Patabendige M, Jayawardane A
University Obstetrics Unit, De Soysa Hospital for Women, Colombo-08, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Kinsey Road, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Apr 12;10(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2478-z.
Intracervical insertion of a Foley catheter (FC) has shown to be a safe, effective and relatively feasible mechanical method of cervical priming in induction of labour (IOL). We evaluated indications, effectiveness, patient acceptability and outcomes of FC use in IOL adhering to the ward protocol in our unit.
A clinical audit with a patient satisfaction survey conducted between July and September 2013 in University Obstetric Unit, Colombo, Sri Lanka. Patients selected for IOL for obstetric reasons were primed with Foley as per ward protocol. All had singleton pregnancies with cephalic presentation, intact membranes and period of gestation of 37 weeks or above. Women with a history of more than one caesarean section or uterine surgery, low-lying placenta and fetal growth restriction were excluded. Subjects who had a Modified Bishop Score (MBS) of less than 3, a 16Fr FC was inserted into cervical canal. Catheter was left undisturbed until spontaneous expulsion or no longer than 48 h. In women with MBS of less than 6 at 48 h after FC insertion, 3 mg prostaglandin E2 vaginal tablet was used subsequently. Artificial membrane rupture with or without oxytocin was used if MBS of 6 or more and in women not in labour 24 h after prostaglandins. Patient satisfaction for Foley insertion was assessed with regards to the degree of comfort using a validated visual analogue scale (0-10).
There were a total of 910 deliveries during the study period. Fifty-six women were primed with FC. Thirty-two (57%) were nulliparous. During induction of labour, 53(95%) reported mild or no discomfort. MBS of 6 or more was achieved in 36/56 (64%) Foley insertions. Twenty needed further intervention with prostaglandins. FC only group had 5 caesarean sections and 31 vaginal deliveries and Foley/prostaglandin group had 7 caesarean sections and 13 vaginal deliveries. Of the 24 women who were induced due to completion of 41 weeks of gestation with otherwise uncomplicated pregnancies, 17 had MBS >6 post priming with Foley and 20 (83%) delivered vaginally. Subjects who had Foley only had a lesser chance of having a caesarean delivery compared to subjects who had Foley followed by prostaglandin (relative risk = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.15-1.09, P = 0.09).
FC is a good choice for pre-induction cervical priming with high patient comfort. FC becomes more important in IOL cost reduction in our setting. FC alone seems to be an effective for IOL in women who have completed 41 weeks of gestation with otherwise uncomplicated pregnancies.
宫颈内插入福乐导尿管(FC)已被证明是引产(IOL)中一种安全、有效且相对可行的宫颈预处理机械方法。我们按照本单位的病房方案,评估了FC在IOL中的适应证、有效性、患者可接受性及结局。
2013年7月至9月在斯里兰卡科伦坡大学产科病房进行了一项临床审计及患者满意度调查。因产科原因选择IOL的患者按照病房方案用福乐导尿管进行预处理。所有患者均为单胎妊娠、头先露、胎膜完整且孕周为37周或以上。有多次剖宫产或子宫手术史、前置胎盘及胎儿生长受限的女性被排除。改良Bishop评分(MBS)小于3分的受试者,将16Fr的FC插入宫颈管。导管留置不动,直至自然排出或不超过48小时。FC插入后48小时MBS小于6分的女性,随后使用3mg前列腺素E2阴道片。MBS为6分或以上以及使用前列腺素后24小时仍未分娩的女性,采用人工破膜加或不加缩宫素。使用经过验证的视觉模拟量表(0 - 10)评估患者对福乐导尿管插入的舒适度满意度。
研究期间共有910例分娩。56名女性用FC进行了预处理。32名(57%)为初产妇。引产期间,53名(95%)报告有轻度不适或无不适。56次FC插入中有36次(64%)达到MBS为6分或以上。20名需要进一步使用前列腺素干预。仅FC组有5例剖宫产和31例阴道分娩,FC/前列腺素组有7例剖宫产和13例阴道分娩。在因妊娠41周结束且其他方面无并发症而引产的24名女性中,17名在福乐导尿管预处理后MBS>6分,20名(83%)经阴道分娩。仅使用FC的受试者与先使用FC后使用前列腺素的受试者相比,剖宫产的几率较小(相对风险 = 0.40,95%可信区间 = 0.15 - 1.09,P = 0.09)。
FC是引产术前宫颈预处理的一个好选择,患者舒适度高。在我们的环境中,FC在降低IOL成本方面变得更为重要。对于妊娠41周结束且其他方面无并发症的女性,仅FC似乎对IOL有效。