Zilkens Renate R, Smith Debbie A, Phillips Maureen A, Mukhtar S Aqif, Semmens James B, Kelly Maire C
Centre for Population Health Research, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Sexual Assault Resource Centre, Women and Newborn Health Service, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.
Forensic Sci Int. 2017 Jun;275:195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.03.013. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
To describe the frequency of genital and anal injury and associated demographic and assault characteristics in women alleging sexual assault.
Cross-sectional study.
Sexual Assault Resource Centre (SARC), Western Australia.
Total of 1266 women attending SARC from Jan-2009 to Mar-2015.
Women underwent a standardised data collection procedure by forensically trained doctors. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed.
(1) Frequency of genital and anal injuries by type of sexual assault. (2) Identification of independent factors associated with genital and anal injuries following, respectively, completed vaginal and anal penetration.
Genital injury was observed in 24.5% of all women with reported completed vaginal penetration; in a subset with no prior sexual intercourse 52.1% had genital injury. Genital injury was more likely with no prior sexual intercourse (adjusted odds ratio [adj. OR] 4.4, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 2.4-8.0), multiple types of penetrants (adj. OR 1.5, 95%CI 1.0-2.1), if general body injury present and less likely with sedative use and delayed examination. Anal injury, observed in 27.0% of reported completed anal penetrations, was more likely with multiple types of penetrants (adjusted OR 5.0, 95%CI 1.2-21.0), if general body injury present and less likely with delayed examination.
This study separately quantifies the frequency of both genital and anal injuries in sexually assaulted women. Genital injuries were absent in a large proportion of women regardless of prior vaginal intercourse status. It is anticipated that findings will better inform the community, police and medico-legal evidence to the criminal justice system.
描述声称遭受性侵犯的女性生殖器和肛门损伤的发生率以及相关的人口统计学和袭击特征。
横断面研究。
西澳大利亚性侵犯资源中心(SARC)。
2009年1月至2015年3月期间在SARC就诊的1266名女性。
女性接受了经过法医培训的医生进行的标准化数据收集程序。进行了多变量逻辑回归分析。
(1)按性侵犯类型划分的生殖器和肛门损伤发生率。(2)分别确定与完成阴道和肛门插入后生殖器和肛门损伤相关的独立因素。
在所有报告有完成阴道插入的女性中,24.5%观察到生殖器损伤;在没有过先前性交的子集中,52.1%有生殖器损伤。没有过先前性交时生殖器损伤更常见(调整后的优势比[adj. OR]为4.4,95%置信区间[95%CI]为2.4 - 8.0),有多种类型的插入物时更常见(adj. OR为1.5,95%CI为1.0 - 2.1),如果存在全身损伤则更常见,而使用镇静剂和延迟检查时则不太常见。在报告有完成肛门插入的女性中,27.0%观察到肛门损伤,有多种类型的插入物时更常见(调整后的OR为5.0,95%CI为1.2 - 21.0),如果存在全身损伤则更常见,而延迟检查时则不太常见。
本研究分别量化了性侵犯女性生殖器和肛门损伤的发生率。无论先前的阴道性交状况如何,很大一部分女性没有生殖器损伤。预计这些发现将为社区、警方和刑事司法系统的法医证据提供更好的信息。