From AMC Heart Center, Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (F.V.Y.T.); and Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (V.Y.R.).
Circulation. 2017 Apr 11;135(15):1458-1470. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025037.
A new technology, leadless pacemaker therapy, was recently introduced clinically to address lead- and pocket-related complications in conventional transvenous pacemaker therapy. These leadless devices are self-contained right ventricular single-chamber pacemakers implanted by using a femoral percutaneous approach. In this review of available clinical data on leadless pacemakers, early results with leadless devices are compared with historical results with conventional single-chamber pacing. Both presently manufactured leadless pacemakers show similar complications, which are mostly related to the implant procedure: cardiac perforation, device dislocation, and femoral vascular access site complications. In comparison with conventional transvenous single-chamber pacemakers, slightly higher short-term complication rates have been observed: 4.8% for leadless pacemakers versus 4.1% for conventional pacemakers. The complication rate of the leadless pacemakers is influenced by the implanter learning curve for this new procedure. No long-term outcome data are yet available for the leadless pacemakers. Larger leadless pacing trials, with long-term follow-up and direct randomized comparison with conventional pacing systems, will be required to define the proper clinical role of these leadless systems. Although current leadless pacemakers are limited to right ventricular pacing, future advanced, communicating, multicomponent systems are expected to expand the potential benefits of leadless therapy to a larger patient population.
一种新的技术,无导线起搏器治疗,最近在临床上被引入,以解决传统经静脉起搏器治疗中与导线和囊袋相关的并发症。这些无导线装置是自含式右心室单腔起搏器,通过股动脉经皮途径植入。在对现有无导线起搏器临床数据的回顾中,将无导线装置的早期结果与传统单腔起搏的历史结果进行了比较。目前制造的两种无导线起搏器显示出相似的并发症,这些并发症主要与植入程序有关:心脏穿孔、器械脱位和股血管入路部位并发症。与传统经静脉单腔起搏器相比,观察到略高的短期并发症发生率:无导线起搏器为 4.8%,传统起搏器为 4.1%。无导线起搏器的并发症发生率受该新程序植入者学习曲线的影响。目前尚无无导线起搏器的长期结果数据。需要进行更大规模的无导线起搏试验,进行长期随访,并与传统起搏系统进行直接随机比较,以确定这些无导线系统的适当临床作用。尽管目前的无导线起搏器仅限于右心室起搏,但未来先进的、可通讯的、多组件系统有望将无导线治疗的潜在益处扩展到更大的患者群体。