Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jun;28(5):587-591. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12623. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
Apical microleakage between the root canal and periapical tissues is considered a common cause of endodontic failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the apical microleakage of various obturation techniques after immediate post space preparations with different drills.
One hundred twenty human single-rooted teeth were selected for this study. The coronal portions were removed to achieve a uniform length of 15 mm. All root canals were instrumented with ProTaper Next rotary files using crown-down technique. The 120 roots were randomly assigned to 3 experimental groups according to obturation technique (n = 40). The root canals were obturated with lateral condensation in group 1, single-cone technique in group 2, and Calamus 3D obturation system in group 3. Each group was divided into two subgroups (n = 20) according to drill types (Gates Glidden and Peeso drills) leaving 5 mm of apical gutta-percha. The apical microleakage was measured using the computerized fluid filtration meter method. The results were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni Corrected Mann-Whitney U multiple comparison post hoc tests.
There was no statistically significant difference between obturation techniques after post space preparation with Peeso drills (p > 0.05). In Gates Glidden drill groups, single-cone technique demonstrated higher leakage (0.0051 ± 0.0037 μl x min × cmH O ) than Calamus techniques (0.0019 ± 0.0012 μl x min × cmH O ) (p < 0.017).
Gates Glidden drills caused the highest apical leakage in teeth obturated with single-cone technique.
根管与根尖周组织之间的根尖微渗漏被认为是根管治疗失败的常见原因。本研究旨在评估不同钻具预备即刻桩道后,各种根管充填技术的根尖微渗漏。
本研究选取 120 颗人单根牙。去除冠部,使长度均达到 15mm。所有根管均采用冠向下技术用 ProTaper Next 机用镍钛锉预备。120 个根随机分为 3 个实验组,根据根管充填技术(n=40)分为 3 组。第 1 组采用侧方加压充填技术,第 2 组采用单根器械充填技术,第 3 组采用 Calamus 3D 根管充填系统。每组再根据钻具类型(Gates Glidden 钻和 Peeso 钻)分为 2 个亚组(n=20),根尖保留 5mm 牙胶尖。采用计算机化流体过滤测量仪法测量根尖微渗漏。采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验,Bonferroni 校正的 Mann-Whitney U 多重比较后检验进行结果评估。
Peeso 钻预备后根管充填技术之间无统计学差异(p>0.05)。Gates Glidden 钻组中,单根器械充填技术的渗漏量(0.0051±0.0037μl·min×cmH2O)显著高于 Calamus 技术(0.0019±0.0012μl·min×cmH2O)(p<0.017)。
Gates Glidden 钻预备时,单根器械充填技术会导致根尖微渗漏最高。