 4.1.2 使用随机效应模型进行统计分析。

结果

我们筛选了 2896 篇文章,并对其中 22 篇进行了全面审查。共有五项研究,包括 664 名患者被纳入。其中,337 名(50.8%)患者接受了腹腔镜 IPOM。所有患者均患有切口疝,平均直径为 3 至 12.7cm,60%为女性,平均 BMI 为 29.5 至 38。与腹腔镜组相比,混合组血清肿发生率较低(OR 0.22;95%CI 0.05 至 0.92;p=0.038;I²=78%)。我们没有发现两组在复发、死亡率、术后并发症、再次手术、手术部位感染和手术时间方面存在差异。

结论

混合 IPOM 是一种安全有效的切口疝修复方法。此外,它有助于筋膜缺损闭合并减少术后血清肿。

相似文献

1
Hybrid intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for incisional hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.杂交经腹补片修补术治疗切口疝:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2055-2067. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03105-w. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
2
Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) with fascial repair (IPOM-plus) for ventral and incisional hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜腹腔内补片修补术(IPOM)联合筋膜修复术(IPOM-plus)治疗腹疝和切口疝:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Apr;28(2):385-400. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02983-4. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
3
Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh with peritoneal bridging.使用带腹膜桥接的腹腔内置片修补术进行腹腔镜腹侧和切口疝修补术
Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):635-646. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02502-9. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
4
Comparison of two fascial defect closure methods for laparoscopic incisional hernia repair.两种筋膜缺损闭合方法在腹腔镜切口疝修补术中的比较。
Hernia. 2022 Jun;26(3):945-951. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02443-3. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
5
Closure versus non-closure of fascial defects in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repairs: a review of the literature.腹腔镜下腹壁和切口疝修补术中筋膜缺损的闭合与非闭合:文献综述
Surg Today. 2016 Jul;46(7):764-73. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1219-y. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
6
Is fascial defect closure with intraperitoneal onlay mesh superior to standard intraperitoneal onlay mesh for laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernia?对于腹腔镜修补大型切口疝,采用腹腔内置入补片并封闭筋膜缺损的方法是否优于标准的腹腔内置入补片法?
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2018 Nov;11(4):378-384. doi: 10.1111/ases.12471. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
7
Comparison of Mesh Fixation Techniques in Elective Laparoscopic Repair of Incisional Hernia-ReliaTack™ v ProTack™ (TACKoMesh) - A double-blind randomised controlled trial.择期腹腔镜切口疝修补术中Mesh固定技术的比较——ReliaTack™与ProTack™(TACKoMesh)——一项双盲随机对照试验。
BMC Surg. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0378-3.
8
Laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA) technique versus intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM plus) for ventral hernia repair: a comparative analysis.腹腔镜下腹直肌前鞘修补术(LIRA)与腹腔内补片加强(IPOM plus)治疗腹壁疝的比较分析。
Hernia. 2024 Feb;28(1):167-177. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02858-0. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
9
Robotic-assisted ventral and incisional hernia repair with hernia defect closure and intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) experience.机器人辅助腹侧和切口疝修补术,包括疝缺损闭合和腹膜内补片植入(IPOM)经验。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Oct;14(5):695-701. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01040-y. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
10
Postoperative complications as an independent risk factor for recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study of 417 patients with long-term follow-up.术后并发症作为腹腔镜腹疝修补术后复发的独立危险因素:一项对417例患者进行长期随访的前瞻性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1469-1477. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5140-2. Epub 2016 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparosocpic "Intraperitoneal Underlay Mesh"-Plus: A Viable Approach for Incisional-Ventral Hernia Repair.腹腔镜“腹腔内补片下层修补术”加:一种可行的切口疝修补方法。
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Jun 18;4:14459. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14459. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a 5-10-year follow-up of the randomized controlled multicenter study.腹腔镜与杂交技术治疗切口疝的比较:一项 5-10 年的随机对照多中心研究随访。
Hernia. 2024 Feb;28(1):191-197. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02849-1. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
2
The incidence and impact of enterotomy during laparoscopic and robotic ventral hernia repair: a nationwide readmissions analysis.腹腔镜和机器人腹疝修补术中肠切开的发生率和影响:全国再入院分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6385-6394. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09867-1. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
3
Drain placement in retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
腹横筋膜后入路修补术时引流管的放置:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2023 Jun;27(3):519-526. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02792-1. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
4
Ventral hernia repair: an increasing burden affecting abdominal core health.腹壁疝修补术:影响腹核心健康的日益加重的负担。
Hernia. 2023 Apr;27(2):415-421. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02707-6. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
5
Long-term outcomes of seromas after ventral hernia repair: a propensity score-matched analysis of the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative.腹疝修补术后血清肿的长期结局:腹部核心健康质量协作的倾向评分匹配分析。
Hernia. 2023 Apr;27(2):373-378. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02613-x. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
6
Outcomes and complications of open, laparoscopic, and hybrid giant ventral hernia repair.开放手术、腹腔镜手术及杂交手术治疗巨大腹侧疝的疗效与并发症
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jan 7;10(1):51-61. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i1.51.
7
Open Versus Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial.开放手术与腹腔镜下腹疝修补术:一项随机临床试验
Cureus. 2021 Dec 17;13(12):e20490. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20490. eCollection 2021 Dec.
8
Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh with peritoneal bridging.使用带腹膜桥接的腹腔内置片修补术进行腹腔镜腹侧和切口疝修补术
Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):635-646. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02502-9. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
9
Hybrid operation technique for incisional hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of intra- and postoperative complications.杂交手术技术治疗切口疝修补术:一项关于术中及术后并发症的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2021 Dec;25(6):1459-1469. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02497-3. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
10
Comparison of two fascial defect closure methods for laparoscopic incisional hernia repair.两种筋膜缺损闭合方法在腹腔镜切口疝修补术中的比较。
Hernia. 2022 Jun;26(3):945-951. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02443-3. Epub 2021 Jul 23.