Mears Kim, Bandy Sandra L
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Apr;105(2):145-149. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.208.
BACKGROUND: The role of health sciences librarians has expanded in the scholarly communications landscape as a result of the increase in federal public access mandates and the continued expansion of publishing avenues. This has created the need to investigate whether academic health sciences libraries should have scholarly communications positions to provide education and services exclusively related to scholarly communication topics. METHODS: A nine-question online survey was distributed through the Association of Academic Health Sciences Libraries (AAHSL) email discussion list to gather preliminary findings from and opinions of directors of health sciences libraries on the need for scholarly communications positions. RESULTS: The survey received a 38% response rate. The authors found that AAHSL members are currently providing scholarly communications services, and 46% of respondents expressed the need to devote a full-time position to this role. DISCUSSION: Our survey reveals a juxtaposition occurring in AAHSL member libraries. While administrators acknowledge the need to provide scholarly communications services, they often experience budget challenges in providing a full-time position for these services.
背景:由于联邦公共获取授权的增加以及出版途径的持续扩展,健康科学图书馆员在学术交流领域的作用得到了扩展。这就产生了调查学术健康科学图书馆是否应设立专门负责提供与学术交流主题相关教育和服务的学术交流岗位的需求。 方法:通过学术健康科学图书馆协会(AAHSL)电子邮件讨论列表分发了一份包含九个问题的在线调查问卷,以收集健康科学图书馆馆长对于设立学术交流岗位的初步调查结果和意见。 结果:该调查的回复率为38%。作者发现,AAHSL成员目前正在提供学术交流服务,46%的受访者表示需要为此设立一个全职岗位。 讨论:我们的调查揭示了AAHSL成员图书馆中存在的一种矛盾情况。虽然管理人员承认有必要提供学术交流服务,但他们在为这些服务设立全职岗位时往往面临预算挑战。
Health Info Libr J. 2010-3
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022-1-1
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1991-4
Health Info Libr J. 2022-12
Med Ref Serv Q. 2020
J Med Libr Assoc. 2019-1
J Med Libr Assoc. 2013-10