• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of adjunct tirofiban treatment following mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) resulting in successful reperfusion.机械取栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中伴大血管闭塞(LVO)患者成功再通后,联用替罗非班的安全性和有效性。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Oct;30(5):657-662. doi: 10.1177/15910199221138883. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
2
Effect of Intravenous Tirofiban Versus Placebo on First-Pass Successful Reperfusion in Endovascular Stroke Thrombectomy: Insights From the RESCUE BT Randomized Clinical Trial.血管内血栓切除术治疗急性缺血性脑卒中患者中静脉注射替罗非班与安慰剂对首次再通效果的影响:来自 RESCUE BT 随机临床试验的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Nov 5;13(21):e036350. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036350. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
3
Safety and Efficacy of Tirofiban During Mechanical Thrombectomy for Stroke Patients with Preceding Intravenous Thrombolysis.替罗非班在静脉溶栓治疗后行机械取栓的卒中患者中的安全性和疗效。
Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Jul 23;15:1241-1248. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S238769. eCollection 2020.
4
The Efficacy and Safety of Tirofiban Use in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Intravenous Thrombolysis Applicable Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke-a Post Hoc Analysis from the Direct-MT Trial.替罗非班用于血管内血栓切除术治疗大血管闭塞性卒中静脉溶栓适用患者的疗效和安全性:来自 DIRECT-MT 试验的事后分析。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024 Feb;47(2):208-215. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03540-9. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
5
Preoperative and intraoperative tirofiban during endovascular thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion stroke due to large artery atherosclerosis.大动脉粥样硬化所致大血管闭塞性卒中血管内血栓切除术中术前和术中替罗非班的应用。
Eur J Neurol. 2024 Oct;31(10):e16419. doi: 10.1111/ene.16419. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
6
Association of tirofiban with improvement of functional outcomes of direct thrombectomy for acute anterior circulation occlusion: a retrospective, nonrandomized, multicenter, real-world study.替罗非班与直接机械取栓治疗急性前循环闭塞患者功能结局改善的相关性:一项回顾性、非随机、多中心、真实世界研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Oct;55(4):E21. doi: 10.3171/2023.7.FOCUS23150.
7
Predictors of outcome in large vessel occlusion stroke patients with intravenous tirofiban treatment: a post hoc analysis of the RESCUE BT clinical trial.静脉注射替罗非班治疗大动脉闭塞性卒中患者结局的预测因素:RES-CUE BT 临床试验的事后分析。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Jul 1;24(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03733-w.
8
Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of tirofiban in patients with acute ischaemic stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy.替罗非班治疗急性缺血性脑卒中机械取栓患者的疗效及安全性的 Meta 分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2023 May;228:107702. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107702. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
9
Safety and efficacy of tirofiban combined with endovascular treatment in acute ischaemic stroke.替罗非班联合血管内治疗在急性缺血性脑卒中中的安全性和有效性。
Eur J Neurol. 2019 Aug;26(8):1105-1110. doi: 10.1111/ene.13946. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
10
Effect of Intravenous Tirofiban vs Placebo Before Endovascular Thrombectomy on Functional Outcomes in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: The RESCUE BT Randomized Clinical Trial.血管内血栓切除术治疗前静脉注射替罗非班与安慰剂对大血管闭塞性脑卒中患者功能结局的影响:RESCUE BT 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Aug 9;328(6):543-553. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.12584.

引用本文的文献

1
Tirofiban in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Mechanistic Rationale, Clinical Advances, and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.替罗非班在急性缺血性卒中中的应用:作用机制、临床进展及新兴治疗策略
Drugs. 2025 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s40265-025-02222-9.
2
Mechanical thrombectomy combined with tirofiban for treatment of acute intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction: clinical observations and effect on serum inflammatory factors.机械取栓联合替罗非班治疗急性颅内动脉粥样硬化性脑梗死:临床观察及对血清炎症因子的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Jul 25;17(7):5689-5697. doi: 10.62347/FJGC1286. eCollection 2025.
3
An interpretable machine learning model for stroke recurrence in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic arterial stenosis.一种用于有症状颅内动脉粥样硬化性动脉狭窄患者卒中复发的可解释机器学习模型。
Front Neurosci. 2024 Jan 8;17:1323270. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1323270. eCollection 2023.
4
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of adjunctive use of tirofiban in patients treated with endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke at different embolic sites.系统评价和荟萃分析替罗非班辅助治疗不同栓塞部位急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗的疗效和安全性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Oct 6;102(40):e35091. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035091.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Intra-arterial Alteplase vs Placebo Following Successful Thrombectomy on Functional Outcomes in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Acute Ischemic Stroke: The CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial.成功取栓后动脉内注射阿替普酶与安慰剂对大血管闭塞性急性缺血性脑卒中患者功能结局的影响:CHOICE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Mar 1;327(9):826-835. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.1645.
2
Prevalence and Significance of Impaired Microvascular Tissue Reperfusion Despite Macrovascular Angiographic Reperfusion (No-Reflow).尽管大血管血管造影再通(无再流),但存在微血管组织再灌注受损的患病率和意义(No-Reflow)。
Neurology. 2022 Feb 22;98(8):e790-e801. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013210. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
3
Safety and Efficacy of Tirofiban During Mechanical Thrombectomy for Stroke Patients with Preceding Intravenous Thrombolysis.替罗非班在静脉溶栓治疗后行机械取栓的卒中患者中的安全性和疗效。
Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Jul 23;15:1241-1248. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S238769. eCollection 2020.
4
Low-dose rescue tirofiban in mechanical thrombectomy for acute cerebral large-artery occlusion.低剂量挽救性替罗非班用于急性大脑大动脉闭塞机械取栓术
Eur J Neurol. 2020 Jun;27(6):1056-1061. doi: 10.1111/ene.14170. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
5
Pericytes: A Novel Target to Improve Success of Recanalization Therapies.周细胞:提高再通治疗成功率的新靶点。
Stroke. 2019 Oct;50(10):2985-2991. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023590. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
6
Safety and efficacy of tirofiban combined with endovascular treatment in acute ischaemic stroke.替罗非班联合血管内治疗在急性缺血性脑卒中中的安全性和有效性。
Eur J Neurol. 2019 Aug;26(8):1105-1110. doi: 10.1111/ene.13946. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
7
Factors that may contribute to poor outcome despite good reperfusion after acute endovascular stroke therapy.尽管急性血管内卒中治疗后再灌注良好,但仍可能导致预后不良的因素。
Int J Stroke. 2019 Jan;14(1):23-31. doi: 10.1177/1747493018799979. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
8
Pretreatment lesional volume impacts clinical outcome and thrombectomy efficacy.预处理病灶容积影响临床结局和取栓效果。
Ann Neurol. 2018 Jan;83(1):178-185. doi: 10.1002/ana.25133.
9
Spanning from the West to East: An Updated Review on Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease.从西到东:颅内动脉粥样硬化疾病血管内治疗的最新综述
Aging Dis. 2017 Apr 1;8(2):196-202. doi: 10.14336/AD.2016.0807. eCollection 2017 Apr.
10
Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of Early Tirofiban Treatment After Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients.急性缺血性脑卒中患者阿替普酶溶栓后早期替罗非班治疗的安全性和初步疗效。
Stroke. 2016 Oct;47(10):2649-51. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014413. Epub 2016 Sep 8.

