1 Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hospital do Servidor Público Municipal, São Paulo, Brazil.
2 Division of Neonatology, Hospital e Maternidade Santa Joana, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Intensive Care Med. 2018 Aug;33(8):467-474. doi: 10.1177/0885066616675130. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
Reintubation following unplanned extubation (UE) is often required and associated with increased morbidity; however, knowledge of risk factors leading to reintubation and subsequent outcomes in children is still lacking. We sought to determine the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes related to reintubation after UEs.
All mechanically ventilated children were prospectively tracked for UEs over a 7-year period in a pediatric intensive care unit. For each UE event, data associated with reintubation within 24 hours and outcomes were collected.
Of 757 intubated patients, 87 UE occurred out of 11 335 intubation days (0.76 UE/100 intubation days), with 57 (65%) requiring reintubation. Most of the UEs that did not require reintubation were already weaning ventilator settings prior to UE (73%). Univariate analysis showed that younger children (<1 year) required reintubation more frequently after an UE. Patients experiencing UE during weaning experienced significantly fewer reintubations, whereas 90% of patients with full mechanical ventilation support required reintubation. Logistic regression revealed that requirement of full ventilator support (odds ratio: 37.5) and a COMFORT score <26 (odds ratio: 5.5) were associated with UE failure. There were no differences between reintubated and nonreintubated patients regarding the length of hospital stay, ventilator-associated pneumonia rate, need for tracheostomy, and mortality. Cardiovascular and respiratory complications were seen in 33% of the reintubations.
The rate of reintubation is high in children experiencing UE. Requirement of full ventilator support and a COMFORT score <26 are associated with reintubation. Prospective research is required to better understand the reintubation decisions and needs.
计划外拔管(UE)后再次插管通常是必需的,并与发病率增加相关;然而,导致再次插管的风险因素以及儿童后续结果的相关知识仍然缺乏。我们旨在确定 UE 后再次插管的发生率、风险因素和结果。
在儿科重症监护病房(PICU),对 7 年内所有接受机械通气的儿童进行前瞻性 UE 监测。对于每个 UE 事件,收集与 24 小时内再次插管和结局相关的数据。
在 757 例插管患者中,11335 次插管日中有 87 次 UE(0.76/100 次插管日),其中 57 例(65%)需要再次插管。大多数不需要再次插管的 UE 在此前已经在逐渐减少呼吸机设置(73%)。单因素分析显示,年龄较小(<1 岁)的儿童在 UE 后更频繁地需要再次插管。在脱机过程中发生 UE 的患者经历的再次插管明显较少,而 90%的接受完全机械通气支持的患者需要再次插管。Logistic 回归显示,需要完全呼吸机支持(比值比:37.5)和 COMFORT 评分<26(比值比:5.5)与 UE 失败相关。在住院时间、呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率、气管切开术需求和死亡率方面,再插管组和未再插管组之间没有差异。33%的再次插管出现心血管和呼吸系统并发症。
经历 UE 的儿童再次插管的发生率很高。需要完全呼吸机支持和 COMFORT 评分<26 与再次插管相关。需要前瞻性研究以更好地了解再次插管的决策和需求。