Commissaire Eva, Casalis Séverine
1 Laboratoire de Psychologie des Cognitions (LPC-EA4440), Faculté de Psychologie, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
2 SCALab (UMR CNRS 9193), Université de Lille, Villeneuve-d'Ascq, France.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Jun;71(6):1324-1339. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1318294. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
This work aimed to investigate grapheme coding during sub-lexical processing and lexical access. Using the letter detection task in Experiment 1, we compared letter pairs that could be considered as a grapheme unit or not depending on context (referred to as weakly cohesive complex, e.g., an in chant vs cane) to real two-letter graphemes (highly cohesive complex, e.g., au in chaud) and single-letter graphemes (simple, e.g., a in place). Three experimental conditions were used, one of which was designed to prevent phonological influences. Data revealed that only highly cohesive complex graphemes were processed as units, not the weakly cohesive ones. The same pattern was found across experimental conditions in favor of an orthographic mechanism. In Experiments 2 and 3, a primed lexical decision task was used with two stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) and two different ranges of lexical frequency. We manipulated the number of graphemes removed from partial primes ( dche vs dohe-DOUCHE) and relatedness. In contrast to Experiment 1, no evidence was provided in favor of a role of graphemes during lexical access. We suggest that graphemes can be conceived as sub-lexical orthographic units per se but can only be captured within a sub-lexical route to reading.
这项研究旨在探究次词汇加工和词汇通达过程中的字素编码。在实验1中,我们使用字母检测任务,将根据语境可被视为字素单元或不可被视为字素单元的字母对(称为弱连贯复合体,例如chant中的an与cane)与真正的双字母字素(高连贯复合体,例如chaud中的au)和单字母字素(简单字素,例如place中的a)进行比较。我们采用了三种实验条件,其中一种旨在防止语音影响。数据显示,只有高连贯复合体字素被作为单元进行加工,弱连贯复合体字素则不然。在所有实验条件下均发现了相同的模式,支持一种正字法机制。在实验2和3中,我们使用了启动式词汇判断任务,设置了两种刺激起始时间间隔(SOA)以及两种不同的词汇频率范围。我们操纵了从部分启动词中去除的字素数量(dche与dohe - DOUCHE)以及相关性。与实验1不同的是,没有证据支持字素在词汇通达过程中发挥作用。我们认为,字素本身可被视为次词汇正字法单元,但只能在次词汇阅读路径中被捕捉到。