Adams Kirkwood F, Giblin Erika M, Pearce Natalie, Patterson J Herbert
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Radiology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Jun;37(6):645-656. doi: 10.1002/phar.1934. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
Heart failure is well recognized as a major public health concern not only due to severe and frequent adverse health outcomes but also related to the major financial burden this syndrome presents with advancing age in Western societies. Despite the dire need for more efficacious therapies and better application of existing advances, treatment gaps persist, and outcomes in heart failure remain poor, with continually high mortality and morbidity. Treatment guidelines provide one strategy for advancing quality of care in patients with heart failure. This approach, with well-known potential strengths and weaknesses, has both adherents and detractors. Heart failure treatment guidelines have been in sharp focus recently due to updates that address the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2015 of two new pharmacologic therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: sacubitril-valsartan and ivabradine. Our commentary will revisit issues in guideline methodology and discuss these in the context of the updates addressing the FDA approval of new pharmacologic agents for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
心力衰竭被公认为是一个重大的公共卫生问题,这不仅是因为其会导致严重且频繁出现的不良健康后果,还因为在西方社会,随着年龄增长,这种综合征会带来巨大的经济负担。尽管迫切需要更有效的治疗方法以及更好地应用现有进展,但治疗差距依然存在,心力衰竭的治疗效果仍然不佳,死亡率和发病率持续居高不下。治疗指南为提高心力衰竭患者的护理质量提供了一种策略。这种方法有其众所周知的潜在优势和劣势,既有支持者也有反对者。由于2015年美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准了两种用于射血分数降低的心力衰竭的新药物疗法:沙库巴曲缬沙坦和伊伐布雷定,心力衰竭治疗指南最近受到了密切关注。我们的评论将重新审视指南制定方法中的问题,并在涉及FDA批准用于射血分数降低的心力衰竭的新药物制剂的更新背景下进行讨论。