Moradi Maryam, Nouri Shadi, Nourozi Ali, Golbidi Danial
Department of Radiology, Medical School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Department of Radiology, Sina Hospital, Isfahan, Iran.
Pol J Radiol. 2017 Mar 25;82:165-169. doi: 10.12659/PJR.900643. eCollection 2017.
There are controversies regarding the usefulness of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) for predicting coronary artery stenosis. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of CACS for determining the presence and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with sign and symptoms of the disease.
MATERIAL/METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 748 consecutive patients with suspected CAD, referred for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), were enrolled. The mean CACS was compared between patients with different severities of coronary artery stenosis. The association between CACS and different CAD risk factors was determined as well. Different cutoff points of CACS for discriminating between different levels of coronary artery stenosis was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
The mean CACS was significantly different between different levels of coronary artery stenosis (P<0.001) and there was a significant positive association between the severity of CAD and CACS (P<0.001,r=0.781). ROC curve analysis indicated that the optimal cutoff point for discriminating between CAD (presence of stenosis) and the non-stenosis condition was 5.35 with 88.6% sensitivity and 86.2% specificity. Area under the curve for different levels of coronary artery stenosis did not have sufficient sensitivity and specificity for discriminating between different levels of CAD severity (<70%).
The study demonstrated that there is a significant association between CACS and the presence as well as the severity of CAD. CACS could have an appropriate prognostic value for the determination of coronary artery stenosis but not for discriminating between different severities of stenoses.
关于冠状动脉钙化积分(CACS)预测冠状动脉狭窄的有用性存在争议。本研究的目的是确定CACS在诊断有冠心病体征和症状患者的冠心病(CAD)存在情况及严重程度方面的预后价值。
材料/方法:在这项横断面研究中,纳入了748例因疑似CAD接受冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)的连续患者。比较了不同严重程度冠状动脉狭窄患者的平均CACS。还确定了CACS与不同CAD危险因素之间的关联。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定区分不同程度冠状动脉狭窄的CACS不同截断点。
不同程度冠状动脉狭窄之间的平均CACS有显著差异(P<0.001),CAD严重程度与CACS之间存在显著正相关(P<0.001,r=0.781)。ROC曲线分析表明,区分CAD(存在狭窄)和无狭窄情况的最佳截断点为5.35,敏感性为88.6%,特异性为86.2%。不同程度冠状动脉狭窄的曲线下面积对于区分不同程度的CAD严重程度(<70%)没有足够的敏感性和特异性。
该研究表明CACS与CAD的存在及严重程度之间存在显著关联。CACS在确定冠状动脉狭窄方面可能具有适当的预后价值,但在区分不同严重程度的狭窄方面则不然。