Yun Chul Hyun, Yun Jeong Hwan, Baek Jin Ok, Roh Joo Young, Lee Jong Rok
Department of Dermatology, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Human Skin Clinic, Uijeongbu, Korea.
Ann Dermatol. 2017 Apr;29(2):137-142. doi: 10.5021/ad.2017.29.2.137. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
Demodicosis is a parasitic skin disease caused by mites, and the determination of mite density per square centimeter is important to diagnose demodicosis. Standardized skin surface biopsy (SSSB) and direct microscopic examination (DME) are commonly used to determine mites density (Dd). However, no study has previously compared these two methods with respect to clinical types and distribution patterns of demodicosis.
The aim of this study was to compare the value of SSSB and DME findings in reference to the clinical types and distribution patterns of demodicosis.
The medical records of 35 patients diagnosed with demodicosis between December 2011 and June 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Demodicosis was classified according to four clinical types (pityriasis folliculorum, rosacea type, acne type, and perioral type) and three distribution patterns (diffuse pattern, U-zone pattern, and T-zone pattern). Two samples, one for SSSB and one for DME, were obtained from a lesion of each patient.
In all patients, mean Dd and the proportion with a high Dd (>5D/cm) by DME (14.5±3.3, 80.0%, respectively) were higher than by SSSB (5.5±1.3, 37.1%, respectively; <0.01, =0.02, respectively). In terms of clinical types, for rosacea type, mean Dd and proportion with a high Dd by DME (12.4±3.5, 84.6%, respectively) were significantly greater than those determined by SSSB (3.6±1.2, 23.1%; =0.04, =0.04, respectively). In terms of distribution pattern, for the diffuse pattern, mean Dd and the proportion with a high Dd by DME (17.5±3.7, 100%, respectively) were significantly higher than those determined by SSSB (6.0±2.7, 26.7%; <0.01, <0.01, respectively).
The results of our study revealed that DME is a more sensitive method for detecting than SSSB, especially in patients with diffuse pattern and suspected rosacea type. Further research is needed to confirm this finding.
蠕形螨病是一种由螨虫引起的寄生虫性皮肤病,每平方厘米螨虫密度的测定对蠕形螨病的诊断很重要。标准化皮肤表面活检(SSSB)和直接显微镜检查(DME)常用于测定螨虫密度(Dd)。然而,此前尚无研究就蠕形螨病的临床类型和分布模式对这两种方法进行比较。
本研究旨在比较标准化皮肤表面活检和直接显微镜检查结果在蠕形螨病临床类型和分布模式方面的价值。
回顾性分析2011年12月至2015年6月期间35例诊断为蠕形螨病患者的病历。蠕形螨病根据四种临床类型(毛囊糠疹型、酒渣鼻型、痤疮型和口周型)和三种分布模式(弥漫型、U区型和T区型)进行分类。从每位患者的一处皮损处获取两个样本,一个用于标准化皮肤表面活检,一个用于直接显微镜检查。
在所有患者中,直接显微镜检查的平均Dd和高Dd(>5D/cm)比例(分别为14.5±3.3和80.0%)高于标准化皮肤表面活检(分别为5.5±1.3和37.1%;P均<0.01)。在临床类型方面,对于酒渣鼻型,直接显微镜检查的平均Dd和高Dd比例(分别为12.4±3.5和84.6%)显著高于标准化皮肤表面活检所测定的结果(分别为3.6±1.2和23.1%;P均=0.04)。在分布模式方面,对于弥漫型,直接显微镜检查的平均Dd和高Dd比例(分别为17.5±3.7和`100%)显著高于标准化皮肤表面活检所测定的结果(分别为6.0±2.7和26.7%;P均<0.01)。
我们研究结果显示,直接显微镜检查在检测螨虫方面比标准化皮肤表面活检更敏感,尤其是在弥漫型和疑似酒渣鼻型患者中。需要进一步研究来证实这一发现。