Suppr超能文献

主动脉夹层颈动脉延伸的管理与结局

Management and outcomes of carotid artery extension of aortic dissections.

作者信息

Laser Adriana, Drucker Charles B, Harris Donald G, Flohr Tanya, Toursavadkohi Shahab, Sarkar Rajabrata, Taylor Bradley, Crawford Robert S

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md.

Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md; Center for Aortic Disease, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Md.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2017 Aug;66(2):445-453. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.12.137. Epub 2017 Apr 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aortic dissection (AD) is the most common aortic catastrophe. Carotid artery dissection due to extension of AD (CAEAD) is one severe complication of this condition. Despite years of refinement in the techniques for repair of AD, the optimal management strategy for CAEAD remains yet to be described. We hypothesized that CAEAD eventually resolves on antiplatelet therapy with a low but not insignificant risk of cerebrovascular accident (CVA).

METHODS

This was a single-institution retrospective review of patients admitted with nontraumatic coincident aortic and carotid dissection between 2001 and 2013.

RESULTS

CAEAD was present in 38 patients (24 men [53%]). The median age was 59.5 years (range, 25-85 years). A Stanford type A AD was diagnosed in 36 patients (95%). CVA or transient ischemic attack was identified in 11 patients (29%). Eight were potentially attributable to the carotid lesion. Two of these eight strokes resulted in death. Of the 11 CVAs and transient ischemic attacks, 8 were evident at presentation, 2 were diagnosed postoperatively during hospitalization, and 1 was diagnosed during early follow-up. Only one of these three postadmission strokes was attributable to the carotid lesion. Nonoperative management of aortic and carotid dissections was pursued in 9 patients (24%), 26 (68%) underwent open repair, and 4 (11%) had endovascular management of AD (2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair, 2 endovascular fenestrations), including 1 patient with a staged hybrid procedure (frozen elephant trunk). There were eight inpatient deaths (21%) and nine deaths in the follow-up period. Of the 30 patients who survived to discharge, 24 (80%) were managed with antiplatelet therapy. At a median follow-up of 14.5 months in 22 patients with follow-up computed tomography scans available, a minority of lesions had resolved, and only one CVA was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that CAEAD was associated almost exclusively with type A AD, was typically unilateral, most often on the left, and usually persisted at follow-up. Many CAEAD patients presented with CVA and experienced significant early mortality. Notably, not all CVA events were attributable to the CAEAD. CVAs were not common after admission, and there appeared to be a low risk of new or subsequent stroke during follow-up with routine antiplatelet and antihypertensive therapy.

摘要

背景

主动脉夹层(AD)是最常见的主动脉急症。AD扩展导致的颈动脉夹层(CAEAD)是这种疾病的一种严重并发症。尽管AD修复技术多年来不断完善,但CAEAD的最佳管理策略仍有待描述。我们推测,CAEAD最终可通过抗血小板治疗得到缓解,但存在发生脑血管意外(CVA)的低但并非微不足道的风险。

方法

这是一项单机构回顾性研究,纳入了2001年至2013年间因非创伤性同时发生的主动脉和颈动脉夹层入院的患者。

结果

38例患者(24例男性[53%])存在CAEAD。中位年龄为59.5岁(范围25 - 85岁)。36例患者(95%)诊断为斯坦福A型AD。11例患者(29%)发生CVA或短暂性脑缺血发作。其中8例可能归因于颈动脉病变。这8例中风中有2例导致死亡。在11例CVA和短暂性脑缺血发作中,8例在就诊时即明显,2例在住院期间术后诊断,1例在早期随访时诊断。这3例入院后中风中只有1例归因于颈动脉病变。9例患者(24%)对主动脉和颈动脉夹层采取非手术治疗,26例(68%)接受开放修复,4例(11%)对AD进行血管内治疗(2例胸主动脉腔内修复,2例血管内开窗),包括1例分期杂交手术(冰冻象鼻术)患者。住院期间有8例死亡(21%),随访期间有9例死亡。在30例存活至出院的患者中,24例(80%)接受抗血小板治疗。在22例有随访计算机断层扫描的患者中,中位随访14.5个月,少数病变已缓解,仅报告1例CVA。

结论

本研究发现,CAEAD几乎仅与A型AD相关,通常为单侧,最常见于左侧,且在随访时通常持续存在。许多CAEAD患者出现CVA并经历了显著的早期死亡率。值得注意的是,并非所有CVA事件都归因于CAEAD。入院后CVA并不常见,在常规抗血小板和抗高血压治疗的随访期间,新发或后续中风的风险似乎较低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验