Li Cuiyun, Xu Jing, Zheng Yan, Chen Guiling, Wang Jianmeng, Ma Liying, Qiao Yan, Niu Junqi, Wu Min, Zhang Hong, Li Xiaojiiao, Chen Hong, Zhu Xiaoxue, Liu Chengjiao, Ding Yanhua
Phase I Clinical Unit, China-Frontage USA, The First Hospital of Jilin University.
Department of Neurology, The First Hospital of Jilin University.
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 2017 Jun 1;65(6):524-529. doi: 10.1248/cpb.c16-00866. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
The present study was designed to assess the bioequivalence of two agomelatine formulations (25-mg tablets) in healthy Chinese male subjects. This single-dose, open-label, randomized, four-way replicate study with a 1-week washout period was conducted in 60 healthy Chinese male volunteers under fasting conditions. Blood samples were collected over a 12-h period after a single dose of the 25-mg agomelatine test (T) formulation or a reference (R) formulation, and the drug concentrations were assayed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental model. Bioequivalence between the formulations was assessed. Tolerability and safety were monitored by physical examination, electrocardiogram (12-lead ECG), clinical laboratory tests, and adverse events (AEs). A total of 56 out of 60 subjects completed the study. No AEs were observed. The values of maximum plasma concentration (C), maximum concentration (T), area under curve (AUC) and t were 12.032 ng/mL, 0.658 h, 12.637 ng·h/mL, and 0.813 h, respectively, for the test formulation, and 10.891 ng/mL, 0.709 h, 11.572 ng·h/mL, and 0.96 h, respectively, for the reference formulation. The intra-individual variability of C and AUC were 78.3 and 61.8%, respectively. The inter-individual coefficients of variance (CVs) of C and AUC were approximately 100%. The 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of means for the log-transformed C (97.7-124.9%), AUC (98.2-118%), and AUC (97.8-117.2%) were within the guideline range of bioequivalence (80-125%). The test and reference formulations of agomelatine met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence of the Chinese Food and Drug Administration. Significant intra-individual and inter-individual variations were found.
本研究旨在评估两种阿戈美拉汀制剂(25毫克片剂)在健康中国男性受试者中的生物等效性。这项单剂量、开放标签、随机、四交叉重复研究设有1周的洗脱期,在60名健康中国男性志愿者中于空腹条件下进行。在单次服用25毫克阿戈美拉汀试验(T)制剂或参比(R)制剂后的12小时内采集血样,采用液相色谱串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)测定药物浓度。使用非房室模型计算药代动力学参数。评估制剂之间的生物等效性。通过体格检查、心电图(12导联心电图)、临床实验室检查和不良事件(AE)监测耐受性和安全性。60名受试者中有56名完成了研究。未观察到不良事件。试验制剂的最大血浆浓度(Cmax)、达峰时间(Tmax)、曲线下面积(AUC)和消除半衰期(t1/2)值分别为12.032纳克/毫升、0.658小时、12.637纳克·小时/毫升和0.813小时,参比制剂的相应值分别为10.891纳克/毫升、0.709小时、11.572纳克·小时/毫升和0.96小时。Cmax和AUC的个体内变异分别为78.3%和61.8%。Cmax和AUC的个体间变异系数(CV)约为100%。对数转换后的Cmax(97.7 - 124.9%)、AUC(0 - t)(98.2 - 118%)和AUC(0 - ∞)(97.8 - 117.2%)的均值比的90%置信区间在生物等效性指导范围(80 - 125%)内。阿戈美拉汀的试验制剂和参比制剂符合中国食品药品监督管理总局的生物等效性监管标准。发现存在显著的个体内和个体间差异。