Suppr超能文献

厄勒布鲁肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷各子集对慢性下腰痛患者恢复工作的预测价值。

The predictive value of subsets of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire for return to work in chronic low back pain.

作者信息

Opsommer Emmanuelle, Rivier Gilles, Crombez Geert, Hilfiker Roger

机构信息

School of Health Sciences (HESAV), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO), Lausanne, Switzerland -

Clinique Romande de Réadaptation SUVAcare, Sion, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Jun;53(3):359-365. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04398-2. Epub 2017 Apr 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that positive recovery expectations are associated with positive health outcomes in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) such as return to work (RTW) and the time to RTW.

AIM

To compare the predictive value for RTW in CLBP using different subsets of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (ÖMPSQ).

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort study.

SETTING

Rehabilitation center.

POPULATION

Ninety-eight inpatients with CLBP (>3 months).

METHODS

The ÖMPSQ at baseline was used to predict RTW three months after discharge from the rehabilitation clinic. The area under the ROC-curve was calculated based on a logistic regression model. Cox-regression was used to analyze time to RTW with C statistics for the original full (25-items) version of the ÖMPSQ, the 10-item version as well as for the two items about self-expected RTW and self-expected recovery.

RESULTS

The area under the curve (AUC) for the overall score of the full version ÖMPSQ was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73 to 0.90), the AUC for the short version was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.70 to 0.88), the AUC for the item about self-expected recovery (#15) was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.57 to 0.78), and the AUC for the item about self-expected RTW (#16) was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.66 to 0.85). Harrell's C for the full version was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.66 to 0.81), for the short version the C was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.64 to 0.79), for item #15 the C was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.53 to 0.72), and for item #16 the C was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.64 to 0.78).

CONCLUSIONS

Two items about expectations from the ÖMPSQ showed similar predictive value for RTW compared to the short and full original versions, and could be used as first screening questions.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

Clinicians may make an informed choice whether they use the full or the short version of the ÖMPSQ for screening of psychosocial problems, or whether they use the two single items about expectations. Knowledge about patient's expectations provides a base for discussion between health professionals and the patient.

摘要

背景

研究表明,积极的康复期望与慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者的良好健康结局相关,如重返工作岗位(RTW)及RTW所需时间。

目的

比较使用Örebro肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷(ÖMPSQ)不同子集对CLBP患者RTW的预测价值。

设计

纵向队列研究。

地点

康复中心。

研究对象

98例CLBP住院患者(病程>3个月)。

方法

使用基线时的ÖMPSQ预测康复诊所出院3个月后的RTW情况。基于逻辑回归模型计算ROC曲线下面积。采用Cox回归分析ÖMPSQ原始完整版(25项)、10项版以及关于自我预期RTW和自我预期康复的两项内容的RTW时间,并计算C统计量。

结果

完整版ÖMPSQ总分的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.82(95%CI:0.73至0.90),简短版的AUC为0.79(95%CI:0.70至0.88),关于自我预期康复的项目(第15项)的AUC为0.67(95%CI:0.57至0.78),关于自我预期RTW的项目(第16项)的AUC为0.76(95%CI:0.66至0.85)。完整版的Harrell's C为0.74(95%CI:0.66至0.81),简短版的C为0.71(95%CI:0.64至0.79),第15项的C为0.62(95%CI:0.53至0.72),第16项的C为0.71(95%CI:0.64至0.78)。

结论

与原始简短版和完整版相比,ÖMPSQ中关于预期的两项内容对RTW显示出相似的预测价值,可作为初步筛查问题。

临床康复意义

临床医生在选择使用完整版还是简短版ÖMPSQ进行心理社会问题筛查,或是否使用关于预期的两项单项内容时可以做出明智的选择。了解患者的期望为健康专业人员与患者之间的讨论提供了基础。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验