• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向体内应用地塞米松安全性证据的新一步:一项动物研究。

A New Step Toward Evidence of In Vivo Perineural Dexamethasone Safety: An Animal Study.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Feb;43(2):180-185. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000392.

DOI:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000392
PMID:28394848
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyze histological nerve toxicity of perineural dexamethasone administration in combination with ropivacaine on mice. Efficacy of perineural dexamethasone in combination with regional anesthesia is clearly demonstrated. However, the safety of this procedure is still a matter of debate.

METHODS

A sciatic nerve block was performed on 90 mice. Five groups, each containing 18 mice assigned randomly, were used in these experiments: the sham group (isotonic saline solution), R group (perineural ropivacaine), D group (perineural dexamethasone), RDPN group (perineural ropivacaine and perineural dexamethasone), and the RDS group (perineural ropivacaine and systemic dexamethasone). Sensory and motor blocks were evaluated every 30 minutes for 14 hours. Fourteen and 28 days after this procedure, 9 mice in each group were killed for sciatic nerve histological assessment.

RESULTS

No statistical difference was observed between different groups for Wallerian degeneration (P = 0.28 at day 14 and P = 0.22 at day 28) and perineural inflammation (P = 0.9 at day 14). Motor and sensory block durations were tested for each group. A statistical difference was observed for motor block duration between the RDPN group (150 minutes [127-172 minutes]), the RDS group (120 minutes [90-120 minutes]), and the R group (60 minutes [60-90 minutes]). Sensory block duration was also statistically different: 660 minutes (660-720 minutes) in the RDPN group, 480 minutes (427-660 minutes) in RDS group, 330 minutes (240-410) in the R group.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of ropivacaine and perineural dexamethasone allows longer sensory block duration compared with ropivacaine alone or ropivacaine and systemic dexamethasone, without increased neural toxicity.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在分析在小鼠中鞘内给予地塞米松联合罗哌卡因的组织神经毒性。鞘内给予地塞米松联合区域麻醉的疗效已得到明确证实。然而,该操作的安全性仍存在争议。

方法

对 90 只小鼠进行坐骨神经阻滞。这些实验共使用了 5 组,每组 18 只,随机分配:假手术组(等渗生理盐水)、R 组(鞘内罗哌卡因)、D 组(鞘内地塞米松)、RDPN 组(鞘内罗哌卡因和鞘内地塞米松)和 RDS 组(鞘内罗哌卡因和全身地塞米松)。在 14 小时内每 30 分钟评估感觉和运动阻滞。在该操作后 14 天和 28 天,每组处死 9 只小鼠进行坐骨神经组织学评估。

结果

各组的沃勒变性(第 14 天 P = 0.28,第 28 天 P = 0.22)和神经周围炎症(第 14 天 P = 0.9)无统计学差异。测试每组的运动和感觉阻滞持续时间。RDPN 组(150 分钟[127-172 分钟])、RDS 组(120 分钟[90-120 分钟])和 R 组(60 分钟[60-90 分钟])的运动阻滞持续时间存在统计学差异。感觉阻滞持续时间也有统计学差异:RDPN 组 660 分钟(660-720 分钟),RDS 组 480 分钟(427-660 分钟),R 组 330 分钟(240-410 分钟)。

结论

与单独使用罗哌卡因或罗哌卡因联合全身地塞米松相比,罗哌卡因联合鞘内地塞米松可延长感觉阻滞持续时间,而不会增加神经毒性。

相似文献

1
A New Step Toward Evidence of In Vivo Perineural Dexamethasone Safety: An Animal Study.迈向体内应用地塞米松安全性证据的新一步:一项动物研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Feb;43(2):180-185. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000392.
2
Morphological changes in the sciatic nerve, skeletal muscle, heart and brain of rabbits receiving continuous sciatic nerve block with 0.2% ropivacaine.接受0.2%罗哌卡因连续坐骨神经阻滞的家兔坐骨神经、骨骼肌、心脏和脑的形态学变化
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015 Nov 1;8(11):13911-20. eCollection 2015.
3
Local anesthetic sciatic nerve block and nerve fiber damage in diabetic rats.局部麻醉坐骨神经阻滞与糖尿病大鼠神经纤维损伤。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Jul-Aug;35(4):343-50. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3181e82df0.
4
A dose-ranging study of 0.5% bupivacaine or ropivacaine on the success and duration of the ultrasound-guided, nerve-stimulator-assisted sciatic nerve block: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial.一项关于 0.5%布比卡因或罗哌卡因在超声引导下神经刺激器辅助坐骨神经阻滞中的成功率和持续时间的剂量范围研究:一项双盲、随机临床试验。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;38(6):492-502. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182a4bddf.
5
Addition of Dexamethasone and Buprenorphine to Bupivacaine Sciatic Nerve Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial.在布比卡因坐骨神经阻滞中添加地塞米松和丁丙诺啡:一项随机对照试验。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):321-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000254.
6
I.V. and perineural dexamethasone are equivalent in increasing the analgesic duration of a single-shot interscalene block with ropivacaine for shoulder surgery: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study.静脉注射和神经周围地塞米松在增加罗哌卡因单次肌间沟阻滞用于肩部手术的镇痛持续时间方面等效:一项前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Sep;111(3):445-52. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet109. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
7
Perineural dexamethasone does not enhance the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane block during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.在腹腔镜胆囊切除术期间,神经周围注射地塞米松并不能增强超声引导下肋下腹横肌平面阻滞的镇痛效果。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2016 Oct;15(5):540-545. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(16)60086-3.
8
Thermal hyperalgesia after sciatic nerve block in rat is transient and clinically insignificant.坐骨神经阻滞后大鼠出现热痛觉过敏是短暂的,临床上无意义。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):151-4. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182813aae.
9
Dexamethasone as adjuvant to bupivacaine prolongs the duration of thermal antinociception and prevents bupivacaine-induced rebound hyperalgesia via regional mechanism in a mouse sciatic nerve block model.在小鼠坐骨神经阻滞模型中,地塞米松作为布比卡因的佐剂可延长热镇痛持续时间,并通过局部机制预防布比卡因诱导的痛觉过敏反弹。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 9;10(4):e0123459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123459. eCollection 2015.
10
Continuous Popliteal Sciatic Blocks: Does Varying Perineural Catheter Location Relative to the Sciatic Bifurcation Influence Block Effects? A Dual-Center, Randomized, Subject-Masked, Controlled Clinical Trial.连续腘窝坐骨神经阻滞:神经周围导管相对于坐骨神经分叉处的位置变化是否会影响阻滞效果?一项双中心、随机、受试者盲法、对照临床试验。
Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1689-95. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001211.

引用本文的文献

1
Perineural dexamethasone: neurotoxicity or neuroprotection? A systematic review of preclinical evidence.神经周围注射地塞米松:神经毒性还是神经保护作用?临床前证据的系统评价
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2025 Aug 6;5(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s44158-025-00271-w.
2
Comparing the Efficacy of Twin Mix and Lidocaine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blocks in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis.比较 Twin Mix 和利多卡因在下颌神经阻滞治疗症状性不可复性牙髓炎患者中的疗效。
Anesth Prog. 2020 Dec 1;67(4):207-213. doi: 10.2344/anpr-67-03-11.