Drummond Neil M, Cressman Erin K, Carlsen Anthony N
School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, 125 University Private, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1N 6N5.
School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, 125 University Private, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1N 6N5.
Neuropsychologia. 2017 May;99:360-367. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
In a typical go/no-go task a single imperative stimulus is presented each trial, either a go or no-go stimulus. Participants are instructed to initiate a known response upon appearance of the go-signal and withhold the response if the no-go signal is presented. It is unclear whether the go-response is prepared in advance of the imperative stimulus in a go/no-go task. Moreover, it is unclear if inhibitory control processes suppress preparatory go-activation. The purpose of the present experiment was 1) to determine whether the go-response is prepared in advance of stimulus identification with the use of a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS), and 2) investigate the inhibitory role of the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) and pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA) during the performance of a go/no-go task with the use of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS). The experiment consisted of three phases; a pre-cTBS phase in which participants completed a go/no-go and simple-RT task, followed by offline cTBS to temporarily deactivate either rIFG or preSMA (with a sham control), then a post-cTBS phase which was identical to the pre-cTBS phase. Results revealed that stimulation to both cortical sites impaired participants' ability to withhold movements during no-go trials. Notably, rIFG or preSMA stimulation did not affect the latency of voluntary go-responses and did not enable the SAS to involuntarily trigger responses. These findings suggest that preparation and initiation of the go-response occurs after the imperative stimulus, with the rIFG and preSMA involved in inhibiting the go-response once the stimulus is identified as a no-go signal.
在典型的“是/否”任务中,每次试验呈现一个单一的指令性刺激,要么是“是”刺激,要么是“否”刺激。参与者被指示在“是”信号出现时发起已知的反应,如果出现“否”信号则抑制反应。目前尚不清楚在“是/否”任务中,“是”反应是否在指令性刺激之前就已准备好。此外,尚不清楚抑制控制过程是否会抑制准备性的“是”激活。本实验的目的是:1)使用惊人听觉刺激(SAS)来确定“是”反应是否在刺激识别之前就已准备好;2)使用连续theta爆发刺激(cTBS)研究右下额叶回(rIFG)和前辅助运动区(preSMA)在“是/否”任务执行过程中的抑制作用。该实验包括三个阶段:一个cTBS前阶段,参与者完成“是/否”和简单反应时任务,随后进行离线cTBS以暂时使rIFG或preSMA失活(设置假刺激对照),然后是cTBS后阶段,该阶段与cTBS前阶段相同。结果显示,对这两个皮质部位的刺激均损害了参与者在“否”试验中抑制运动的能力。值得注意的是,rIFG或preSMA刺激并不影响自发“是”反应的潜伏期,也不能使SAS非自愿地触发反应。这些发现表明,“是”反应的准备和启动发生在指令性刺激之后,rIFG和preSMA在刺激被识别为“否”信号时参与抑制“是”反应。