Hussain Mohammed, Datta Neil, Cheng Zhe, Dornbos David, Bashir Asif, Sultan Ibrahim, Mehta Tapan, Shweikeh Faris, Mazaris Paul, Lee Nora, Nouh Amre, Geng Xiaokun, Ding Yuchuan
1Department of Neurology, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT 06030, USA.
2Department of Neurology, Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101149, China.
Aging Dis. 2017 Apr 1;8(2):196-202. doi: 10.14336/AD.2016.0807. eCollection 2017 Apr.
Ischemic stroke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, incurring significant cost. Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) accounts for 10-15% of ischemic stroke in Western societies, but is an underlying pathology in up to 54% of ischemic strokes in Asian populations. ICAD has largely been treated with medical management, although a few studies have examined outcomes following endovascular treatment. Our objective was to summarize the major trials that have been performed thus far in regard to the endovascular treatment of ICAD and to provide direction for future management of this disease process. Systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 2015, was conducted in regard to intracranial angioplasty and stenting. Studies were analyzed from PubMed, American Heart Association and Society of Neurointerventional Surgery databases. SAMMPRIS and VISSIT are the only randomized controlled trials from which Western guidelines of intracranial stenting have been derived, which have displayed the superiority of medical management. However, pooled reviews of smaller studies and other nonrandomized trials have shown better outcomes with endovascular therapy in select patient subsets, such as intracranial vertebrobasilar stenosis or in the presence of robust collaterals. Suboptimal cases, including longer lesions, bifurcations and significant tortuosity tend to fair better with medical management. Medical management has been shown to be more efficacious with less adverse outcomes than endovascular therapy. However, the majority of studies on endovascular management included a diverse patient population without ideal selection criteria, resulting in higher adverse outcomes. Population analyses and selective utilization of endovascular therapy have shown that the treatment may be superior to other management in select patients.
缺血性中风是发病和死亡的主要原因,造成巨大成本。颅内动脉粥样硬化疾病(ICAD)在西方社会的缺血性中风中占10%-15%,但在亚洲人群中高达54%的缺血性中风中是潜在病理。ICAD主要通过药物治疗,尽管有一些研究探讨了血管内治疗后的结果。我们的目的是总结迄今为止关于ICAD血管内治疗的主要试验,并为该疾病进程的未来管理提供方向。对1966年至2015年有关颅内血管成形术和支架置入术的文献进行了系统回顾。从PubMed、美国心脏协会和神经介入外科学会数据库中分析研究。SAMMPRIS和VISSIT是仅有的从中得出颅内支架置入西方指南的随机对照试验,这些试验显示了药物治疗的优越性。然而,对较小研究和其他非随机试验的汇总综述表明,在特定患者亚组中,如颅内椎基底动脉狭窄或存在强大侧支循环时,血管内治疗有更好的结果。包括病变较长、分叉和显著迂曲等不理想情况,药物治疗往往效果更好。已证明药物治疗比血管内治疗更有效,不良后果更少。然而,大多数关于血管内治疗的研究纳入了不同的患者群体,没有理想的选择标准,导致不良后果更高。人群分析和血管内治疗的选择性应用表明,在特定患者中,该治疗可能优于其他治疗方法。