• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

战场疼痛管理:以17年以色列国防军视角

Battlefield pain management: A view of 17 years in Israel Defense Forces.

作者信息

Benov Avi, Salas Margaux M, Nakar Helit, Antebi Ben, Tarif Bader, Yitzhak Avraham, Glassberg Elon

机构信息

From the Israel Defense (B.A., T.B., Y.A., G.E.) Forces-Medical Corps (IDF-MC), Ramat Gan; Department of Surgery "A", Meir Medical Center (B.A.), Kfar Saba and the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel; USA Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA (S.M.M.), Fort Sam Houston, Texas; and Department of Military Medicine (TB), Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jul;83(1 Suppl 1):S150-S155. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001481.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000001481
PMID:28383472
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pain control in trauma is an integral part of treatment in combat casualty care (CCC). More soldiers injured on the battlefield will need analgesics for pain than those who will need lifesaving interventions (LSI). It has been shown that early treatment of pain improves outcomes after traumatic injury, whereas inadequate treatment leads to higher rates of PTSD. The purpose of this article is to report the Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps (IDF-MC) experience with point of injury (POI) use of analgesia.

METHODS

All cases documented in the IDF Trauma Registry (ITR) between January 1997 and December 2014 were examined. All cases of POI pain medications were extracted. Data collection included mechanism of injury, wound distribution, pain medication administered, mortality, and provider type.

RESULTS

Of 8,576 patients, 1,056 (12.3%) patients who had at least one documented pain management treatment were included in this study. Demographics of the study population included 94.2% men and 5.8% women with a median age of 21 years. Injury mechanisms included 40.3% blast injuries (n = 426) and 29% gunshot injuries (306). Of 1,513 injured body regions reported, 52% (787) were extremity wounds (upper and lower), 23% (353) were truncal wounds, and 17.7% (268) were head and neck injuries. A total of 1,469 episodes of analgesic treatment were reported. The most common types of analgesics were morphine (74.7%, 1,097 episodes), ketamine (9.6%, 141 episodes), and fentanyl (13.6%, 200 episodes). Of the patients, 39% (413) received more than one type of analgesic. In 90.5% of cases, analgesia was administered by a physician or a paramedic. Over the span of the study period (1997-2014), types of analgesics given by providers at POI had changed, as fentanyl was introduced to providers. A total of 801 LSIs were performed on 379 (35.9%) patients receiving analgesia, and no adverse events were found in any of the casualties.

CONCLUSION

Most casualties at POI did not receive any analgesics while on the battlefield. The most common analgesics administered at POI were opioids and the most common route of administration was intravenously. This study provides evidence that over time analgesic administration has gained acceptance and has been more common place on the battlefield. Increasingly, more casualties are receiving pain management treatment early in CCC along with LSIs. We hope that this shift will impact CCC by reducing PTSD and overall morbidity resulting from inadequate management of acute pain.

摘要

背景

创伤疼痛控制是战斗伤员护理(CCC)治疗的一个组成部分。在战场上受伤的士兵中,需要镇痛药物止痛的人数比需要救命干预措施(LSI)的人数更多。研究表明,创伤后早期疼痛治疗可改善预后,而治疗不充分会导致创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)发生率升高。本文旨在报告以色列国防军医疗队(IDF-MC)在受伤点(POI)使用镇痛药物的经验。

方法

对1997年1月至2014年12月以色列国防军创伤登记处(ITR)记录的所有病例进行检查。提取所有POI使用止痛药物的病例。数据收集包括损伤机制、伤口分布、使用的止痛药物、死亡率和提供者类型。

