From the Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas (M.P.), and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (F.P.) - both in Texas; Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA (C.O.); the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (J.J.V.M., M.C.P.); Statistics Collaborative, Washington, DC (J.W., L.S.K., M.S.); Ohio State University Heart and Vascular Center, Columbus (W.T.A.); Innovative Clinical Trials, Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany (S.A.); the Division of Cardiology, University of Bergen, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway (K.D.); Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (G.F.); private consultant, Wayzata, MN (R.H.); Centre of Cardiovascular Research and Education in Therapeutics, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (H.K.); Centro Studi, Associazione Nazionale Medici Cardiologi Ospedalieri, Fondazione Per il Tuo Cuore HCF ONLUS, Florence, Italy (A.P.M.); University Paris 7 Diderot, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Saint-Louis Lariboisière, U 942 INSERM, Paris (A.M.); Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland (P.P.); the Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich (F.R., J.H.), and Cardiorentis, Zug (J.H.) - both in Switzerland; and the University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (D.J.V.).
N Engl J Med. 2017 May 18;376(20):1956-1964. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1601895. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
In patients with acute heart failure, early intervention with an intravenous vasodilator has been proposed as a therapeutic goal to reduce cardiac-wall stress and, potentially, myocardial injury, thereby favorably affecting patients' long-term prognosis.
In this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 2157 patients with acute heart failure to receive a continuous intravenous infusion of either ularitide at a dose of 15 ng per kilogram of body weight per minute or matching placebo for 48 hours, in addition to accepted therapy. Treatment was initiated a median of 6 hours after the initial clinical evaluation. The coprimary outcomes were death from cardiovascular causes during a median follow-up of 15 months and a hierarchical composite end point that evaluated the initial 48-hour clinical course.
Death from cardiovascular causes occurred in 236 patients in the ularitide group and 225 patients in the placebo group (21.7% vs. 21.0%; hazard ratio, 1.03; 96% confidence interval, 0.85 to 1.25; P=0.75). In the intention-to-treat analysis, there was no significant between-group difference with respect to the hierarchical composite outcome. The ularitide group had greater reductions in systolic blood pressure and in levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide than the placebo group. However, changes in cardiac troponin T levels during the infusion did not differ between the two groups in the 55% of patients with paired data.
In patients with acute heart failure, ularitide exerted favorable physiological effects (without affecting cardiac troponin levels), but short-term treatment did not affect a clinical composite end point or reduce long-term cardiovascular mortality. (Funded by Cardiorentis; TRUE-AHF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01661634 .).
在急性心力衰竭患者中,早期应用静脉血管扩张剂被提议作为一种治疗目标,以降低心脏壁的压力,从而可能减轻心肌损伤,进而对患者的长期预后产生有利影响。
在这项双盲试验中,我们将 2157 名急性心力衰竭患者随机分为两组,分别接受每分钟 15 纳克/千克体重的乌利特利德静脉滴注或匹配的安慰剂,持续 48 小时,同时接受标准治疗。治疗在初始临床评估后中位数 6 小时开始。主要复合终点是 15 个月的中位随访期间心血管原因导致的死亡,以及评估初始 48 小时临床过程的分层复合终点。
乌利特利德组有 236 例患者死于心血管原因,安慰剂组有 225 例患者(21.7% vs. 21.0%;风险比,1.03;96%置信区间,0.85 至 1.25;P=0.75)。在意向治疗分析中,两组在分层复合终点方面没有显著差异。与安慰剂组相比,乌利特利德组的收缩压和 N 末端脑钠肽前体水平降低幅度更大。然而,在有配对数据的 55%患者中,输注期间心脏肌钙蛋白 T 水平的变化在两组之间没有差异。
在急性心力衰竭患者中,乌利特利德产生了有利的生理效应(不影响心脏肌钙蛋白水平),但短期治疗并未影响临床复合终点或降低长期心血管死亡率。(由 Cardiorentis 资助;TRUE-AHF ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT01661634)。