Mauler Flavien, Langguth Christoph, Schweizer Andreas, Vlachopoulos Lazaros, Gass Tobias, Lüthi Marcel, Fürnstahl Philipp
Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
J Orthop Res. 2017 Dec;35(12):2630-2636. doi: 10.1002/jor.23576. Epub 2017 May 4.
Corrective osteotomies of the forearm based on 3D computer simulation using contralateral anatomy as a reconstruction template is an approved method. Limitations are existing considerable differences between left and right forearms, and that a healthy contralateral anatomy is required. We evaluated if a computer model, not relying on the contralateral anatomy, may replace the current method by predicting the pre-traumatic healthy shape. A statistical shape model (SSM) was generated from a set of 59 CT scans of healthy forearms, encoding the normal anatomical variations. Three different configurations were simulated to predict the pre-traumatic shape with the SSM (cross-validation). In the first two, only the distal or proximal 50% of the radius were considered as pathological. In a third configuration, the entire radius was assumed to be pathological, only the ulna being intact. Corresponding experiments were performed with the ulna. Accuracy of the prediction was assessed by comparing the predicted bone with the healthy model. For the radius, mean rotation accuracy of the prediction between 2.9 ± 2.2° and 4.0 ± 3.1° in pronation/supination, 0.4 ± 0.3° and 0.6 ± 0.5° in flexion/extension, between 0.5 ± 0.3° and 0.5 ± 0.4° in radial-/ulnarduction. Mean translation accuracy along the same axes between 0.8 ± 0.7 and 1.0 ± 0.8 mm, 0.5 ± 0.4 and 0.6 ± 0.4 mm, 0.6 ± 0.4 and 0.6 ± 0.5 mm, respectively. For the ulna, mean rotation accuracy between 2.4 ± 1.9° and 4.7 ± 3.8° in pronation/supination, 0.3 ± 0.3° and 0.8 ± 0.6° in flexion/extension, 0.3 ± 0.2° and 0.7 ± 0.6° in radial-/ulnarduction. Mean translation accuracy between 0.6 ± 0.4 mm and 1.3 ± 0.9 mm, 0.4 ± 0.4 mm and 0.7 ± 0.5 mm, 0.5 ± 0.4 mm and 0.8 ± 0.6 mm, respectively. This technique provided high accuracy, and may replace the current method, if validated in clinical studies. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:2630-2636, 2017.
基于3D计算机模拟、以对侧解剖结构作为重建模板的前臂矫正截骨术是一种已获认可的方法。其局限性在于左右前臂之间存在相当大的差异,且需要健康的对侧解剖结构。我们评估了一种不依赖对侧解剖结构的计算机模型是否可以通过预测创伤前的健康形态来取代当前方法。从一组59例健康前臂的CT扫描中生成了一个统计形状模型(SSM),对正常解剖变异进行编码。模拟了三种不同的构型,用SSM预测创伤前的形状(交叉验证)。在前两种构型中,仅将桡骨远端或近端50%视为病理性的。在第三种构型中,假定整个桡骨均为病理性的,仅尺骨完整。对尺骨进行了相应的实验。通过将预测的骨骼与健康模型进行比较来评估预测的准确性。对于桡骨,预测的平均旋转准确性在旋前/旋后时为2.9±2.2°至4.0±3.1°,屈伸时为0.4±0.3°至0.6±0.5°,桡偏/尺偏时为0.5±0.3°至0.5±0.4°。沿相同轴的平均平移准确性分别为0.8±0.7至1.0±0.8mm、0.5±0.4至0.6±0.4mm、0.6±0.4至0.6±0.5mm。对于尺骨,旋前/旋后时的平均旋转准确性为2.4±1.9°至4.7±3.8°,屈伸时为0.3±0.3°至0.8±0.6°,桡偏/尺偏时为0.3±0.2°至0.7±0.6°。平均平移准确性分别为0.6±0.4mm至1.3±0.9mm、0.4±0.4mm至0.7±0.5mm、0.5±0.4mm至0.8±0.6mm。该技术具有很高的准确性,如果在临床研究中得到验证,则可能取代当前方法。©2017骨科研究协会。由Wiley Periodicals, Inc.出版。《矫形外科学研究》35:2630 - 2636, 2017。