• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科延迟转入重症监护病房对脓毒症治疗结果及脓毒症治疗方案依从性的影响。

Impact of Delayed Admission to the Intensive Care Unit from the Emergency Department upon Sepsis Outcomes and Sepsis Protocol Compliance.

作者信息

Agustin Michael, Price Lori Lyn, Andoh-Duku Augustine, LaCamera Peter

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.

Guam Regional Medical City, Dededo, GU, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Res Pract. 2017;2017:9616545. doi: 10.1155/2017/9616545. Epub 2017 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1155/2017/9616545
PMID:28409028
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5376419/
Abstract

. The impact of emergency department length of stay (EDLOS) upon sepsis outcomes needs clarification. We sought to better understand the relationship between EDLOS and both outcomes and protocol compliance in sepsis. . We performed a retrospective observational study of septic patients admitted to the ICU from the ED between January 2012 and December 2015 in a single tertiary care teaching hospital. 287 patients with severe sepsis and septic shock were included. Study population was divided into patients with EDLOS < 6 hrs (early admission) versus ≥6 hours (delayed admission). We assessed the impact of EDLOS on hospital mortality, compliance with sepsis protocol, and resuscitation. Statistical significance was determined by chi-square test. . Of the 287 septic ED patients, 137 (47%) were admitted to the ICU in <6 hours. There was no significant in-hospital mortality difference between early and delayed admissions ( = 0.68). Both groups have similar compliance with the 3-hour protocol ( = 0.77). There was no significant difference in achieving optimal resuscitation within 12 hours ( = 0.35). . We found that clinical outcomes were not significantly different between early and delayed ICU admissions. Additionally, EDLOS did not impact compliance with the sepsis protocol with the exception of repeat lactate draw.

摘要

急诊科住院时间(EDLOS)对脓毒症治疗结果的影响尚需阐明。我们试图更好地了解脓毒症患者的EDLOS与治疗结果及方案依从性之间的关系。我们对2012年1月至2015年12月期间在一家三级护理教学医院从急诊科收治入重症监护病房(ICU)的脓毒症患者进行了一项回顾性观察研究。纳入了287例严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者。研究人群分为EDLOS<6小时(早期入院)和≥6小时(延迟入院)的患者。我们评估了EDLOS对医院死亡率、脓毒症方案依从性及复苏情况的影响。采用卡方检验确定统计学意义。在287例脓毒症急诊科患者中,137例(47%)在<6小时内被收治入ICU。早期和延迟入院患者的院内死亡率无显著差异(P = 0.68)。两组对3小时方案的依从性相似(P = 0.77)。在12小时内实现最佳复苏的情况无显著差异(P = 0.35)。我们发现,早期和延迟入住ICU患者的临床结果无显著差异。此外,除了重复乳酸检测外,EDLOS并未影响脓毒症方案的依从性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30d5/5376419/648a48225d6c/CCRP2017-9616545.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30d5/5376419/648a48225d6c/CCRP2017-9616545.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30d5/5376419/648a48225d6c/CCRP2017-9616545.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Delayed Admission to the Intensive Care Unit from the Emergency Department upon Sepsis Outcomes and Sepsis Protocol Compliance.急诊科延迟转入重症监护病房对脓毒症治疗结果及脓毒症治疗方案依从性的影响。
Crit Care Res Pract. 2017;2017:9616545. doi: 10.1155/2017/9616545. Epub 2017 Mar 12.
2
Prolonged length of stay in the emergency department and increased risk of hospital mortality in patients with sepsis requiring ICU admission.需要入住 ICU 的脓毒症患者在急诊停留时间延长与住院死亡率升高有关。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Feb;36(2):82-87. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-208032. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
3
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department length of stay and clinical outcomes of patients with severe pneumonia: A single-center observational study.COVID-19 大流行对重症肺炎患者急诊住院时间和临床结局的影响:一项单中心观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 23;101(38):e30633. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030633.
4
Effect of an emergency department sepsis protocol on the care of septic patients admitted to the intensive care unit.急诊脓毒症处理方案对 ICU 收治脓毒症患者的护理效果。
CJEM. 2010 Sep;12(5):414-20. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500012562.
5
Resuscitation Resident Impact in the Treatment of Sepsis.复苏住院医师在脓毒症治疗中的影响。
Cureus. 2020 Jul 18;12(7):e9257. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9257.
6
Intensive care unit admission from the emergency department in the setting of National Emergency Access Targets.在国家紧急准入目标背景下,从急诊科转入重症监护病房。
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Jun 30;25(2):84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.05.005. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Impact of Compliance with a Sepsis Resuscitation Bundle in a Portuguese Emergency Department.葡萄牙急诊科中脓毒症复苏集束化治疗依从性的影响
Acta Med Port. 2016 Feb;29(2):88-94. doi: 10.20344/amp.6998. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
8
Association between emergency department length of stay and outcome of patients admitted either to a ward, intensive care or high dependency unit.急诊停留时间与病房、重症监护或高依赖单位收治患者结局的关系。
Emerg Med Australas. 2013 Feb;25(1):46-54. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12021. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
9
The impact of intensive care unit admissions following early resuscitation on the outcome of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.早期复苏后入住重症监护病房对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者预后的影响。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Jan;97 Suppl 1:S69-76.
10
Time Spent in the Emergency Department and Outcomes in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者在急诊科的停留时间及预后
Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2018 Apr/Jun;40(2):94-103. doi: 10.1097/TME.0000000000000188.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of Mortality in Medical ICU Patients: A Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Care Center in Jordan.约旦一家三级医疗中心内科重症监护病房患者死亡率的预测因素:一项回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 7;14(12):4039. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124039.
2
Emergency critical care: closing the gap between onset of critical illness and intensive care unit admission.急诊重症监护:弥合危重病发作与重症监护病房收治之间的差距。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024 Dec;136(23-24):651-661. doi: 10.1007/s00508-024-02374-w. Epub 2024 May 16.
3
Care of the critically ill begins in the emergency medicine setting.

