Park Sehhoon, Kim Ji-Yeon, Lee Se-Hoon, Suh Beomseok, Keam Bhumsuk, Kim Tae Min, Kim Dong-Wan, Heo Dae Seog
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Family Medicine and Health Promotion Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Intern Med. 2017 May;32(3):514-522. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2015.299. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The predictive and prognostic value of KRAS mutation and its type of mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are controversial. This clinical study was designed to investigate the predictive value of KRAS mutations and its mutation types to pemetrexed and gemcitabine based treatment.
Advanced NSCLC patients tested for KRAS mutation (n = 334) were retrospectively reviewed and 252 patients with wild type epidermal growth factor receptor and no anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion were enrolled for the analysis. KRAS mutations were observed in 45 subjects with mutation type as followed: G12C (n = 13), G12D (n = 12), G12V (n = 12), other (n = 8). Response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of pemetrexed singlet and gemcitabine based chemotherapy were analysis.
Age, sex, performance status were well balanced between subjects with or without KRAS mutations. No difference was observed in RR. Hazard ratio (HR) of PFS for pemetrexed treated subjects with G12C mutation compared to subjects with KRAS wild type was 1.96 (95% confidential interval [CI], 1.01 to 3.79; = 0.045), but other mutations failed to show clinical significance. By analysis done by PFS, compared to the subjects with transition mutation, HR was 1.48 (95% CI, 0.64 to 3.40; = 0.360) for subjects with transversion mutation on pemetrexed treatment and 0.41 (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.87; = 0.020) for subjects treated with gemcitabine based chemotherapy. No difference was observed in OS.
In this study, different drug sensitivity was observed according to the type of KRAS mutation. NSCLC subpopulations with different KRAS mutation type should be considered as different subgroups and optimal chemotherapy regimens should be searched in further confirmative studies.
背景/目的:KRAS突变及其突变类型在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中的预测和预后价值存在争议。本临床研究旨在探讨KRAS突变及其突变类型对培美曲塞和吉西他滨为基础的治疗的预测价值。
对检测KRAS突变的晚期NSCLC患者(n = 334)进行回顾性分析,纳入252例表皮生长因子受体野生型且无间变性淋巴瘤激酶融合的患者进行分析。45例患者观察到KRAS突变,突变类型如下:G12C(n = 13)、G12D(n = 12)、G12V(n = 12)、其他(n = 8)。分析培美曲塞单药及吉西他滨为基础的化疗的缓解率(RR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。
KRAS突变患者与未突变患者在年龄、性别、体能状态方面均衡良好。RR未观察到差异。培美曲塞治疗的G12C突变患者与KRAS野生型患者相比,PFS的风险比(HR)为1.96(95%置信区间[CI],1.01至3.79;P = 0.045),但其他突变未显示出临床意义。通过PFS分析,培美曲塞治疗的颠换突变患者与转换突变患者相比,HR为1.48(95% CI,0.64至3.40;P = 0.360),吉西他滨为基础的化疗患者HR为0.41(95% CI,0.19至0.87;P = 0.020)。OS未观察到差异。
本研究中,根据KRAS突变类型观察到不同的药物敏感性。不同KRAS突变类型的NSCLC亚群应被视为不同亚组,应在进一步的验证性研究中寻找最佳化疗方案。