Shear Torin D, Deshur Mark, Lapin Brittany, Greenberg Steven B, Murphy Glenn S, Szokol Joseph, Ujiki Michael, Newmark Rebecca, Benson Jessica, Koress Cody, Dwyer Connor, Vender Jeffery
Department of Anesthesiology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, 2650 Ridge Ave, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.
Center for Biomedical Research Informatics, NorthShore University HealthSystem Research Institute, Evanston, IL, USA.
J Med Syst. 2017 May;41(5):86. doi: 10.1007/s10916-017-0737-0. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
In this study, we examined anesthetic records before and after the implementation of an electronic anesthetic record documentation (AIMS) in a single surgical population. The purpose of this study was to identify any inconsistencies in anesthetic care based on handwritten documentation (paper) or AIMS. We hypothesized that the type of anesthetic record (paper or AIMS) would lead to differences in the documentation and management of hypotension. Consecutive patients who underwent esophageal surgery between 2009 and 2014 by a single surgeon were eligible for the study. Patients were grouped in to 'paper' or 'AIMS' based on the type of anesthetic record identified in the chart. Pertinent patient identifiers were removed and data collated after collection. Predetermined preoperative and intraoperative data variables were reviewed. Consecutive esophageal surgery patients (N = 189) between 2009 and 2014 were evaluated. 92 patients had an anesthetic record documented on paper and 97 using AIMS. The median number of unique blood pressure recordings was lower in the AIMS group (median (Q1,Q3) AIMS 30.0 (24.0, 39.0) vs. Paper 35.0 (28.5, 43.5), p < 0.01). However, the median number of hypotensive events (HTEs) was higher in the AIMS group (median (Q1,Q3) 8.0 (4.0, 18.0) vs. 4.0 (1.0, 10.5), p < 0.001), and the percentage of HTEs per blood pressure recording was higher in the AIMS group (30.4 ((Q1, Q3) (9.5, 60.9)% vs. 12.5 (2.4, 27.5)%), p < 0.01). Multivariable regression analysis identified independent predictors of HTEs. The incidence of HTEs was found to increase with AIMS (IRR = 1.88, p < 0.01). Preoperative systolic blood pressure, increased blood loss, and phenylephrine. A phenylephrine infusion was negatively associated with hypotensive events (IRR = 0.99, p = 0.03). We noted an increased incidence of HTEs associated with the institution of an AIMS. Despite this increase, no change in medical therapy for hypotension was seen. AIMS did not appear to have an effect on the management of intraoperative hypotension in this patient population.
在本研究中,我们检查了在单一手术人群中实施电子麻醉记录文档系统(AIMS)前后的麻醉记录。本研究的目的是确定基于手写文档(纸质)或AIMS的麻醉护理中是否存在任何不一致之处。我们假设麻醉记录的类型(纸质或AIMS)会导致低血压记录和管理的差异。2009年至2014年由单一外科医生进行食管手术的连续患者符合本研究条件。根据病历中确定的麻醉记录类型,将患者分为“纸质”或“AIMS”组。去除相关患者标识符并在收集后整理数据。对预定的术前和术中数据变量进行了审查。对2009年至2014年连续的食管手术患者(N = 189)进行了评估。92例患者有纸质麻醉记录,97例使用AIMS。AIMS组唯一血压记录的中位数较低(中位数(Q1,Q3)AIMS为30.0(24.0,39.0),纸质为35.0(28.5,43.5),p < 0.01)。然而,AIMS组低血压事件(HTE)的中位数较高(中位数(Q1,Q3)8.0(4.0,18.0)对4.0(1.0,10.5),p < 0.001),且AIMS组每血压记录的HTE百分比更高(30.4((Q1,Q3)(9.5,60.9)%对12.5(2.4,27.5)%),p < 0.01)。多变量回归分析确定了HTE的独立预测因素。发现HTE的发生率随AIMS增加(IRR = 1.88,p < 0.01)。术前收缩压、失血增加和去氧肾上腺素。去氧肾上腺素输注与低血压事件呈负相关(IRR = 0.99,p = 0.03)。我们注意到与AIMS实施相关的HTE发生率增加。尽管有这种增加,但低血压的药物治疗未见变化。AIMS似乎对该患者群体术中低血压的管理没有影响。