• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体化沟通技能培训对肿瘤内科医生临床试验讨论的影响:一项随机对照试验的结果

Effect of individualized communication skills training on physicians' discussion of clinical trials in oncology: results from a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Wuensch Alexander, Goelz Tanja, Ihorst Gabriele, Terris Darcey D, Bertz Hartmut, Bengel Juergen, Wirsching Michael, Fritzsche Kurt

机构信息

Center for Mental Health, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Hauptstr. 8, D-79104, Freiburg, Germany.

Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Langerstrasse 3, D-81675, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2017 Apr 13;17(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3238-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-017-3238-0
PMID:28403837
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5390387/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Discussing randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with cancer patients is one of the most challenging communication tasks a physician faces. Only two prior Communication Skills Trainings (CSTs) focused on RCTs in oncology have been reported. Their results demonstrated the need for further improvement. We developed and evaluated an enhanced, individually-tailored CST focused on improving physicians' communication during discussions of RCTs.

METHODS

The CST focused on personal learning goals derived from video pre-assessment that were addressed in a 1.5-day group workshop and one-on-one coaching sessions. Forty physicians were recruited and randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. Video-recorded standardized consultations with actor-patients were utilized. As a primary outcome (1), training success was evaluated by blinded raters using a previously developed checklist. Change in checklist items was evaluated between pre- and post-training assessment and compared against control group results. As a secondary outcome (2), the physicians' feeling of confidence was assessed by a questionnaire.

RESULTS

(1) Significant improvements in the intervention group were observed for the score on all items (p = 0.03), for the subgroup of content-specific items (p = 0.02), and for the global rating of communication competence (p = 0.04). The improvement observed for the subgroup of general communication skill items did not achieve significance (p = 0.20). (2) The feeling of confidence improved in nine out of ten domains.

CONCLUSION

While the individually-tailored CST program significantly improved the physicians' discussions of RCTs, specifically related to discussion content, what remains unknown is the influence of such programs in practice on participant recruitment rates. The study was registered retrospectively in 2010/07/22 under DRKS-ID: DRKS00000492 .

摘要

背景

与癌症患者讨论随机临床试验(RCT)是医生面临的最具挑战性的沟通任务之一。此前仅有两项针对肿瘤学RCT的沟通技能培训(CST)被报道。其结果表明仍需进一步改进。我们开发并评估了一种强化的、个性化的CST,旨在改善医生在讨论RCT时的沟通。

方法

CST聚焦于从视频预评估中得出的个人学习目标,这些目标在为期1.5天的小组研讨会和一对一辅导课程中得到解决。招募了40名医生并随机分配到干预组和对照组。使用与演员患者进行的视频录制标准化咨询。作为主要结果(1),由盲法评分者使用先前制定的检查表评估培训成功率。在培训前和培训后评估之间评估检查表项目的变化,并与对照组结果进行比较。作为次要结果(2),通过问卷调查评估医生的自信心。

结果

(1)干预组在所有项目的得分(p = 0.03)、特定内容项目子组(p = 0.02)以及沟通能力总体评分(p = 0.04)方面均有显著改善。一般沟通技能项目子组的改善未达到显著水平(p = 0.20)。(2)十个领域中有九个领域的自信心有所提高。

