• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对涉及急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的三项大型随机对照试验中使用的潮气量进行的个体患者数据分析。

Individual patient data analysis of tidal volumes used in three large randomized control trials involving patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

Northern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, Queen's University of Belfast, UK.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2017 Apr 1;118(4):570-575. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew465.

DOI:10.1093/bja/aew465
PMID:28403395
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8542892/
Abstract

BACKGROUND.: The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a condition with a high mortality and morbidity. Mechanical ventilation prevents immediate mortality but may further damage patients' lungs. Low tidal volume lung-protective strategies have been shown to increase survival by reducing this iatrogenic damage. Current guidelines recommend tidal volumes of 6-8 ml kg -1 of predicted body weight. We used data from three large randomized controlled trials of treatments for ARDS to determine compliance with these recommendations.

METHODS.: We used the tidal volume recorded at randomization for all patients in the OSCAR, HARP-2, and BALTI-2 studies. In addition, we used the ventilation data for control arm patients in OSCAR and all patients in HARP-2 at days 1 and 7 after randomization.

RESULTS.: The three trials enrolled 1660 patients, with tidal volume data available at least at one time point in 1412 patients. Compliance with the 6-8 ml kg -1 recommendation for tidal volume ranged from 20 to 39% of patients across all time points in all three trials.

CONCLUSION.: Poor compliance with the guidelines for tidal volume in patients with ARDS has been demonstrated before in case series, but not in clinical trials where the patient population is specifically selected against standard ARDS diagnostic criteria and the investigators were encouraged to use low tidal volumes. This study may indicate a need to improve implementation and compliance with protective lung ventilation.

摘要

背景

急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)是一种死亡率和发病率都很高的疾病。机械通气可以防止立即死亡,但可能会进一步损害患者的肺部。低潮气量肺保护策略已被证明可以通过减少这种医源性损伤来提高生存率。目前的指南建议潮气量为预测体重的 6-8ml/kg。我们使用了来自三个大型 ARDS 治疗随机对照试验的数据,以确定这些建议的依从性。

方法

我们使用了 OSCAR、HARP-2 和 BALTI-2 研究中所有随机分组患者的记录潮气量。此外,我们还使用了 OSCAR 对照组患者和 HARP-2 所有患者在随机分组后第 1 天和第 7 天的通气数据。

结果

这三项试验共纳入了 1660 名患者,其中至少有 1412 名患者在一个或多个时间点有潮气量数据。在所有三项试验中,所有时间点的患者中,符合潮气量 6-8ml/kg 建议的比例为 20-39%。

结论

在病例系列中已经证明 ARDS 患者对潮气量指南的依从性很差,但在专门选择排除标准 ARDS 诊断标准的患者人群的临床试验中并未如此。本研究可能表明需要改进保护性肺通气的实施和依从性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39fa/8542892/9f0513bdf253/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39fa/8542892/dde368c148df/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39fa/8542892/9f0513bdf253/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39fa/8542892/dde368c148df/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39fa/8542892/9f0513bdf253/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Individual patient data analysis of tidal volumes used in three large randomized control trials involving patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.对涉及急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的三项大型随机对照试验中使用的潮气量进行的个体患者数据分析。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Apr 1;118(4):570-575. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew465.
2
[Analysis of compliance with lung protective mechanical ventilation strategy in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome].[急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者肺保护性机械通气策略的依从性分析]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 May 12;47(5):419-429. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20230808-00054.
3
Poor Adherence to Lung-Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征中对肺保护性机械通气的依从性差
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct;17(10):917-923. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000903.
4
The effects of low tidal ventilation on lung strain correlate with respiratory system compliance.低潮气量通气对肺应变的影响与呼吸系统顺应性相关。
Crit Care. 2017 Feb 3;21(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1600-x.
5
Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome.与传统潮气量相比,采用较低潮气量对急性肺损伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征进行通气治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801.
6
Lower tidal volume at initiation of mechanical ventilation may reduce progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review.机械通气开始时采用较低潮气量可能会降低急性呼吸窘迫综合征的进展:一项系统评价。
Crit Care. 2013 Jan 18;17(1):R11. doi: 10.1186/cc11936.
7
Driving Pressure-limited Strategy for Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.驱动压力限制策略治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者:一项初步随机临床试验。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 May;17(5):596-604. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201907-506OC.
8
Ventilation with lower tidal volumes versus traditional tidal volumes in adults for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome.成人急性肺损伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征中低潮气量通气与传统潮气量通气的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD003844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003844.pub2.
9
Low Tidal Volume versus Non-Volume-Limited Strategies for Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.低潮气量与非容量限制策略治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Oct;14(Supplement_4):S271-S279. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201704-337OT.
10
Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis.肺保护性通气策略与小潮气量对未发生急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者临床结局影响的 Meta 分析
JAMA. 2012 Oct 24;308(16):1651-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.13730.

