Ludema Christina, Cole Stephen R, Eron Joseph J, Holmes G Mark, Anastos Kathryn, Cocohoba Jennifer, Cohen Marge H, Cooper Hannah L F, Golub Elizabeth T, Kassaye Seble, Konkle-Parker Deborah, Metsch Lisa, Milam Joel, Wilson Tracey E, Adimora Adaora A
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Am J Hypertens. 2017 Jun 1;30(6):594-601. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpx015.
Health care access is an important determinant of health. We assessed the effect of health insurance status and type on blood pressure control among US women living with (WLWH) and without HIV.
We used longitudinal cohort data from the Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS). WIHS participants were included at their first study visit since 2001 with incident uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) (i.e., BP ≥140/90 and at which BP at the prior visit was controlled (i.e., <135/85). We assessed time to regained BP control using inverse Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models. Confounding and selection bias were accounted for using inverse probability-of-exposure-and-censoring weights.
Most of the 1,130 WLWH and 422 HIV-uninfected WIHS participants who had an elevated systolic or diastolic measurement were insured via Medicaid, were African-American, and had a yearly income ≤$12,000. Among participants living with HIV, comparing the uninsured to those with Medicaid yielded an 18-month BP control risk difference of 0.16 (95% CI: 0.10, 0.23). This translates into a number-needed-to-treat (or insure) of 6; to reduce the caseload of WLWH with uncontrolled BP by one case, five individuals without insurance would need to be insured via Medicaid. Blood pressure control was similar among WLWH with private insurance and Medicaid. There were no differences observed by health insurance status on 18-month risk of BP control among the HIV-uninfected participants.
These results underscore the importance of health insurance for hypertension control-especially for people living with HIV.
医疗保健可及性是健康的重要决定因素。我们评估了健康保险状况和类型对美国感染和未感染艾滋病毒的女性血压控制的影响。
我们使用了妇女机构间艾滋病毒研究(WIHS)的纵向队列数据。WIHS参与者自2001年首次研究访视时纳入,当时患有未控制的血压(BP)(即BP≥140/90,且前次访视时BP得到控制,即<135/85)。我们使用逆Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox比例风险模型评估恢复血压控制的时间。使用暴露和审查权重的逆概率来处理混杂和选择偏倚。
1130名感染艾滋病毒的女性和422名未感染艾滋病毒的WIHS参与者中,大多数收缩压或舒张压测量值升高的人通过医疗补助计划参保,是非裔美国人,年收入≤12,000美元。在感染艾滋病毒的参与者中,将未参保者与参加医疗补助计划者进行比较,血压控制风险差异为18个月时0.16(95%CI:0.10,0.2)。这转化为需治疗(或参保)人数为6;为了将未控制血压的感染艾滋病毒女性病例数减少一例,需要为五名未参保者通过医疗补助计划参保。感染艾滋病毒的女性中,参加私人保险和医疗补助计划者的血压控制情况相似。在未感染艾滋病毒的参与者中,按健康保险状况观察到的18个月血压控制风险无差异。
这些结果强调了健康保险对控制高血压的重要性——尤其是对艾滋病毒感染者而言。