Institute of Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Risk Anal. 2018 Jan;38(1):99-117. doi: 10.1111/risa.12810. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
Risk matrices have been widely used as a risk evaluation tool in many fields due to their simplicity and intuitive nature. Designing a rating scheme, i.e., determining the number of ratings used in a risk matrix and assigning different ratings to different cells, is an essential part of risk matrix construction. However, most of the related literature has focused on applying a risk matrix to various fields, instead of researching how to design risk matrices. Based on the analysis of several current rules, we propose a new approach, namely, the sequential updating approach (SUA), to design the rating scheme of a risk matrix in a reliable way. In this article, we propose three principles and a rating algorithm based on these principles. The three principles, namely, adjusted weak consistency, consistent internality, and continuous screening, characterize a good rating scheme. The resulting rating scheme has been proven to be unique. A global rating algorithm is then proposed to create the design that satisfies the three principles. We then explore the performance of the SUA. An illustrative application is first given to explain the feasibility of our approach. The sensitivity analysis shows that our method captures a resolution-reliability tradeoff for decisionmakers in choosing an appropriate rating scheme for a risk matrix. Finally, we compare the designs based on the SUA and Cox's axioms, highlighting the advantages of the SUA.
风险矩阵由于其简单直观的性质,已被广泛应用于许多领域作为风险评估工具。设计评分方案,即确定风险矩阵中使用的评分数量,并为不同的单元格分配不同的评分,是风险矩阵构建的重要组成部分。然而,大多数相关文献都侧重于将风险矩阵应用于各个领域,而不是研究如何设计风险矩阵。基于对几种现有规则的分析,我们提出了一种新的方法,即顺序更新方法(SUA),以可靠地设计风险矩阵的评分方案。在本文中,我们提出了三个原则和一个基于这些原则的评分算法。三个原则分别是调整后的弱一致性、一致的内部性和连续筛选,它们可以很好地描述一个评分方案。所得到的评分方案被证明是唯一的。然后提出了一个全局评分算法来创建满足三个原则的设计。然后我们探讨了 SUA 的性能。首先给出了一个说明性的应用案例,以解释我们的方法的可行性。敏感性分析表明,我们的方法为决策者在为风险矩阵选择合适的评分方案时,提供了一个分辨率-可靠性的权衡。最后,我们将基于 SUA 和 Cox 公理的设计进行比较,突出了 SUA 的优势。