机械取栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中伴大血管闭塞(LVO)患者成功再通后,联用替罗非班的安全性和有效性。

Safety and efficacy of adjunct tirofiban treatment following mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) resulting in successful reperfusion.

机构信息

Department of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

出版信息

Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Oct;30(5):657-662. doi: 10.1177/15910199221138883. Epub 2022 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1177/15910199221138883
PMID:36358016
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11569474/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Tirofiban administration after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of adjunct tirofiban treatment following MT for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) that resulted in successful reperfusion on digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in Zhengzhou University University People's Hospital, an advanced stroke center in China. Consecutive patients with AIS who underwent endovascular therapy (EVT) were enrolled from June 2018 to January 2022. The safety endpoints were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), total intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and 3-month mortality. The efficacy endpoints were 3-month modified Rankin scale (mRS) score and 24-h neurological improvement.

RESULTS

A total of 145 consecutive patients with AIS who underwent MT were analyzed, of whom 51 (35.2%) patients were in the tirofiban group. There were 30 (20.7%) patients with sICH, 50 (34.5%) patients suffered from ICH within 24-h post-MT, and 47 (32.4%) dead at 3-month. Besides, 31 (21.4%) patients achieved excellent clinical outcomes (mRS, 0-1), and 24-h neurological improvement was found in 29 (20.0%) patients. No statistically significant differences were found in safety outcomes on sICH, total ICH, and 3-month mortality, as well as efficacy outcomes on 3-month mRS scores (0-1) and 24-h neurological improvement between the two groups ( > 0.05 for all). Additionally, tirofiban was associated with 3-month mRS scores of 0-2 (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 3.75; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.41-10.02,  = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Adjunct tirofiban treatment following MT for AIS patients with LVO that resulted in successful reperfusion on DSA was not correlated with the increased risk of safety endpoints on sICH, ICH, and 3-month mortality, and it may be associated with a lower 3-month mRS score.

摘要

背景与目的

机械血栓切除术后(MT)给予替罗非班的治疗仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨替罗非班辅助治疗对接受血管内治疗(EVT)的急性缺血性卒中(AIS)伴大血管闭塞(LVO)患者的疗效和安全性,这些患者的数字减影血管造影(DSA)显示再通成功。

方法

这是一项在中国先进卒中中心——郑州大学人民医院进行的回顾性研究。连续纳入 2018 年 6 月至 2022 年 1 月接受 EVT 的 AIS 患者。安全性终点为症状性颅内出血(sICH)、总颅内出血(ICH)和 3 个月死亡率。有效性终点为 3 个月改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分和 24 小时神经功能改善。

结果

共分析了 145 例接受 MT 的 AIS 连续患者,其中替罗非班组 51 例(35.2%)。30 例(20.7%)发生 sICH,50 例(34.5%)患者在 MT 后 24 小时内发生 ICH,47 例(32.4%)患者在 3 个月时死亡。此外,31 例(21.4%)患者获得了良好的临床结局(mRS,0-1),29 例(20.0%)患者在 24 小时时神经功能改善。两组间 sICH、总 ICH 和 3 个月死亡率以及 3 个月 mRS 评分(0-1)和 24 小时神经功能改善等安全性结局以及有效性结局差异均无统计学意义(所有 P 值均>0.05)。此外,替罗非班与 3 个月 mRS 评分 0-2 相关(校正优势比(OR)3.75,95%置信区间(CI)1.41-10.02,P=0.008)。

结论

DSA 显示再通成功的 LVO AIS 患者,在 MT 后给予替罗非班治疗与增加 sICH、ICH 和 3 个月死亡率的安全性终点无关,且可能与较低的 3 个月 mRS 评分相关。