• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较Tight Rope技术与锁骨钩钢板治疗RockwoodⅢ型肩锁关节脱位的疗效

Comparison of the Tight Rope Technique and Clavicular Hook Plate for the Treatment of Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.

作者信息

Cai Leyi, Wang Te, Lu Di, Hu Wei, Hong Jianjun, Chen Hua

机构信息

a Department of Orthopaedic Surgery , The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , China .

出版信息

J Invest Surg. 2018 Jun;31(3):226-233. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1305022. Epub 2017 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1080/08941939.2017.1305022
PMID:28402702
Abstract

AIM

Acromioclavicular joint dislocation is one of the most common shoulder problems and may lead to instability or degenerative changes. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of the Tight Rope system and clavicular hook plate for Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation in adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized study in a hospital setting. From January 2012 to December 2014, 69 patients with type III injury were reviewed. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group A was treated using the TightRope system and Group B with the clavicular hook plate. All participants were followed up for 12 months. Clinical outcomes, radiological results and postoperative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

The length of incision was significantly shorter in Goup A than that in Group B. The blood loss of surgery was significantly less in the Group A. Significant difference could be found between the two groups regarding the Visual Analogue Scale scores one day after surgery, at the 3 and 12 months follow-up. There were no differences according to the improvement of the Constant-Murley score and the coracoclavicular distance between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The two groups have similar clinical and radiological outcomes. Both treatments could relieve the pain of dislocation, improve the function of Acromioclavicular joint and rectify the coracoclavicular distance measured in plain films. However, the TightRope system exhibited some advantages in terms of length of incision, blood loss of surgery, the pain postoperatively and no need for a second surgery.

摘要

目的

肩锁关节脱位是最常见的肩部问题之一,可能导致不稳定或退行性改变。本研究的目的是比较Tight Rope系统和锁骨钩钢板治疗成人Rockwood III型肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效。

材料与方法

这是一项在医院环境中进行的前瞻性随机研究。回顾了2012年1月至2014年12月期间69例III型损伤患者。患者随机分为两组:A组采用TightRope系统治疗,B组采用锁骨钩钢板治疗。所有参与者均随访12个月。记录临床疗效、影像学结果和术后并发症。

结果

A组切口长度明显短于B组。A组手术失血量明显较少。两组在术后1天、3个月和12个月随访时的视觉模拟量表评分存在显著差异。两组在Constant-Murley评分改善和喙锁距离方面无差异。

