Streeter Anthony J, Faria Ellen C
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Spring House, PA and Raritan, NJ, USA.
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2017 Jun;220(4):659-672. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
The elderly constitute a significant, potentially sensitive, subpopulation within the general population, which must be taken into account when performing risk assessments including determining an acceptable daily exposure (ADE) for the purpose of a cleaning validation. Known differences in the pharmacokinetics of drugs between young adults (who are typically the subjects recruited into clinical trials) and the elderly are potential contributors affecting the interindividual uncertainty factor (UF) component of the ADE calculation. The UF values were calculated for 206 drugs for young adult and elderly groups separately and combined (with the elderly assumed to be a sensitive subpopulation) from published studies where the pharmacokinetics of the young adult and elderly groups were directly compared. Based on the analysis presented here, it is recommended to use a default UF value of 10 for worker populations (which are assumed to be approximately equivalent to the young adult groups) where no supporting pharmacokinetic data exist, while it is recommended to use a default UF value of 15 for the general population, to take the elderly into consideration when calculating ADE values. The underlying reasons for the large differences between the exposures in the young adult and elderly subjects for the 10 compounds which show the greatest separation are different in almost every case, involving the OCT2 transporter, glucuronidation, hydrolysis, CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 or CYP3A5. Therefore, there is no consistent underlying mechanism which appears responsible for the largest differences in pharmacokinetic parameters between young adult and elderly subjects.
老年人是普通人群中一个重要的、可能较为敏感的亚群体,在进行风险评估(包括为清洁验证确定可接受日暴露量[ADE])时必须予以考虑。年轻人(通常是参与临床试验的受试者)和老年人在药物药代动力学方面已知的差异,是影响ADE计算中个体间不确定系数(UF)部分的潜在因素。从已发表的研究中,分别计算了206种药物在年轻人组和老年人组中的UF值,并进行合并(假设老年人是敏感亚群体),这些研究直接比较了年轻人组和老年人组的药代动力学。基于此处给出的分析,建议在没有支持性药代动力学数据的情况下,对于工作人群(假设其大致等同于年轻人组)使用默认的UF值10,而对于普通人群,建议使用默认的UF值15,以便在计算ADE值时考虑到老年人。在显示出最大差异的10种化合物中,年轻人和老年人受试者暴露量之间存在巨大差异的根本原因几乎在每种情况下都不同,涉及有机阳离子转运体2(OCT2)、葡萄糖醛酸化、水解、细胞色素P450 1A2(CYP1A2)、细胞色素P450 2A6(CYP2A6)、细胞色素P450 2C19(CYP2C19)、细胞色素P450 2D6(CYP2D6)、细胞色素P450 3A4(CYP3A4)或细胞色素P450 3A5(CYP3A5)。因此,似乎没有一致的潜在机制导致年轻人和老年人受试者在药代动力学参数上的最大差异。