Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
UOC Gastroenterologia ed Epatologia, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jan;2(1):52-62. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30080-2. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
The Asia-Pacific region has disparate hepatitis C virus (HCV) epidemiology, with prevalence ranging from 0·1% to 4·7%, and a unique genotype distribution. Genotype 1b dominates in east Asia, whereas in south Asia and southeast Asia genotype 3 dominates, and in Indochina (Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos), genotype 6 is most common. Often, availability of all-oral direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) is delayed because of differing regulatory requirements. Ideally, for genotype 1 infections, sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir, sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir, or ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir plus dasabuvir are suitable. Asunaprevir plus daclatasvir is appropriate for compensated genotype 1b HCV if baseline NS5A mutations are absent. For genotype 3 infections, sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir for 24 weeks or sofosbuvir, daclatasvir, and ribavirin for 12 weeks are the optimal oral therapies, particularly for patients with cirrhosis and those who are treatment experienced, whereas sofosbuvir, pegylated interferon, and ribavirin for 12 weeks is an alternative regimen. For genotype 6, sofosbuvir plus pegylated interferon and ribavirin, sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir, or sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 12 weeks are all suitable. Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin has been replaced by sofosbuvir plus pegylated interferon and ribavirin, and all-oral therapies where available, but cost and affordability remain a major issue because of the absence of universal health coverage. Few patients have been treated because of multiple barriers to accessing care. HCV in the Asia-Pacific region is challenging because of the disparate epidemiology, poor access to all-oral therapy because of availability, cost, or regulatory licensing. Until these problems are addressed, the burden of disease is likely to remain high.
亚太地区的丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)流行病学存在差异,流行率范围为 0.1%至 4.7%,基因型分布也具有独特性。基因型 1b 在东亚占主导地位,而在南亚和东南亚,基因型 3 占主导地位,在印度支那(越南、柬埔寨和老挝),基因型 6 最为常见。由于监管要求不同,通常所有口服直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)的供应都会延迟。对于基因型 1 感染,理想情况下,索非布韦联合 ledipasvir、索非布韦联合达卡他韦或奥比他韦、帕立瑞韦和利托那韦联合达沙布韦是合适的选择。对于无基线 NS5A 突变的代偿性基因型 1b HCV,使用asunaprevir 联合达卡他韦也是合适的。对于基因型 3 感染,24 周的索非布韦联合达卡他韦或 12 周的索非布韦、达卡他韦和利巴韦林是最佳的口服治疗方案,特别是对于肝硬化患者和治疗经验丰富的患者,而 12 周的索非布韦、聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林是另一种替代方案。对于基因型 6,索非布韦联合聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林、索非布韦联合 ledipasvir 或索非布韦联合利巴韦林 12 周都是合适的选择。由于缺乏全民健康覆盖,聚乙二醇干扰素联合利巴韦林已被索非布韦联合聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林以及所有可用的口服治疗方案所取代,但成本和可负担性仍然是一个主要问题。由于多种获取治疗的障碍,很少有患者得到治疗。由于流行病学的差异、口服治疗的可及性、成本和监管许可等因素,亚太地区的 HCV 治疗具有挑战性。在这些问题得到解决之前,疾病负担可能仍然很高。