Suppr超能文献

通过标准化皮肤表面活检和直接显微镜检查测定螨密度及其与临床类型和分布模式的关系。

Mite Density Determinations by Standardized Skin Surface Biopsy and Direct Microscopic Examination and Their Relations with Clinical Types and Distribution Patterns.

作者信息

Yun Chul Hyun, Yun Jeong Hwan, Baek Jin Ok, Roh Joo Young, Lee Jong Rok

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.

Human Skin Clinic, Uijeongbu, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Dermatol. 2017 Apr;29(2):137-142. doi: 10.5021/ad.2017.29.2.137. Epub 2017 Mar 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Demodicosis is a parasitic skin disease caused by mites, and the determination of mite density per square centimeter is important to diagnose demodicosis. Standardized skin surface biopsy (SSSB) and direct microscopic examination (DME) are commonly used to determine mites density (Dd). However, no study has previously compared these two methods with respect to clinical types and distribution patterns of demodicosis.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the value of SSSB and DME findings in reference to the clinical types and distribution patterns of demodicosis.

METHODS

The medical records of 35 patients diagnosed with demodicosis between December 2011 and June 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Demodicosis was classified according to four clinical types (pityriasis folliculorum, rosacea type, acne type, and perioral type) and three distribution patterns (diffuse pattern, U-zone pattern, and T-zone pattern). Two samples, one for SSSB and one for DME, were obtained from a lesion of each patient.

RESULTS

In all patients, mean Dd and the proportion with a high Dd (>5D/cm) by DME (14.5±3.3, 80.0%, respectively) were higher than by SSSB (5.5±1.3, 37.1%, respectively; <0.01, =0.02, respectively). In terms of clinical types, for rosacea type, mean Dd and proportion with a high Dd by DME (12.4±3.5, 84.6%, respectively) were significantly greater than those determined by SSSB (3.6±1.2, 23.1%; =0.04, =0.04, respectively). In terms of distribution pattern, for the diffuse pattern, mean Dd and the proportion with a high Dd by DME (17.5±3.7, 100%, respectively) were significantly higher than those determined by SSSB (6.0±2.7, 26.7%; <0.01, <0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study revealed that DME is a more sensitive method for detecting than SSSB, especially in patients with diffuse pattern and suspected rosacea type. Further research is needed to confirm this finding.

摘要

背景

蠕形螨病是一种由螨虫引起的寄生虫性皮肤病,每平方厘米螨虫密度的测定对蠕形螨病的诊断很重要。标准化皮肤表面活检(SSSB)和直接显微镜检查(DME)常用于测定螨虫密度(Dd)。然而,此前尚无研究就蠕形螨病的临床类型和分布模式对这两种方法进行比较。

目的

本研究旨在比较标准化皮肤表面活检和直接显微镜检查结果在蠕形螨病临床类型和分布模式方面的价值。

方法

回顾性分析2011年12月至2015年6月期间35例诊断为蠕形螨病患者的病历。蠕形螨病根据四种临床类型(毛囊糠疹型、酒渣鼻型、痤疮型和口周型)和三种分布模式(弥漫型、U区型和T区型)进行分类。从每位患者的一处皮损处获取两个样本,一个用于标准化皮肤表面活检,一个用于直接显微镜检查。

结果

在所有患者中,直接显微镜检查的平均Dd和高Dd(>5D/cm)比例(分别为14.5±3.3和80.0%)高于标准化皮肤表面活检(分别为5.5±1.3和37.1%;P均<0.01)。在临床类型方面,对于酒渣鼻型,直接显微镜检查的平均Dd和高Dd比例(分别为12.4±3.5和84.6%)显著高于标准化皮肤表面活检所测定的结果(分别为3.6±1.2和23.1%;P均=0.04)。在分布模式方面,对于弥漫型,直接显微镜检查的平均Dd和高Dd比例(分别为17.5±3.7和`100%)显著高于标准化皮肤表面活检所测定的结果(分别为6.0±2.7和26.7%;P均<0.01)。

