Suppr超能文献

预测与脊柱疼痛相关的工作残疾:对最具临床相关性工具的系统评价

Predicting Work Disability Related to Spinal Pain: A Systematic Review of the Most Clinically Relevant Tools.

作者信息

Gerard Thomas, Lachance Pierre-Luc, Rabey Martin, Tousignant-Laflamme Yannick

机构信息

School of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001 12e avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5 N4, Canada.

Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CRCHUS), Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.

出版信息

J Occup Rehabil. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1007/s10926-025-10294-3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Musculoskeletal disorders, especially spinal conditions, are leading causes of disability, contributing significantly to work absenteeism and socio-economic burden. Rehabilitation is essential for promoting sustainable return to work (RTW). However, clinicians need reliable tools with appropriate psychometric properties to determine patients' risk of persistent work disability and tailor interventions. This systematic review objectives were to (1) identify clinically useful questionnaires that enable clinicians to identify individuals with spinal pain (back or neck pain) at risk of work disability, and (2) document the psychometric properties of the identified questionnaires.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in three databases from inception to 01/10/2025, to retrieve relevant studies. Studies were included if they reported self-administered questionnaires with ≤ 15 items predicting RTW outcomes in spinal disorders. Tools were evaluated based on psychometric properties (calibration, discrimination), and pragmatic characteristics (number of items, readability).

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were retrieved including 16 unique questionnaires of which four demonstrated sufficient discrimination capability. From these, the Örebro musculoskeletal pain questionnaire 10-items (ÖMPQ- 10), STarT Back screening tool (SBST), and a single item from the ÖMPQ- 25 demonstrated acceptable to excellent discrimination for low back pain populations, but showed lower discrimination for mixed or neck pain populations.

CONCLUSION

The SBST, ÖMPQ- 10, and single items from the ÖMPQ- 25 performed best in predicting RTW outcomes for low back pain. No questionnaire had sufficient discriminatory capability for neck pain. These results should be interpreted with caution, as the overall risk of bias assessment remains unclear for the OMPQ- 10 and high for the SBST. Further research is necessary to develop or validate tools specific to neck pain and mixed populations.

摘要

目的

肌肉骨骼疾病,尤其是脊柱疾病,是导致残疾的主要原因,对旷工和社会经济负担有重大影响。康复对于促进可持续重返工作岗位(RTW)至关重要。然而,临床医生需要具有适当心理测量特性的可靠工具来确定患者持续工作残疾的风险并制定干预措施。本系统评价的目的是:(1)识别临床上有用的问卷,使临床医生能够识别有工作残疾风险的脊柱疼痛(背痛或颈痛)个体;(2)记录所识别问卷的心理测量特性。

方法

从数据库建立至2025年10月1日在三个数据库中进行系统检索,以检索相关研究。如果研究报告了预测脊柱疾病RTW结果的≤15项自填问卷,则纳入研究。根据心理测量特性(校准、辨别力)和实用特性(项目数量、可读性)对工具进行评估。

结果

检索到17项研究,包括16种独特的问卷,其中4种表现出足够的辨别能力。其中,厄勒布鲁肌肉骨骼疼痛问卷10项(ÖMPQ-10)、STarT Back筛查工具(SBST)以及ÖMPQ-25中的一个单项对腰痛人群的辨别能力为可接受至优秀,但对混合性或颈痛人群的辨别能力较低。

结论

SBST、ÖMPQ-10以及ÖMPQ-25中的单项在预测腰痛的RTW结果方面表现最佳。没有问卷对颈痛具有足够的辨别能力。这些结果应谨慎解释,因为ÖMPQ-10的总体偏倚风险评估仍不明确,而SBST的偏倚风险较高。有必要进行进一步研究以开发或验证针对颈痛和混合人群的特定工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验