Suppr超能文献

[顺势疗法药品与门诊诊所:它们在欺骗公众吗?]

[Homeopathic drug products and outpatient clinics: are they deceiving the public?].

作者信息

Garattini Silvio

机构信息

IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milano.

出版信息

Recenti Prog Med. 2017 Mar;108(3):117-119. doi: 10.1701/2656.27233.

Abstract

After more than two centuries since the inception of homeopathy, it can now be stated that active ingredients of homeopathic drug products are approaching zero. Homeopathy has never been shown to be effective, and several Cochrane reviews failed to provide evidence for the effectiveness of homeopathy. In addition, according to the World Health Organization, when homeopathic medicine is used as an alternative to other effective treatments, it may cause harm resulting in increased mortality. On the basis of these considerations, it is of utmost importance that millions of Italian people taking homeopathic remedies be informed on the negative judgment by the scientific community, so that allocation of limited healthcare resources can be better redirected to increase patient access to treatments not otherwise available due to restrictions on healthcare budgets (e.g. hepatitis C medications).

摘要

自顺势疗法创立两个多世纪以来,如今可以说顺势疗法药品的活性成分已趋近于零。顺势疗法从未被证明有效,多项考克兰系统评价也未能提供顺势疗法有效性的证据。此外,根据世界卫生组织的说法,当顺势疗法药物被用作其他有效治疗方法的替代品时,可能会造成危害,导致死亡率上升。基于这些考虑,至关重要的是要让数百万服用顺势疗法药物的意大利民众了解科学界的负面评价,以便更好地重新分配有限的医疗资源,增加患者获得因医疗预算限制而无法获得的其他治疗方法(例如丙型肝炎药物)的机会。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验