Suppr超能文献

急性髓系白血病的可测量残留病检测。

Measurable residual disease testing in acute myeloid leukaemia.

机构信息

Myeloid Malignancies Section, Hematology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Haematology Research Centre, Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Leukemia. 2017 Jul;31(7):1482-1490. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.113. Epub 2017 Apr 7.

Abstract

There is considerable interest in developing techniques to detect and/or quantify remaining leukaemia cells termed measurable or, less precisely, minimal residual disease (MRD) in persons with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in complete remission defined by cytomorphological criteria. An important reason for AML MRD-testing is the possibility of estimating the likelihood (and timing) of leukaemia relapse. A perfect MRD-test would precisely quantify leukaemia cells biologically able and likely to cause leukaemia relapse within a defined interval. AML is genetically diverse and there is currently no uniform approach to detecting such cells. Several technologies focused on immune phenotype or cytogenetic and/or molecular abnormalities have been developed, each with advantages and disadvantages. Many studies report a positive MRD-test at diverse time points during AML therapy identifies persons with a higher risk of leukaemia relapse compared with those with a negative MRD-test even after adjusting for other prognostic and predictive variables. No MRD-test in AML has perfect sensitivity and specificity for relapse prediction at the cohort- or subject levels and there are substantial rates of false-positive and -negative tests. Despite these limitations, correlations between MRD-test results and relapse risk have generated interest in MRD-test result-directed therapy interventions. However, convincing proof that a specific intervention will reduce relapse risk in persons with a positive MRD-test is lacking and needs testing in randomized trials. Routine clinical use of MRD-testing requires further refinements and standardization/harmonization of assay platforms and results reporting. Such data are needed to determine whether results of MRD-testing can be used as a surrogate end point in AML therapy trials. This could make drug-testing more efficient and accelerate regulatory approvals. Although MRD-testing in AML has advanced substantially, much remains to be done.

摘要

人们对于开发技术以检测和/或定量急性髓系白血病(AML)患者在细胞形态学标准定义的完全缓解中称为可测量的或不太准确的微小残留疾病(MRD)具有浓厚的兴趣。AML-MRD 检测的一个重要原因是有可能估计白血病复发的可能性(和时间)。完美的 MRD 检测将准确地定量生物学上能够并可能在规定的间隔内引起白血病复发的白血病细胞。AML 具有遗传多样性,目前没有统一的方法来检测这些细胞。已经开发了几种专注于免疫表型或细胞遗传学和/或分子异常的技术,每种技术都有其优点和缺点。许多研究报告称,在 AML 治疗过程中的不同时间点进行的阳性 MRD 检测可识别出与阴性 MRD 检测相比,白血病复发风险更高的患者,即使在调整了其他预后和预测变量之后也是如此。在 AML 中,没有一种 MRD 检测在队列或个体水平上对复发预测具有完美的敏感性和特异性,并且存在大量的假阳性和假阴性检测。尽管存在这些局限性,但 MRD 检测结果与复发风险之间的相关性激发了对 MRD 检测结果指导的治疗干预措施的兴趣。但是,缺乏特定干预措施将降低阳性 MRD 检测患者的复发风险的令人信服的证据,需要在随机试验中进行测试。MRD 检测的常规临床应用需要进一步改进和标准化/协调检测平台和结果报告。需要这些数据来确定 MRD 检测结果是否可以用作 AML 治疗试验的替代终点。这可以使药物测试更有效率并加快监管批准。尽管 AML 中的 MRD 检测已经取得了很大进展,但仍有许多工作要做。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验