Alaish Ram, Lundgren David, Suhr Ole B, Werner Mårten, Karling Pontus
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jul;55(7):594-600. doi: 10.5414/CP202962.
To determine if 6-mercaptopurine (MP) is better tolerated than azathioprine (AZA) as the initial thiopurine treatment in patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Switching patients with IBD from AZA to MP is advocated in patients intolerant to AZA. However, no study has determined if MP is more suited than AZA as a first-line treatment for patients who are naïve to thiopurine treatment.
The tolerance of AZA and MP treatments in clinical practice was retrospectively evaluated from start to 12 months after initiating treatment in 113 patients with IBD who were all naïve to thiopurines (82 patients treated with AZA and 31 patients with MP).
65% of the patients treated with AZA and 61% of the patients treated with MP tolerated their treatment during 12 months (i.e., no group difference, p = 0.742). No difference in reported side effects between the two treatments was observed. The mean equivalent initial dose (0.92 vs. 0.61 mg/kg; p < 0.001) and the mean equivalent dose at 12 months (1.98 vs. 1.65 mg/kg; p = 0.014) was significantly higher in the MP group vs. the AZA group. The proportion of patients with ΔMCV ≥ 7 at 12 months was numerically higher in the MP group than in the AZA group (53% vs. 31%; p = 0.090).
CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective observational study, no differences in tolerance or adherence between AZA and MP were observed in patients naïve to thiopurines. However, MP treatment was at a higher equivalent thiopurine dose than AZA treatment, which tended to be associated with better treatment response. .
确定在患有炎症性肠病(IBD)的患者中,作为初始硫唑嘌呤治疗,6-巯基嘌呤(MP)是否比硫唑嘌呤(AZA)耐受性更好。对于不耐受AZA的IBD患者,提倡将其从AZA转换为MP。然而,尚无研究确定对于初次接受硫唑嘌呤治疗的患者,MP是否比AZA更适合作为一线治疗。
对113例初次接受硫唑嘌呤治疗的IBD患者(82例接受AZA治疗,31例接受MP治疗)从开始治疗到治疗后12个月的临床实践中AZA和MP治疗的耐受性进行了回顾性评估。
接受AZA治疗的患者中有65%以及接受MP治疗的患者中有61%在12个月内耐受了他们的治疗(即两组无差异,p = 0.742)。未观察到两种治疗之间报告的副作用有差异。MP组的平均等效初始剂量(0.92 vs. 0.61 mg/kg;p < 0.001)和12个月时的平均等效剂量(1.98 vs. 1.65 mg/kg;p = 0.014)显著高于AZA组。MP组12个月时ΔMCV≥7的患者比例在数值上高于AZA组(53% vs. 31%;p = 0.090)。
在这项回顾性观察研究中,初次接受硫唑嘌呤治疗的患者中,AZA和MP在耐受性或依从性方面未观察到差异。然而,MP治疗的等效硫唑嘌呤剂量高于AZA治疗,这倾向于与更好的治疗反应相关。