Steidl Corinna, Bösel Julian, Suntrup-Krueger Sonja, Schönenberger Silvia, Al-Suwaidan Faisal, Warnecke Tobias, Minnerup Jens, Dziewas Rainer
Schoen Clinic Hamburg Eilbek, Hamburg, Germany.
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;44(1-2):1-9. doi: 10.1159/000471892. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
Both delayed and premature extubation increase complication rate, the need for tracheostomy (TT), the duration of intensive care unit stay, and mortality. In this study, we therefore investigated factors associated with primary TT and predictors for extubation failure (EF) in a sample of severely affected ventilated stroke patients.
One hundred eighty five intubated stroke patients were prospectively analyzed in this observational study. Patients not meeting predefined clinical and respiratory extubation criteria received a TT. All other patients were extubated and followed up for the need of reintubation. Characteristics of patients with and without extubation attempt were examined. Additionally, within the group of extubated patients, subgroups of successfully vs. unsuccessfully extubated patients were compared. Clinical factors associated with reintubation, including a previously established semi-quantitative airway score, were determined and predictors of EF were assessed.
Ninety-eight of 185 patients (53%) were primarily extubated; EF rate was 37% (36 patients). Eighty-seven (47%) were tracheostomized without a prior extubation attempt. Primarily tracheostomized patients had more severe strokes, which were more often hemorrhagic, presented with a lower level of consciousness, needed neurosurgical intervention more often, had a higher rate of obesity, and were more frequently intubated because of suspicion of compromised protective reflexes. EF was independently predicted by prior neurosurgical treatment and low airway management scores. No differences were found for the ability to follow simple commands and classical weaning criteria.
Airway management decisions in intubated stroke patients represent a clinical challenge. Classical weaning criteria and parameters reflecting the patient's state of consciousness are not reliably predictive of extubation success. Criteria more closely related to airway safety and secretion handling may provide the most relevant information and should therefore be assessed by specific clinical scoring systems.
延迟拔管和过早拔管均会增加并发症发生率、气管切开术(TT)需求、重症监护病房住院时间及死亡率。因此,在本研究中,我们调查了重度通气性卒中患者样本中与原发性TT相关的因素及拔管失败(EF)的预测因素。
在这项观察性研究中,对185例插管卒中患者进行了前瞻性分析。未达到预定义临床和呼吸拔管标准的患者接受了TT。所有其他患者均进行了拔管,并随访是否需要重新插管。检查了有或无拔管尝试患者的特征。此外,在拔管患者组中,比较了成功与未成功拔管患者的亚组。确定了与重新插管相关的临床因素,包括先前建立的半定量气道评分,并评估了EF的预测因素。
185例患者中有98例(53%)进行了初次拔管;EF率为37%(36例患者)。87例(47%)未进行事先拔管尝试即接受了气管切开术。初次接受气管切开术的患者卒中更严重,出血性卒中更常见,意识水平较低,更常需要神经外科干预,肥胖率更高,且因怀疑保护性反射受损而插管的频率更高。EF由先前的神经外科治疗和低气道管理评分独立预测。在执行简单指令的能力和经典撤机标准方面未发现差异。
插管卒中患者的气道管理决策是一项临床挑战。经典撤机标准和反映患者意识状态的参数不能可靠地预测拔管成功。与气道安全和分泌物处理更密切相关的标准可能提供最相关的信息,因此应由特定的临床评分系统进行评估。