结论

两组的临床和影像学结果相似。两种治疗方法均可缓解脱位疼痛,改善肩锁关节功能,并纠正X线平片测量提示的喙锁距离。然而,TightRope系统在切口长度、手术失血量、术后疼痛以及无需二次手术方面表现出一些优势。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Tight Rope Technique and Clavicular Hook Plate for the Treatment of Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.比较Tight Rope技术与锁骨钩钢板治疗RockwoodⅢ型肩锁关节脱位的疗效
J Invest Surg. 2018 Jun;31(3):226-233. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1305022. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
2
[Single mini-incision combined with honeycomb titanium plate in treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation].[单小切口联合蜂窝钛板治疗急性肩锁关节脱位]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2024 Jun 25;37(6):5765-82. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20230268.
3
Comparison of clinical efficacy between arthroscopically assisted Tight-Rope technique and clavicular hook plate fixation in treating acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations.关节镜辅助下 Tight-Rope 技术与锁骨钩钢板治疗急性高分级肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效比较。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2021 May-Aug;29(2):23094990211010562. doi: 10.1177/23094990211010562.
4
Clinical and radiological outcomes of acute Rookwood type IIIB acromioclavicular joint dislocation: Mini-open tightrope technique versus hook plate.急性Rookwood IIIB型肩锁关节脱位的临床及影像学结果:微创拉紧带技术与钩钢板的对比
Injury. 2023 Apr;54 Suppl 2:S63-S69. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.02.019. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
5
Comparison of clavicular hook plate with and without coracoclavicular suture fixation for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.带与不带喙锁韧带缝合固定的锁骨钩钢板治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的比较
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019 Nov;53(6):408-413. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
6
[Treatment of severe acromioclavicular joint dislocation with double strand titanium cable and clavicular hook plate guided by self-made guide device].自制导向装置引导下双股钛缆与锁骨钩钢板治疗重度肩锁关节脱位
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2021 Mar 25;34(3):237-42. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.03.010.
7
TightRope vs Clavicular Hook Plate for Rockwood III-V Acromioclavicular Dislocations: A Meta-Analysis.TightRope 与锁骨钩钢板治疗 Rockwood III-V 型肩锁关节脱位:一项荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Aug;12(4):1045-1052. doi: 10.1111/os.12724. Epub 2020 Jul 19.
8
[Case-control study on therapeutic effects between modified Weaver-Dunn surgery and clavicular hook plate fixation in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation].改良Weaver-Dunn手术与锁骨钩钢板内固定治疗肩锁关节脱位疗效的病例对照研究
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2014 Jan;27(1):4-8.
9
[Case control study on the treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation with Endobutton plates combined with an anchor].Endobutton钢板联合锚钉治疗肩锁关节脱位的病例对照研究
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2016 Sep 25;29(9):841-846. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2016.09.014.
10
Surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation of Rockwood III/IV: a retrospective study on clavicular hook plate versus arthroscopic TightRope loop titanium button.Rockwood III/IV 型肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗:锁骨钩钢板与关节镜下 TightRope 环形钛板纽扣对比的回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Feb 26;25(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07269-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Tightrope vs. hook plate fixation for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性肩锁关节脱位的钛缆与钩钢板固定:一项系统评价与Meta分析
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2025 Apr 30;5(3):477-486. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.04.002. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Comparison of endobutton and tendon graft techniques in acromioclavicular joint dislocation: Early treatment yields better outcomes.肩锁关节脱位中纽扣钢板与肌腱移植技术的比较:早期治疗效果更佳。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 13;104(24):e42879. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042879.
3
Comparison of Double Endobutton and Clavicular Hook Plate in Acromioclavicular Joint Disruption: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
双Endobutton与锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Ann Afr Med. 2024 Oct 1;23(4):535-547. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_13_24. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
4
Surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation of Rockwood III/IV: a retrospective study on clavicular hook plate versus arthroscopic TightRope loop titanium button.Rockwood III/IV 型肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗:锁骨钩钢板与关节镜下 TightRope 环形钛板纽扣对比的回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Feb 26;25(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07269-5.
5
3D C-arm navigated acromioclavicular joint stabilization.3D C 臂导航肩锁关节稳定术。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Feb;144(2):601-610. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05112-5. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
6
Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety in Treating Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation with Five Different Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.五种不同手术治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的有效性和安全性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Aug;15(8):1944-1958. doi: 10.1111/os.13731. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
7
SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION: HOOK PLATE VERSUS SUTURE BUTTON.肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗:钩钢板与缝线纽扣钢板的比较
Acta Ortop Bras. 2023 Apr 17;31(spe1):e252916. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220233101e252916. eCollection 2023.
8
Clavicular hook plate versus dog-bone technique for acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a retrospective cohort study comparing clinical outcome scores, complications, and costs.锁骨钩钢板与狗骨技术治疗急性高分级肩锁关节脱位的对比:一项回顾性队列研究比较临床结局评分、并发症和成本。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Aug;143(8):5007-5014. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04856-4. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
9
Clinical outcomes for grades III-V acromioclavicular dislocations favor double-button fixation compared to clavicle hook plate fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肩锁关节脱位 III-V 度患者的临床疗效,双纽扣固定优于锁骨钩钢板固定:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Oct;33(7):2831-2846. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03492-3. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
10
Open Double-Button Technique is Superior to Hook Plate in the Treatment of Acute Rockwood Type III/V Acromioclavicular Dislocations.双纽扣技术在治疗急性 Rockwood Ⅲ/Ⅴ型肩锁关节脱位方面优于钩钢板。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Jun;28(6):839-848. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.45985.