引用本文的文献

1
ARDS Subphenotypes as a Guide to Therapy and Enrollment into Therapeutic Trials: Not So Fast.急性呼吸窘迫综合征亚型作为治疗指南及纳入治疗试验的依据:别急着下结论。
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 28;14(17):6088. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176088.
2
Low Tidal Volume Ventilation Is Poorly Implemented for Patients in North American and United Kingdom ICUs Using Electronic Health Records.北美和英国 ICU 患者使用电子病历时,低潮气量通气的实施情况较差。
Chest. 2024 Feb;165(2):333-347. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.09.021. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
3
Unsuccessful and Successful Clinical Trials in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Addressing Physiology-Based Gaps.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries.全球 50 个国家重症监护病房急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的流行病学、治疗模式和死亡率。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291.
2
Current incidence and outcome of the acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征的当前发病率及预后
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2016 Feb;22(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000266.
3
Do we practise low tidal-volume ventilation in the intensive care unit? a 14-year audit.
急性呼吸窘迫综合征中失败与成功的临床试验:填补基于生理学的差距
Front Physiol. 2021 Nov 30;12:774025. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.774025. eCollection 2021.
4
Protective mechanical ventilation with optimal PEEP during RARP improves oxygenation and pulmonary indexes.保护性机械通气联合最佳呼气末正压通气在肾部分切除术中改善氧合和肺功能指标。
Trials. 2021 May 19;22(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05310-9.
5
Dexamethasone and transdehydroandrosterone significantly reduce pulmonary epithelial cell injuries associated with mechanical ventilation.地塞米松和去氢表雄酮可显著减轻机械通气相关的肺上皮细胞损伤。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2021 Apr 1;130(4):1143-1151. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00574.2020. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
6
Fluid intake-related association between urine output and mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome.液体摄入与急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者尿量和死亡率的相关性。
Respir Res. 2020 Jan 14;21(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-1286-5.
7
Alveolar dynamics during mechanical ventilation in the healthy and injured lung.健康肺和损伤肺在机械通气过程中的肺泡动力学。
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2019 Jul 25;7(Suppl 1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40635-019-0226-5.
8
A Comparison of the Effects of Lung Protective Ventilation and Conventional Ventilation on Thermoregulation During Anaesthesia.肺保护性通气与传统通气对麻醉期间体温调节影响的比较
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2019 Jun;47(3):173-178. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2018.73659. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
我们在重症监护病房实施低潮气量通气吗?一项为期14年的审计。
Crit Care Resusc. 2015 Jun;17(2):108-12.
4
A complete audit cycle to assess adherence to a lung protective ventilation strategy.一个完整的审计周期,以评估对肺保护性通气策略的依从性。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014 Nov;18(11):746-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.144020.
5
Simvastatin in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.辛伐他汀治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 30;371(18):1695-703. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1403285. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
6
A multicenter population-based effectiveness study of teleintensive care unit-directed ventilator rounds demonstrating improved adherence to a protective lung strategy, decreased ventilator duration, and decreased intensive care unit mortality.一项基于多中心人群的远程重症监护病房指导通气查房有效性研究表明,对肺保护策略的依从性提高、通气时间缩短且重症监护病房死亡率降低。
J Crit Care. 2014 Aug;29(4):691.e7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.02.017. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
7
Factors associated with adherence to low-tidal volume strategy for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome and their impacts on outcomes: an observational study and propensity analysis.与急性肺损伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征低潮气量策略依从性相关的因素及其对预后的影响:一项观察性研究和倾向分析
Minerva Anestesiol. 2014 Nov;80(11):1158-68. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
8
Better ventilator settings using a computerized clinical tool.使用计算机化临床工具实现更好的呼吸机设置。
Respir Care. 2014 Aug;59(8):1172-7. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02223.
9
High-frequency oscillation in early acute respiratory distress syndrome.早期急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的高频振荡。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 28;368(9):795-805. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1215554. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
10
High-frequency oscillation for acute respiratory distress syndrome.高频振荡治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 28;368(9):806-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1215716. Epub 2013 Jan 22.