Division of Respiratory Rehabilitation, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, IRCCS, Lumezzane, Brescia, Italy -
Don Gnocchi Foundation, S. Maria Nascente Institute for Research and Care, Milan, Italy.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Dec;53(6):892-899. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04511-7. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
In patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is usually initiated in an in-hospital regime.
We investigated if NIV initiated in an outpatient setting can be as effective in terms of patients' acceptance/adherence. We also evaluated factors predicting NIV acceptance and adherence and disease progression.
Prospective randomized study.
Outpatient versus inpatient rehabilitation.
ALS patients.
ALS patients were randomized to two groups for NIV initiation: outpatients versus inpatients. At baseline (T0), end of NIV trial program (T1) and after 3 months from T1 (T2), respiratory function tests, blood gas analysis, and sleep study were performed. At T1, we assessed: NIV acceptance (>4 h/night), and dyspnea symptoms (day/night) by Visual analogue scale (VAS), staff and patients' experience (how difficult NIV was to accept, how difficult ventilator was to manage, satisfaction); at T2: NIV adherence (>120 h/month) and patients' experience.
Fifty patients participated. There were no differences in acceptance failure (P=0.733) or adherence failure (P=0.529). At T1, outpatients had longer hours of nocturnal ventilation (P<0.02), at T2 this was similar (P=0.34). Female gender and spinal onset of the disease were predictors for NIV acceptance/adherence failure. There were no between-group differences in progression of respiratory impairment, symptoms and sleep quality.
Early outpatient initiation of NIV in ALS is as effective as inpatient initiation.
在肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者中,通常在住院期间开始进行无创通气(NIV)。
我们研究了在门诊环境中启动 NIV 是否在患者的接受度/依从性方面同样有效。我们还评估了预测 NIV 接受度和依从性以及疾病进展的因素。
前瞻性随机研究。
门诊与住院康复。
ALS 患者。
将 ALS 患者随机分为两组进行 NIV 启动:门诊与住院。在基线(T0)、NIV 试验计划结束时(T1)和 T1 后 3 个月(T2)进行呼吸功能测试、血气分析和睡眠研究。在 T1,我们评估了:通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估 NIV 接受度(>4 小时/晚)和呼吸困难症状(白天/夜间),评估工作人员和患者的体验(接受 NIV 的难易程度、呼吸机管理的难易程度、满意度);在 T2:评估 NIV 依从性(>120 小时/月)和患者体验。
共有 50 名患者参与。接受度失败(P=0.733)或依从性失败(P=0.529)无差异。在 T1,门诊患者夜间通气时间更长(P<0.02),在 T2 时相似(P=0.34)。女性性别和疾病的脊髓发病是 NIV 接受度/依从性失败的预测因素。在呼吸功能损害、症状和睡眠质量的进展方面,两组之间没有差异。
在 ALS 中早期门诊启动 NIV 与住院启动同样有效。