结果

在8576例患者中,本研究纳入了1056例(12.3%)至少有一次记录在案的疼痛管理治疗的患者。研究人群的人口统计学特征包括94.2%为男性,5.8%为女性,中位年龄为21岁。损伤机制包括40.3%的爆炸伤(n = 426)和29%的枪伤(306)。在报告的1513个受伤身体部位中,52%(787)为四肢伤口(上肢和下肢),23%(353)为躯干伤口,17.7%(268)为头部和颈部损伤。共报告了1469次镇痛治疗。最常用的镇痛药物类型为吗啡(74.7%,1097次)、氯胺酮(9.6%,141次)和芬太尼(13.6%,200次)。在这些患者中,39%(413)接受了不止一种类型的镇痛药物。在90.5%的病例中,镇痛由医生或护理人员实施。在研究期间(1997 - 2014年),POI处提供者给予的镇痛药物类型发生了变化,因为芬太尼被引入供提供者使用。对379例(35.9%)接受镇痛治疗的患者进行了总共801次LSIs,未在任何伤员中发现不良事件。

结论

大多数POI处的伤员在战场上未接受任何镇痛药物。POI处最常用的镇痛药物为阿片类药物,最常用的给药途径为静脉注射。本研究提供的证据表明,随着时间推移,镇痛药物的使用已得到认可,在战场上更为常见。越来越多的伤员在CCC早期与LSIs一起接受疼痛管理治疗。我们希望这种转变将通过减少急性疼痛管理不充分导致的PTSD和总体发病率来影响CCC。

相似文献

1
Battlefield pain management: A view of 17 years in Israel Defense Forces.战场疼痛管理:以17年以色列国防军视角
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jul;83(1 Suppl 1):S150-S155. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001481.
2
Trends in prehospital pain management: two decades of point-of-injury care.创伤后疼痛管理趋势:二十年的伤处治疗。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2022 Sep;24(9):584-590.
3
Trends in prehospital pain management following the introduction of new clinical practice guidelines.新临床实践指南出台后,院前疼痛管理的趋势。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Aug 1;91(2S Suppl 2):S206-S212. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003287.
4
Prehospital Analgesia for Pediatric Trauma Patients in Iraq and Afghanistan.伊拉克和阿富汗儿科创伤患者的院前镇痛
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018 Sep-Oct;22(5):608-613. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1428839. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
5
Use of ketamine for prehospital pain control on the battlefield: A systematic review.战场现场使用氯胺酮进行院前疼痛控制:系统评价。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Jan;88(1):180-185. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002522.
6
Augmentation of point of injury care: Reducing battlefield mortality-The IDF experience.增强伤处护理:降低战场死亡率——以色列国防军的经验
Injury. 2016 May;47(5):993-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.078. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
7
Prehospital pain medication use by U.S. Forces in Afghanistan.美国军队在阿富汗的院前疼痛药物使用情况。
Mil Med. 2015 Mar;180(3):304-9. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00257.
8
Pain management for casualties receiving lifesaving interventions in the prehospital scenario: Raising awareness of our human nature.创伤急救中生命支持干预下伤员的疼痛管理:提高对人性的认识。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Aug 1;91(2S Suppl 2):S201-S205. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003295.
9
Analysis of Prehospital Documentation of Injury-Related Pain Assessment and Analgesic Administration on the Contemporary Battlefield.当代战场上院前损伤相关疼痛评估与镇痛给药记录分析
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016;20(1):37-44. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1051683.
10
Military medical research in the IDF: an array of fields and interests.以色列国防军的军事医学研究:领域广泛,兴趣多样。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2022 Sep;24(9):557-558.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors that influence the administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) to trauma patients in prehospital settings: a systematic review.影响创伤患者在院前环境下使用氨甲环酸(TXA)的因素:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 31;13(5):e073075. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073075.
2
Nasal nalbuphine analgesia in prehospital trauma managed by first-responder personnel on ski slopes in Switzerland: an observational cohort study.瑞士滑雪道上由第一响应人员管理的创伤前鼻内纳布啡镇痛:一项观察性队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Feb 17;29(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00852-y.
3
Ketamine Administration in Prehospital Combat Injured Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A 10-Year Report of Survival.
院前创伤性脑损伤战斗伤员的氯胺酮给药:10年生存报告
Cureus. 2020 Jul 17;12(7):e9248. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9248.