结论

我们研究结果显示,直接显微镜检查在检测螨虫方面比标准化皮肤表面活检更敏感,尤其是在弥漫型和疑似酒渣鼻型患者中。需要进一步研究来证实这一发现。

相似文献

4
Reflectance confocal microscopy vs. standardized skin surface biopsy for measuring the density of Demodex mites.
Skin Res Technol. 2014 Nov;20(4):435-9. doi: 10.1111/srt.12137. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
5
A new superficial needle-scraping method for assessing Demodex density in papulopustular rosacea.
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Apr;19(4):896-900. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13082. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
6
The Association Between Acne Vulgaris, Acne Vulgaris with Nonspecific Facial Dermatitis, and Mite Presence.
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024 Jan 22;17:137-146. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S450540. eCollection 2024.
7
Demodicosis: a clinicopathological study.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009 Mar;60(3):453-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.10.058.
8
Erythematotelangiectatic rosacea may be associated with a subclinical stage of demodicosis: a case-control study.
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Oct;181(4):818-825. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17817. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
9
Increased frequency of Demodex blepharitis in rosacea and facial demodicosis patients.
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 May;19(5):1260-1265. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13150. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
10
The rapid effect of pulsed dye laser on demodex density of facial skin.
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2019;21(3):123-126. doi: 10.1080/14764172.2018.1481509. Epub 2018 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Raising awareness of Demodex mites: a neglected cause of skin disease.
Infection. 2025 May 3. doi: 10.1007/s15010-025-02521-z.
2
Significance of and in Pathogenesis of Dermatological Diseases-Current State of Knowledge.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 3;61(4):660. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040660.
3
Decoding Acne Vulgaris: Insights into Pathogenesis, Treatment Modalities, Diagnosis and Recent Advancements.
Recent Adv Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov. 2025;19(1):18-30. doi: 10.2174/0127722708312980240718093537.
4
mites among solid organ transplant recipients: a cross-sectional study.
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2025 Feb;42(1):89-95. doi: 10.5114/ada.2024.145198. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
5
The Prevalence of spp. Infestation in Dermatological Patients in Northern Poland.
Life (Basel). 2024 Sep 21;14(9):1196. doi: 10.3390/life14091196.
7
Case Series of Demodicosis in Acne Vulgaris Patients.
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023 Nov 18;16:3363-3368. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S441581. eCollection 2023.
8
The Possible Relation of and Facial Erythema in Connective Tissue Diseases.
Iran J Parasitol. 2023 Apr-Jun;18(2):237-243. doi: 10.18502/ijpa.v18i2.13190.
9
Effect of Phototherapy on Demodex Parasıte Densıty.
Indian J Dermatol. 2022 Nov-Dec;67(6):715-718. doi: 10.4103/ijd.ijd_1116_20.
10
Demodicosis as an opportunistic infection in a patient with Crohn's disease treated with infliximab.
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2023 Feb;40(1):171-172. doi: 10.5114/ada.2022.119411. Epub 2022 Sep 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Human demodicosis: revisit and a proposed classification.
Br J Dermatol. 2014 Jun;170(6):1219-25. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12850.
2
Sebum, acne, skin elasticity, and gender difference - which is the major influencing factor for facial pores?
Skin Res Technol. 2013 Feb;19(1):e45-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2011.00605.x. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
3
Facial dermatosis associated with Demodex: a case-control study.
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2011 Dec;12(12):1008-15. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1100179.
4
Papulopustular rosacea, skin immunity and Demodex: pityriasis folliculorum as a missing link.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012 Jan;26(1):19-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04310.x. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
6
Demodicosis: a clinicopathological study.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009 Mar;60(3):453-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.10.058.
7
Standardized skin surface biopsy: method to estimate the Demodex folliculorum density, not to study the Demodex folliculorum prevalence.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007 Oct;21(9):1301-2; author reply 1302. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2007.02455.x.
8
Density of Demodex folliculorum in perioral dermatitis.
Acta Derm Venereol. 2005;85(3):211-5. doi: 10.1080/00015550510030069.
9
A clinico-pathological approach to the classification of human demodicosis.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2005 Aug;3(8):607-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2005.05725.x.
10
Demodicosis and rosacea: epidemiology and significance in daily dermatologic practice.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005 Jan;52(1):74-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2004.05.034.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验