Patten Matthew L, Mannion Damien J, Clifford Colin W G
School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia.
School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia
J Neurosci. 2017 May 3;37(18):4744-4750. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3511-16.2017. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
Vision can be considered as a process of probabilistic inference. In a Bayesian framework, perceptual estimates from sensory information are combined with prior knowledge, with a stronger influence of the prior when the sensory evidence is less certain. Here, we explored the behavioral and neural consequences of manipulating stimulus certainty in the context of orientation processing. First, we asked participants to judge whether a stimulus was oriented closer to vertical or the clockwise primary oblique (45°) for two stimulus types (spatially filtered noise textures and sinusoidal gratings) and three manipulations of certainty (orientation bandwidth, contrast, and duration). We found that participants consistently had a bias toward reporting orientation as closer to 45° during conditions of high certainty and that this bias was reduced when sensory evidence was less certain. Second, we measured event-related fMRI BOLD responses in human primary visual cortex (V1) and manipulated certainty via stimulus contrast (100% vs 3%). We then trained a multivariate classifier on the pattern of responses in V1 to cardinal and primary oblique orientations. We found that the classifier showed a bias toward classifying orientation as oblique at high contrast but categorized a wider range of orientations as cardinal for low-contrast stimuli. Orientation classification based on data from V1 thus paralleled the perceptual biases revealed through the behavioral experiments. This pattern of bias cannot be explained simply by a prior for cardinal orientations. Our perception of the world around us is biased through prior expectations rather than necessarily reflecting the true state of our environment. Here, we investigate biases in the visual processing of spatial orientation to understand how prior expectations and current sensory information interact to generate a percept. By degrading visual input in various ways, we are able to quantify the extent to which prior experience affects both perceptual judgments and neural responses in the human visual system. We observe systematic biases in the perception of orientation that correlate with the pattern of activity in the primary visual cortex of the human brain. These results indicate that prior expectations influence neural processing right from the earliest stage of the cortical hierarchy.
视觉可被视为一个概率推理过程。在贝叶斯框架中,来自感官信息的感知估计与先验知识相结合,当感官证据不太确定时,先验知识的影响更强。在此,我们探讨了在方向处理背景下操纵刺激确定性的行为和神经后果。首先,我们要求参与者针对两种刺激类型(空间滤波噪声纹理和正弦光栅)以及三种确定性操纵(方向带宽、对比度和持续时间),判断刺激的方向更接近垂直方向还是顺时针主斜向(45°)。我们发现,在高确定性条件下,参与者始终倾向于报告方向更接近45°,而当感官证据不太确定时,这种偏差会减小。其次,我们测量了人类初级视觉皮层(V1)中与事件相关的功能磁共振成像血氧水平依赖(BOLD)反应,并通过刺激对比度(100%对3%)来操纵确定性。然后,我们根据V1中对基本方向和主斜向的反应模式训练了一个多变量分类器。我们发现,该分类器在高对比度下倾向于将方向分类为斜向,但对于低对比度刺激,它将更广泛的方向分类为基本方向。基于V1数据的方向分类因此与行为实验中揭示的感知偏差相似。这种偏差模式不能简单地用基本方向的先验来解释。我们对周围世界的感知因先验期望而产生偏差,而不一定反映我们环境的真实状态。在此,我们研究空间方向视觉处理中的偏差,以了解先验期望和当前感官信息如何相互作用以产生感知。通过以各种方式降低视觉输入质量,我们能够量化先验经验对人类视觉系统中感知判断和神经反应的影响程度。我们观察到方向感知中的系统偏差与人类大脑初级视觉皮层中的活动模式相关。这些结果表明,先验期望从皮质层级的最早阶段就影响神经处理。