Department of Urology, Urological Research Centre, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kabbeltoft 25, 7100, Vejle, Denmark.
Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
World J Urol. 2017 Oct;35(10):1489-1496. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2035-3. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
To correlate ureteral lesions visualized during ureteroscopy with histopathological findings.
Ureteral access sheaths (UAS) sized 13/15 Fr. were inserted bilaterally in 22 laboratory pigs. During retraction of the UAS with a semirigid ureteroscope inside, ureteral lesions were evaluated and registered using the Post-ureteroscopic lesion scale (PULS). Ureters were excised in vivo between the uretero-pelvic junction and the uretero-vesical junction. Embedded in paraffin, 4-µm thick sections were step sectioned at 250-300 µm intervals and haematoxylin and eosin (HE) stained. Histopathological scoring of ureteral wall lesions was subsequently performed according to PULS.
In 72.1% of ureters, the highest histopathological score was at least 1 grade higher than the highest endoscopic PULS score. For 12 (27.9%) lesions, the difference was 2 scores higher, and for 1 (2.3%), it was 3 scores higher. The histopathological PULS grade was higher than the endoscopical PULS grade at all minimum, quartile, and maximum scores. There was a significant difference in the distribution of highest lesional scores between the endoscopic and histopathological PULS (p = 0.002). The calculated mean of the highest scores was 1.49 for endoscopic PULS and 2.51 for histopathological PULS (p < 0.0001).
Histopathological evaluation of ureteral wall lesions after UAS placement revealed a significantly higher degree of severity than observed endoscopically. Thus, endoscopy underestimated the histopathological extent of the lesion in the majority of cases.
将输尿管镜检查时观察到的输尿管损伤与组织病理学发现相关联。
在 22 只实验猪中双侧插入 13/15 Fr 的输尿管导入鞘(UAS)。在半刚性输尿管镜内部收回 UAS 时,评估并使用输尿管镜后损伤分级(PULS)记录输尿管损伤。在活体中从肾盂输尿管连接部到输尿管膀胱连接部之间切除输尿管。将 4-µm 厚的切片用石蜡包埋,每隔 250-300 µm 进行连续切片,并用苏木精和伊红(HE)染色。随后根据 PULS 对输尿管壁损伤进行组织病理学评分。
在 72.1%的输尿管中,最高组织病理学评分至少比最高内镜 PULS 评分高 1 级。对于 12 个(27.9%)病变,差异高 2 级,对于 1 个(2.3%)病变,差异高 3 级。在所有最低、四分位数和最大评分中,组织病理学 PULS 分级均高于内镜 PULS 分级。内镜和组织病理学 PULS 之间最高病变评分的分布存在显著差异(p = 0.002)。内镜 PULS 的最高评分平均值为 1.49,组织病理学 PULS 的最高评分平均值为 2.51(p < 0.0001)。
UAS 放置后输尿管壁损伤的组织病理学评估显示出明显更严重的程度,而内镜观察则低估了病变的组织病理学程度。因此,在大多数情况下,内镜检查低估了病变的组织病理学范围。