Department of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Department of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;3(9):1222-1227. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0324.
Although oral metronomic chemotherapy is often used in progressive pediatric solid malignant tumors, a literature review reveals that only small single-arm retrospective or phase 1 and 2 studies have been performed. Skepticism abounds because of the lack of level 1 evidence.
To compare the effect of metronomic chemotherapy on progression-free survival (PFS) with that of placebo in pediatric patients with primary extracranial, nonhematopoietic solid malignant tumors that progress after at least 2 lines of chemotherapy.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted from October 1, 2013, through December 31, 2015, at the cancer center at All India Institute of Medical Sciences in children aged 5 to 18 years with primary extracranial, nonhematopoietic solid malignant tumors that progressed after at least 2 lines of chemotherapy and had no further curative options.
One arm received a 4-drug oral metronomic regimen of daily celecoxib and thalidomide with alternating periods of etoposide and cyclophosphamide, whereas the other arm received placebo. Disease status was assessed at baseline, 9 weeks, 18 weeks, and 27 weeks or at clinical progression.
The primary end point was PFS as defined by the proportion of patients without disease progression at 6 months, and PFS duration and overall survival (OS) were secondary end points.
A total of 108 of the 123 patients screened were enrolled, with 52 randomized to the placebo group (median age, 15 years; 40 male [76.9%]) and 56 to the metronomic chemotherapy group (median age, 13 years; 42 male [75.0%]). At a median follow-up of 2.9 months, 100% of the patients had disease progression by 6 months in the placebo group vs 96.4% in the metronomic chemotherapy group (P = .24). Median PFS and OS in the 2 groups was similar (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.47-1.03 [P = .07] for PFS; and HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.50-1.09 [P = .13] for OS). In post hoc subgroup analysis, cohorts receiving more than 3 cycles (HR for PFS, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.23-0.93; P = .03) and those without a bone sarcoma (ie, neither primitive neuroectodermal tumor nor osteosarcoma) (HR for PFS, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.81; P = .01) appeared to benefit from metronomic chemotherapy.
Metronomic chemotherapy does not improve 6-month PFS, compared with placebo, among pediatric patients with extracranial progressive solid malignant tumors . However, patients without bone sarcoma and those able to tolerate therapy for more than 3 cycles (9 weeks) benefit.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01858571.
重要性:虽然口服节拍化疗常用于进展期小儿实体恶性肿瘤,但文献综述显示,仅有少量小单臂回顾性或 1 期和 2 期研究进行过。由于缺乏 1 级证据,人们对此持怀疑态度。
目的:比较节拍化疗与安慰剂在至少经过 2 线化疗后进展的儿童原发性颅外非造血性实体恶性肿瘤患者中的无进展生存期(PFS)的疗效。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项双盲、安慰剂对照的随机临床试验,于 2013 年 10 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日在全印度医学科学研究所的癌症中心进行,纳入年龄 5 至 18 岁、至少接受过 2 线化疗且无进一步治愈选择的原发性颅外非造血性实体恶性肿瘤且进展的儿童患者。
干预措施:一组接受每日塞来昔布和沙利度胺联合依托泊苷和环磷酰胺交替周期的 4 种药物口服节拍化疗方案,另一组接受安慰剂。在基线、9 周、18 周和 27 周或临床进展时评估疾病状态。
主要终点和次要终点:主要终点是 6 个月时无疾病进展患者的比例定义的 PFS,次要终点是 PFS 持续时间和总生存期(OS)。
结果:共筛选了 123 名患者,其中 108 名患者入组,52 名患者随机分配至安慰剂组(中位年龄 15 岁;40 名男性[76.9%]),56 名患者随机分配至节拍化疗组(中位年龄 13 岁;42 名男性[75.0%])。中位随访 2.9 个月时,安慰剂组 100%的患者在 6 个月时疾病进展,而节拍化疗组为 96.4%(P=0.24)。两组的中位 PFS 和 OS 相似(风险比[HR],0.69;95%CI,0.47-1.03[P=0.07];HR,0.74;95%CI,0.50-1.09[P=0.13])。在事后亚组分析中,接受超过 3 个周期(PFS 的 HR,0.46;95%CI,0.23-0.93;P=0.03)和无骨肉瘤(即,既不是原始神经外胚层肿瘤也不是骨肉瘤)的患者(PFS 的 HR,0.39;95%CI,0.18-0.81;P=0.01)似乎从节拍化疗中获益。
结论和相关性:节拍化疗与安慰剂相比,并不能提高儿童颅外进展性实体恶性肿瘤患者的 6 个月 PFS。然而,无骨肉瘤且能耐受 3 个周期(9 周)以上治疗的患者可能受益。
试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT01858571。