文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of two formulations of 10-mg amlodipine besylate: an open-label, single-dose, randomized, two-way crossover study in healthy Chinese male volunteers.

作者信息

Liu Yun, Jia Jingying, Liu Gangyi, Li Shuijun, Lu Chuan, Liu Yanmei, Yu Chen

机构信息

Central Laboratory, Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2009 Apr;31(4):777-83. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.04.013.


DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.04.013
PMID:19446150
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Amlodipine is a third-generation dihydropyridine calcium antagonist for the treatment of angina and hypertension. The relative bioavailability of a newly developed dispersible tablet as compared with an established branded formulation has not been reported in a Chinese population. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the pharmacokinetic properties, bioavailability, and bioequivalence of a newly developed dispersible tablet formulation of amlodipine besylate with those of an established branded formulation in healthy Chinese adult male volunteers. METHODS: An open-label, single-dose, randomized, 2-way crossover study was conducted in fasted healthy Chinese male volunteers. Eligible participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 2 tablets (5 mg each) of the test or reference formulation, followed by a 2-week washout period and administration of the alternate formulation. The study drugs were administered after a 10-hour overnight fast. Serum samples were collected over 120 hours. Amlodipine concentrations in the serum were analyzed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry with positive ion electrospray ionization using the multiple reaction monitoring mode. The visible detection of the method was in the range of 0.2 to 32.0 ng/mL, and the lower limit of quantification for amlodipine was 0.2 ng/mL. The amlodipine serum concentration-time curves were used to obtain pharmacokinetic parameters including AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity)), and C(max). The criteria for bioequivalence were 90% CIs of 80% to 125% for AUC and 70% to 143% for C(max), according to guidelines of the State Food and Drug Administration of the People's Republic of China. Tolerability was based on the recording of adverse events (AEs), monitoring vital signs, electrocardiograms, and clinical laboratory tests at baseline and completion of the study. RESULTS: A total of 20 healthy Chinese male volunteers (mean [SD] age, 21.4 [2.6] years [range, 1926 years]; weight, 61.3 [5.4] kg [range, 54.0-75.0 kg]; and height, 171.2 [3.6] cm [range, 162.0-177.0 cm) were included in the study. The mean (SD) C(max), T(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity)) values after administration of the test and reference formulations, respectively, were as follows: 5.46 (1.13) versus 5.88 (1.24) ng/mL, 7.70 (2.08) versus 9.20 (4.18) hours, 284.56 (77.59) versus 311.34 (75.97) ng/mL/h, and 331.37 (111.03) versus 358.74 (101.10) ng/mL/h. The mean (SD) t(1/2) was 38.52 (10.51) hours for the test formulation and 38.75 (7.07) hours for the reference formulation. On analysis of variance, no period or sequence effects were observed for any pharmacokinetic property; however, a significant formulation effect was observed for C(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity)). The relative bioavailability of the test formulation was 90.9% by mean AUC(0-t) and 91.2% by mean AUC(0-infinity). The 90% CIs for the ratios of C(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity) were 88.4% to 97.5%, 86.4% to 95.7%, and 85.8% to 97.0%, respectively, meeting the predetermined criteria for bioequivalence. One subject (5%) reported 2 AEs. The AEs were mild, possibly associated with study drug, and resolved spontaneously by the next evaluation. No serious AEs were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In this small study in healthy Chinese adult male volunteers, a single 10-mg dose of the dispersible tablet formulation (test) of amlodipine besylate met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence to the established tablet formulation (reference) based on the rate and extent of absorption. Both formulations were well tolerated.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of two formulations of 10-mg amlodipine besylate: an open-label, single-dose, randomized, two-way crossover study in healthy Chinese male volunteers.

Clin Ther. 2009-4

[2]
Pharmacokinetic properties and bioequivalence of two compound formulations of 1500 mg ampicillin (1167 mg)/probenecid (333 mg): a randomized-sequence, single-dose, open-label, two-period crossover study in healthy Chinese male volunteers.

Clin Ther. 2010-3

[3]
Pharmacokinetic properties and bioequivalence of two formulations of arbidol: an open-label, single-dose, randomized-sequence, two-period crossover study in healthy Chinese male volunteers.

Clin Ther. 2009-4

[4]
Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of two losartan potassium 50-mg tablets: A single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, two-way crossover study in healthy Chinese male volunteers.

Clin Ther. 2010-7

[5]
Comparative bioavailability and tolerability of a single 20-mg dose of two fluoxetine hydrochloride dispersible tablet formulations in fasting, healthy Chinese male volunteers: an open-label, randomized-sequence, two-period crossover study.

Clin Ther. 2010-10

[6]
Bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic comparison of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in healthy Chinese male volunteers: an open-label, randomized-sequence, single-dose, two-way crossover study.

Clin Ther. 2010-1

[7]
Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of two different atorvastatin calcium 10-mg tablets: A single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, two-period crossover study in healthy fasted Chinese adult males.

Clin Ther. 2010-7

[8]
Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability comparison of generic and branded citalopram 20 mg tablets: an open-label, randomized-sequence, two-period crossover study in healthy Chinese CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers.

Clin Drug Investig. 2013-1

[9]
Pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence comparison between orally disintegrating and conventional tablet formulations of flurbiprofen: a single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, two-period crossover study in healthy Chinese male volunteers.

Clin Ther. 2009-8

[10]
Bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic evaluation of two formulations of risperidone 2 mg : an open-label, single-dose, fasting, randomized-sequence, two-way crossover study in healthy male Chinese volunteers.

Drugs R D. 2013-3

引用本文的文献

[1]
Blood Pressure Variability (BPV): What Clinicians Need to Know a 2025 Expert Consensus Report Endorsed by the Egyptian Society of Cardiology.

High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2025-9-10

[2]
Can Generic Medications Be a Safe and Effective Alternative to Brand-Name Drugs for Cardiovascular Disease Treatment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025-3-7

[3]
Evaluation for Potential Drug-Drug Interaction of MT921 Using In Vitro Studies and Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Models.

Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021-7-7

[4]
Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of fixed-dose combination of candesartan cilexetil/amlodipine besylate (16/10 mg) versus coadministration of individual formulations in healthy subjects.

Transl Clin Pharmacol. 2020-6

[5]
Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Tylerdipine Hydrochloride, a Novel Dihydropyridine Dual L/T-type Calcium Channel Blocker, after Single and Multiple Oral Doses in Healthy Chinese Subjects.

Clin Drug Investig. 2019-1

[6]
Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetics of Bisoprolol-Amlodipine 5 mg/5 mg Combination Tablet versus Bisoprolol 5 mg Tablet and Amlodipine 5 mg Tablet: An Open-Label, Randomized, Two-Sequence Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Subjects.

Clin Drug Investig. 2018-12

[7]
No pharmacokinetic interactions between candesartan and amlodipine following multiple oral administrations in healthy subjects.

Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018-8-10

[8]
Comparative pharmacokinetics of a fixed-dose combination vs concomitant administration of telmisartan and S-amlodipine in healthy adult volunteers.

Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017-12-11

[9]
Formulations of Amlodipine: A Review.

J Pharm (Cairo). 2016

[10]
Generic versus brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular diseases.

Eur J Epidemiol. 2016-4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索