• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氯己定和普罗碘铵滴眼剂的眼科毒性体外评价。

In Vitro Evaluation of the Ophthalmic Toxicity Profile of Chlorhexidine and Propamidine Isethionate Eye Drops.

机构信息

1 Department Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Santiago de Compostela (USC) , Santiago de Compostela, Spain .

2 Department of Pharmacy, Xerencia de Xestión Integrada de Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS) , Santiago de Compostela, Spain .

出版信息

J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Apr;33(3):202-209. doi: 10.1089/jop.2016.0053.

DOI:10.1089/jop.2016.0053
PMID:28384032
Abstract

PURPOSE

Acanthamoeba keratitis causes frequent epithelial lesions that fully expose the corneal stroma. The aim of this study was to determine the toxic profile of chlorhexidine and propamidine eye drops.

METHODS

We used primary human keratocytes in cell culture in combination with a novel technology that evaluates dynamic real-time cytotoxicity through impedance analysis. Additional studies such as a classic cell viability test (WST-1), a bovine corneal opacity and permeability assay, and an irritation eye study (Hen's Egg Test [HET]) have been made.

RESULTS

Both eye drop formulations showed a time- and concentration-dependent toxicity profile, in which long periods and high concentrations were more detrimental to cells. In prolonged times of exposure, propamidine is more harmful to cells than chlorhexidine. On the contrary, no irritation has been detected in using the HET-chorioallantoic membrane test and no alterations in the corneal transparency nor permeability was produced by the treatment with both eye drops.

CONCLUSIONS

In culture assay, chlorhexidine eye drops have proven to be less cytotoxic than Brolene for a long contact period of time, but no signs of irritation or alterations in transparency or permeability have been observed in the cornea after both treatments.

摘要

目的

棘阿米巴角膜炎常导致角膜上皮完全暴露于基质层的病变。本研究旨在确定洗必泰与丙脒定滴眼液的毒性特征。

方法

我们在细胞培养中使用原代人角膜基质细胞,并结合一种通过阻抗分析评估动态实时细胞毒性的新技术。还进行了其他研究,如经典细胞活力测试(WST-1)、牛眼角膜混浊和通透性测定以及眼部刺激性研究(鸡胚绒毛尿囊膜试验[HET])。

结果

两种滴眼液均呈现出时间和浓度依赖性的毒性特征,其中长时间和高浓度对细胞的危害性更大。在长时间暴露的情况下,丙脒定对细胞的危害性大于洗必泰。相反,HET-鸡胚绒毛尿囊膜试验未检测到刺激性,两种滴眼液处理后角膜的透明度和通透性均未发生改变。

结论

在培养物检测中,与 Brolene 相比,洗必泰滴眼液在长时间接触时的细胞毒性更小,但两种处理后角膜均未出现刺激迹象或透明度或通透性改变。

相似文献

1
In Vitro Evaluation of the Ophthalmic Toxicity Profile of Chlorhexidine and Propamidine Isethionate Eye Drops.氯己定和普罗碘铵滴眼剂的眼科毒性体外评价。
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Apr;33(3):202-209. doi: 10.1089/jop.2016.0053.
2
In vitro assessment of the cytotoxicity of anti-allergic eye drops using 5 cultured corneal and conjunctival cell lines.使用5种培养的角膜和结膜细胞系对抗过敏眼药水的细胞毒性进行体外评估。
J Oleo Sci. 2011;60(3):139-44. doi: 10.5650/jos.60.139.
3
In vitro amoebicidal activity of propamidine and pentamidine isethionate against Acanthamoeba species and toxicity to corneal tissues.喷他脒和乙磺半胱氨酸喷他脒对棘阿米巴属的体外杀阿米巴活性及对角膜组织的毒性。
Cornea. 1997 Jan;16(1):94-100.
4
The reculture technique: individualizing the treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis.再培养技术:个性化治疗棘阿米巴角膜炎
Cornea. 2000 Jul;19(4):464-7. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200007000-00011.
5
The Effect of Antiamoebic Agents on Viability, Proliferation and Migration of Human Epithelial Cells, Keratocytes and Endothelial Cells, In Vitro.抗阿米巴药物对人上皮细胞、角膜细胞和内皮细胞活力、增殖及迁移的体外影响。
Curr Eye Res. 2018 Jun;43(6):725-733. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1447674. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
6
Ocular safety comparison of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory eye drops used in pseudophakic cystoid macular edema prevention.用于预防人工晶状体眼黄斑囊样水肿的非甾体类抗炎眼药水的眼部安全性比较
Int J Pharm. 2015 Nov 30;495(2):680-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.09.058. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
7
Successful medical therapy of Acanthamoeba keratitis with topical chlorhexidine and propamidine.局部使用洗必泰和丙脒腙成功治疗棘阿米巴角膜炎
Eye (Lond). 1996;10 ( Pt 4):413-21. doi: 10.1038/eye.1996.92.
8
Critical appraisal of alternative irritation models: three decades of testing ophthalmic pharmaceuticals.替代刺激模型的批判性评估:眼科药物三十年的测试
Br Med Bull. 2015 Mar;113(1):59-71. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldv002. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
9
Eye irritation of low-irritant cosmetic formulations: correlation of in vitro results with clinical data and product composition.低刺激性化妆品配方的眼部刺激性:体外试验结果与临床数据及产品成分的相关性
Food Chem Toxicol. 2005 Jan;43(1):155-65. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.09.004.
10
A nanoparticle formulation reduces the corneal toxicity of indomethacin eye drops and enhances its corneal permeability.一种纳米颗粒制剂可降低吲哚美辛滴眼液的角膜毒性并增强其角膜通透性。
Toxicology. 2014 May 7;319:53-62. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2014.02.012. Epub 2014 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Rose Bengal penetration in human corneas using iontophoresis.采用离子导入法增强玫瑰红 Bengal 在人眼角膜中的渗透。
Ther Deliv. 2024;15(8):567-575. doi: 10.1080/20415990.2024.2371778. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
2
Amoebicidal activity of cationic carbosilane dendrons derived with 4-phenylbutyric acid against Acanthamoeba griffini and Acanthamoeba polyphaga trophozoites and cysts.含 4-苯丁酸的阳离子碳硅烷树枝状分子的杀阿米巴活性对棘阿米巴原虫和棘阿米巴多形虫滋养体和包囊的作用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 2;12(1):14926. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19200-w.
3
Keratitis-Review of Current Treatment Possibilities.
角膜炎——当前治疗方法综述
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 23;10(23):5468. doi: 10.3390/jcm10235468.
4
Evaluation of in vitro activity of five antimicrobial agents on Acanthamoeba isolates and their toxicity on human corneal epithelium.评价五种抗菌药物对棘阿米巴分离株的体外活性及其对人眼角膜上皮细胞的毒性。
Eye (Lond). 2022 Oct;36(10):1911-1917. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01768-8. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
5
Development and Characterization of a Tacrolimus/Hydroxypropyl-β-Cyclodextrin Eye Drop.他克莫司/羟丙基-β-环糊精滴眼液的研制与特性研究
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Jan 23;13(2):149. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13020149.
6
Safety and Tolerability of an Eye Drop Based on 0.6% Povidone-Iodine Nanoemulsion in Dry Eye Patients.载碘纳米乳滴眼剂治疗干眼症的安全性和耐受性。
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Mar;37(2):90-96. doi: 10.1089/jop.2020.0085. Epub 2020 Dec 23.