Lu Jia-Wei, Zhang Sukun, Hai Jing, Lei Ming
South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Guangzhou 510655, China.
South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Guangzhou 510655, China.
Waste Manag. 2017 Nov;69:170-186. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.04.014. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
With the rapid expansion of municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration, the applicability, technical status, and future improvement of MSW incineration attract much attention in China. This paper aims to be a sensible response, with the aid of a comparison between China and some representative developed regions including the EU, the U.S., Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan area. A large number of up-to-date data and information are collected to quantitatively and impartially support the comparison, which covers a wider range of key points including spatial distribution, temporal evolution, technologies, emissions, and perspectives. Analysis results show that MSW incineration is not an outdated choice; however, policy making should prevent the potentially insufficient utilization of MSW incinerators. The structure of MSW incineration technologies is changing in China. The ratio of plants using fluidized bed is decreasing due to various realistic reasons. Decision-makers would select suitable combustion technologies by comprehensive assessments, rather than just by costs. Air pollution control systems are improved with the implementation of China's new emission standard. However, MSW incineration in China is currently blamed for substandard emissions. The reasons include the particular elemental compositions of Chinese MSW, the lack of operating experience, deficient fund for compliance with the emission standard, and the lack of reliable supervisory measures. Some perspectives and suggestions from both technical and managerial aspects are given for the compliance with the emission standard. This paper can provide strategic enlightenments for MSW management in China and other developing countries.
随着城市生活垃圾焚烧规模的迅速扩大,城市生活垃圾焚烧的适用性、技术现状及未来改进方向在中国备受关注。本文旨在通过对比中国与欧盟、美国、日本、韩国以及台湾地区等一些具有代表性的发达地区,做出合理回应。收集了大量最新数据和信息,以定量、客观地支持此次对比,涵盖空间分布、时间演变、技术、排放及展望等更广泛的要点。分析结果表明,城市生活垃圾焚烧并非过时之选;然而,政策制定应防止城市生活垃圾焚烧炉潜在的利用不足情况。中国城市生活垃圾焚烧技术结构正在发生变化。由于各种现实原因,采用流化床技术的工厂比例在下降。决策者将通过综合评估而非仅依据成本来选择合适的燃烧技术。随着中国新排放标准的实施,空气污染控制系统得到改进。然而,中国目前的城市生活垃圾焚烧因排放不达标而受到指责。原因包括中国城市生活垃圾特殊的元素组成、缺乏运营经验、达标排放资金不足以及缺乏可靠的监管措施。从技术和管理两方面给出了一些关于达标排放的观点和建议。本文可为中国及其他发展中国家的城市生活垃圾管理提供战略启示。