Hamouda S, Mancini J, Marchand F, Bretelle F, Boubli L, D'Ercole C, Carcopino X
Department of obstetrics and gynaecology, hôpital Nord, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille (AP-HM), chemin des Bourrely, 13015 Marseille, France.
Department of public health, hôpital de la Timone, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille (AP-HM), 13015 Marseille, France; Aix-Marseille université (AMU), Marseille, France.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017 Jan;46(1):43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
To evaluate the risk of severe perineal tear following instrumental vaginal delivery (IVD) performed with spatulas and vacuum extraction. Secondary objectives were to estimate the impact of episiotomy on this risk.
From December 2008 to October 2012, women who underwent spatulas or vacuum were prospectively included. Each spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) following each included IVD were included as control cases (1-1 ratio). Careful perineal examination was systematically performed. Severe perineal tear was defined by the occurrence of anal sphincter rupture with or without anal mucosa tear.
A total of 761 patients were included in the current study: 248 (64%) spatulas, 137 (36%) vacuums and 381 (49%) SVDs. Severe perineal tear was diagnosed in 19 (2.5%) cases. Episiotomy had been performed in 276 (36.9%) patients. Only spatulas extraction was found to significantly increase the risk of severe perineal tear (AOR=7.66; 95% CI: 2.06-28; P=0.02). Although vacuum extraction seemed to increase this risk, it was not found to be significant (AOR=3.25; 95% CI: 0.65-16.24; P=0.15). No significant difference was observed between the risk of severe perineal tear following spatulas and vacuum (AOR=2.36; 95% CI: 0.63-8.82; P=0.202). Finally, neither foetal macrosomia, nor episiotomy, nor foetal extraction with the head in the deep pelvis, nor delivery at night had a significant impact on the probability of severe perineal tear.
Spatulas extraction is an independent risk factor for severe perineal tear. The practice of episiotomy was not shown to have any significant impact on this risk.
评估使用产钳和真空吸引器进行器械阴道分娩(IVD)后发生严重会阴撕裂的风险。次要目的是评估会阴切开术对该风险的影响。
2008年12月至2012年10月,前瞻性纳入接受产钳或真空吸引器助产的女性。每次纳入的IVD后的每例自然阴道分娩(SVD)作为对照病例(1:1比例)。系统地进行仔细的会阴检查。严重会阴撕裂定义为发生肛门括约肌破裂,伴或不伴有肛管黏膜撕裂。
本研究共纳入761例患者:248例(64%)使用产钳,137例(36%)使用真空吸引器,381例(49%)为SVD。19例(2.5%)诊断为严重会阴撕裂。276例(36.9%)患者行会阴切开术。仅发现产钳助产显著增加严重会阴撕裂风险(比值比[AOR]=7.66;95%置信区间[CI]:2.06 - 28;P = 0.02)。尽管真空吸引助产似乎增加了该风险,但未发现具有统计学意义(AOR = 3.25;95% CI:0.65 - 16.24;P = 0.15)。产钳助产和真空吸引助产术后严重会阴撕裂风险之间未观察到显著差异(AOR = 2.36;95% CI:0.63 - 8.82;P = 0.202)。最后,胎儿巨大、会阴切开术、胎头深嵌骨盆时助产及夜间分娩均对严重会阴撕裂的可能性无显著影响。
产钳助产是严重会阴撕裂的独立危险因素。未显示会阴切开术对该风险有任何显著影响。