Suppr超能文献

错失的机会:澳大利亚全科医生和产科医生为孕妇提供戒烟护理的横断面调查

Opportunities Missed: A Cross-Sectional Survey of the Provision of Smoking Cessation Care to Pregnant Women by Australian General Practitioners and Obstetricians.

作者信息

Zeev Yael Bar, Bonevski Billie, Twyman Laura, Watt Kerrianne, Atkins Lou, Palazzi Kerrin, Oldmeadow Christopher, Gould Gillian S

机构信息

School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.

James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 May 1;19(5):636-641. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw331.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Similar to other high-income countries, smoking rates in pregnancy can be high in specific vulnerable groups in Australia. Several clinical guidelines exist, including the 5A's (Ask, Advice, Assess, Assist, and Arrange), ABCD (Ask, Brief advice, Cessation, and Discuss), and AAR (Ask, Advice, and Refer). There is lack of data on provision of smoking cessation care (SCC) of Australian General Practitioners (GPs) and Obstetricians.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey explored the provision of SCC, barriers and enablers using the Theoretical Domains Framework, and the associations between them. Two samples were invited: (1) GPs and Obstetricians from a college database (n = 5571); (2) GPs from a special interest group for Indigenous health (n = 500). Dimension reduction for the Theoretical Domains Framework was achieved with factor analysis. Logistic regression was carried out for performing all the 5A's and the AAR.

RESULTS

Performing all of the 5A's, ABCD, and AAR "often and always" was reported by 19.9%, 15.6%, and 49.2% respectively. "Internal influences" (such as confidence in counselling) were associated with higher performance of the 5A's (Adjusted OR 2.69 (95% CI 1.5, 4.8), p < .001), whereas "External influences" (such as workplace routine) were associated with higher performance of AAR (Adjusted OR 1.7 (95% CI 1, 2.8), p = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

Performance in providing SCC to pregnant women is low among Australian GPs and Obstetricians. Training clinicians should focus on improving internal influences such as confidence and optimism. The AAR may be easier to implement, and interventions at the service level should focus on ensuring easy, effective, and acceptable referral mechanisms are in place.

IMPLICATIONS

Improving provision of the 5A's approach should focus on the individual level, including better training for GPs and Obstetricians, designed to improve specific "internal" barriers such as confidence in counselling and optimism. The AAR may be easier to implement in view of the higher overall performance of this approach. Interventions on a more systemic level need to ensure easy, effective, and acceptable referral mechanisms are in place. More research is needed specifically on the acceptability of the Quitline for pregnant women, both Indigenous and non-Indigenous.

摘要

引言

与其他高收入国家类似,澳大利亚特定弱势群体的孕期吸烟率可能很高。现有多项临床指南,包括“5A法”(询问、建议、评估、协助和安排)、ABCD法(询问、简短建议、戒烟和讨论)以及AAR法(询问、建议和转诊)。目前缺乏关于澳大利亚全科医生(GP)和产科医生提供戒烟护理(SCC)的数据。

方法

一项横断面调查采用理论域框架探讨了SCC的提供情况、障碍和促进因素以及它们之间的关联。邀请了两个样本:(1)来自一个学会数据库的全科医生和产科医生(n = 5571);(2)来自一个土著健康特殊兴趣小组的全科医生(n = 500)。通过因子分析实现了理论域框架的降维。对执行所有5A法和AAR法进行了逻辑回归分析。

结果

分别有19.9%、15.6%和49.2%的受访者报告“经常且总是”执行所有5A法、ABCD法和AAR法。“内部影响因素”(如咨询的信心)与更高的5A法执行情况相关(调整后比值比2.69(95%置信区间1.5,4.8),p <.001),而“外部影响因素”(如工作流程)与更高的AAR法执行情况相关(调整后比值比1.7(95%置信区间1,2.8),p =.035)。

结论

澳大利亚全科医生和产科医生为孕妇提供SCC的表现较低。培训临床医生应专注于改善诸如信心和乐观等内部影响因素。AAR法可能更易于实施,服务层面的干预应专注于确保建立简便、有效且可接受的转诊机制。

启示

改善5A法的提供应聚焦于个体层面,包括为全科医生和产科医生提供更好的培训,旨在改善特定的“内部”障碍,如咨询的信心和乐观态度。鉴于该方法的总体执行情况更高,AAR法可能更易于实施。更系统层面的干预需要确保建立简便、有效且可接受的转诊机制。尤其需要更多关于孕妇(包括土著和非土著孕妇)对戒烟热线可接受性的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验