结论

虽然个性化的CST计划显著改善了医生对RCT的讨论,特别是与讨论内容相关的方面,但此类计划在实践中对参与者招募率的影响尚不清楚。该研究于2010年7月22日进行回顾性注册,注册号为DRKS-ID:DRKS00000492。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae64/5390387/3b3c9616cb07/12885_2017_3238_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae64/5390387/3b3c9616cb07/12885_2017_3238_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae64/5390387/3b3c9616cb07/12885_2017_3238_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of individualized communication skills training on physicians' discussion of clinical trials in oncology: results from a randomized controlled trial.个体化沟通技能培训对肿瘤内科医生临床试验讨论的影响:一项随机对照试验的结果
BMC Cancer. 2017 Apr 13;17(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3238-0.
2
Specific training program improves oncologists' palliative care communication skills in a randomized controlled trial.一项随机对照试验表明,特定的培训计划可提高肿瘤学家的姑息治疗沟通技巧。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Sep 1;29(25):3402-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.6372. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
3
Addressing the transition from curative to palliative care: concept and acceptance of a specific communication skills training for physicians in oncology--COM-ON-p.应对从治愈性治疗到姑息治疗的转变:肿瘤学医生特定沟通技能培训的概念与接受度——COM-ON-p
Onkologie. 2010;33(1-2):65-9. doi: 10.1159/000264626. Epub 2010 Jan 22.
4
Factors that influence physicians' detection of distress in patients with cancer: can a communication skills training program improve physicians' detection?影响医生对癌症患者痛苦察觉的因素:沟通技能培训项目能否提高医生的察觉能力?
Cancer. 2005 Jul 15;104(2):411-21. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21172.
5
ComOn Coaching: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of a varied number of coaching sessions on transfer into clinical practice following communication skills training.ComOn辅导:一项随机对照试验的研究方案,旨在评估不同辅导课程数量对沟通技能培训后向临床实践转化的影响。
BMC Cancer. 2015 Jul 7;15:503. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1454-z.
6
Oncology clinicians' defenses and adherence to communication skills training with simulated patients: an exploratory study.肿瘤临床医生对模拟患者沟通技巧培训的抵触与依从性:一项探索性研究。
J Cancer Educ. 2012 Jun;27(3):399-403. doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0366-8.
7
ComOn-Coaching: The effect of a varied number of coaching sessions on transfer into clinical practice following communication skills training in oncology: Results of a randomized controlled trial.ComOn-Coaching:在肿瘤学沟通技巧培训后,不同数量的辅导课程对转移到临床实践的影响:一项随机对照试验的结果。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 5;13(10):e0205315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205315. eCollection 2018.
8
Physicians' communication with a cancer patient and a relative: a randomized study assessing the efficacy of consolidation workshops.医生与癌症患者及其亲属的沟通:一项评估强化研讨会效果的随机研究。
Cancer. 2005 Jun 1;103(11):2397-411. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21093.
9
How to optimize physicians' communication skills in cancer care: results of a randomized study assessing the usefulness of posttraining consolidation workshops.如何在癌症护理中优化医生的沟通技巧:一项评估培训后巩固研讨会效用的随机研究结果
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Aug 15;21(16):3141-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.08.031.
10
Communication about uncertainty and hope: A randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of a communication skills training program for physicians caring for cancer patients.关于不确定性与希望的沟通:一项随机对照试验,评估针对癌症患者护理医生的沟通技能培训项目的效果。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Jul 10;17(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3437-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Educating Hematology-Oncology Fellows About How to Communicate with Patients About Clinical Trials: A Needs Assessment.关于如何与患者就临床试验进行沟通对血液学-肿瘤学研究员进行培训:需求评估。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 Aug 5;11:23821205241269376. doi: 10.1177/23821205241269376. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Optimising recruitment in clinical trials for progressive multiple sclerosis: observational analysis from the MS-SMART and MS-STAT2 randomised controlled trials.优化进展性多发性硬化症临床试验的招募:来自 MS-SMART 和 MS-STAT2 随机对照试验的观察性分析。
Trials. 2022 Aug 9;23(1):644. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06588-z.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer.为与癌症患者打交道的医护人员提供沟通技巧培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD003751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003751.pub3.
2
Specific training program improves oncologists' palliative care communication skills in a randomized controlled trial.一项随机对照试验表明,特定的培训计划可提高肿瘤学家的姑息治疗沟通技巧。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Sep 1;29(25):3402-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.6372. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
3
Development and evaluation of a checklist assessing communication skills of oncologists: the COM-ON-Checklist.
Trial-level factors affecting accrual and completion of oncology clinical trials: A systematic review.
影响肿瘤学临床试验入组和完成的试验层面因素:一项系统综述
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Oct 21;24:100843. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100843. eCollection 2021 Dec.
4
Increasing advance care planning in the secondary care setting: A quality improvement project.在二级医疗环境中加强预先护理计划:一项质量改进项目。
Future Healthc J. 2020 Jun;7(2):137-142. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2019-0040.
5
Communication interventions in adult and pediatric oncology: A scoping review and analysis of behavioral targets.成人和儿科肿瘤学中的沟通干预措施:行为目标的范围综述和分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 22;14(8):e0221536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221536. eCollection 2019.
6
ComOn-Coaching: The effect of a varied number of coaching sessions on transfer into clinical practice following communication skills training in oncology: Results of a randomized controlled trial.ComOn-Coaching:在肿瘤学沟通技巧培训后,不同数量的辅导课程对转移到临床实践的影响:一项随机对照试验的结果。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 5;13(10):e0205315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205315. eCollection 2018.
7
Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer.针对与癌症患者打交道的医疗保健专业人员的沟通技能培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 24;7(7):CD003751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003751.pub4.
8
Social and structural conditions for the avoidance of advance care planning in neuro-oncology: a qualitative study.神经肿瘤学中避免预先护理计划的社会和结构条件:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 31;8(1):e019057. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019057.
9
How to assess communication skills? Development of the rating scale ComOn Check.如何评估沟通技巧?ComOn Check 评分量表的制定。
Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1392823. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2017.1392823.
10
Assessing Communication Skills in Real Medical Encounters in Oncology: Development and Validation of the ComOn-Coaching Rating Scales.评估肿瘤学实际医疗问诊中的沟通技巧:ComOn-Coaching评分量表的开发与验证
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Feb;34(1):73-81. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1269-5.
评估肿瘤学家沟通技巧的检查表的制定与评估:COM-ON-Checklist。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Apr;18(2):225-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01556.x. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
4
Disclosing information about randomised controlled trials in oncology: training concept and evaluation of an individualised communication skills training for physicians COM-ON-rct.披露肿瘤学随机对照试验信息:针对医师的 COM-ON-rct 个体化沟通技巧培训的培训概念和评估。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2011 Sep;20(5):570-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2010.01233.x. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
5
Efficacy of communication skills training courses in oncology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肿瘤学沟通技巧培训课程的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Oncol. 2011 May;22(5):1030-1040. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq441. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
6
Is it possible to improve residents breaking bad news skills? A randomised study assessing the efficacy of a communication skills training program.是否有可能提高住院医师告知坏消息的技巧?一项评估沟通技巧培训计划效果的随机研究。
Br J Cancer. 2010 Jul 13;103(2):171-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605749.
7
Identification of accrual barriers onto breast cancer prevention clinical trials: a case-control study.识别乳腺癌预防临床试验中的累积障碍:一项病例对照研究。
Cancer. 2010 Aug 1;116(15):3569-76. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25230.
8
The effect of communication skills training on patient outcomes in cancer care: a systematic review of the literature.沟通技巧培训对癌症护理中患者结局的影响:文献系统评价。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2010 Jul;19(4):442-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01082.x. Epub 2009 Dec 17.
9
Communication skills training in oncology: a position paper based on a consensus meeting among European experts in 2009.肿瘤学中的沟通技巧培训:基于 2009 年欧洲专家共识会议的一份立场文件。
Ann Oncol. 2010 Feb;21(2):204-207. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp564. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
10
Influence of clinical communication on patients' decision making on participation in clinical trials.临床沟通对患者参与临床试验决策的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jun 1;26(16):2666-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8114.