本文引用的文献

1
Emergency Department Length of Stay for Critical Care Admissions. A Population-based Study.重症监护病房收治患者的急诊科住院时间。一项基于人群的研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Aug;13(8):1324-32. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201511-773OC.
2
Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock.早期目标导向性复苏治疗脓毒性休克的试验。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1301-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500896. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
3
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5-year study.拯救脓毒症运动:一项为期7.5年的研究中绩效指标与结果之间的关联
危重症患者的护理始于急诊医学环境。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2024 Jun 1;31(3):165-168. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001134. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
4
Association Between the Emergency Department Length of Stay and in-Hospital Mortality: A Retrospective Cohort Study.急诊科留观时间与住院死亡率之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
Open Access Emerg Med. 2023 Sep 13;15:313-323. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S415971. eCollection 2023.
5
The Association Between Time From Emergency Department Visit to ICU Admission and Mortality in Patients With Sepsis.脓毒症患者从急诊科就诊到入住重症监护病房的时间与死亡率之间的关联
Crit Care Explor. 2023 May 9;5(5):e0915. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000915. eCollection 2023 May.
6
Length-of-Stay in the Emergency Department and In-Hospital Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.急诊科留观时间与院内死亡率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 21;12(1):32. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010032.
7
Predictive Performance of the NEWS‒Lactate and NEWS Towards Mortality or Need for Critical Care Among Patients with Suspicion of Sepsis in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Observational Study.急诊疑似脓毒症患者中NEWS-乳酸评分与NEWS对死亡率或重症监护需求的预测性能:一项前瞻性观察研究
Open Access Emerg Med. 2022 Nov 17;14:619-631. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S382752. eCollection 2022.
8
Prolonged stay of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage patients in the emergency department is correlated with worse outcomes.自发性颅内出血患者在急诊科的停留时间延长与更差的预后相关。
World J Emerg Med. 2022;13(3):222-225. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2022.043.
9
Emergency Department Boarding of Mechanically Ventilated Patients.机械通气患者在急诊科的滞留
Cureus. 2022 Apr 9;14(4):e23990. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23990. eCollection 2022 Apr.
10
Association between pre-intensive care unit (ICU) hospital length of stay and ICU outcomes in a resource-limited setting.资源有限环境下重症监护病房(ICU)前住院时长与ICU治疗结果之间的关联。
South Afr J Crit Care. 2021 Dec 31;37(3). doi: 10.7196/SAJCC.2021.v37i3.500. eCollection 2021.
Crit Care Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):3-12. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000723.
4
Timing of vasopressor initiation and mortality in septic shock: a cohort study.脓毒性休克中血管升压药起始使用时间与死亡率的队列研究
Crit Care. 2014 May 12;18(3):R97. doi: 10.1186/cc13868.
5
Empiric antibiotic treatment reduces mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock from the first hour: results from a guideline-based performance improvement program.经验性抗生素治疗从第一小时起即可降低严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的死亡率:基于指南的绩效改进项目结果
Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):1749-55. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000330.
6
A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock.一项基于方案的早期脓毒性休克护理的随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2014 May 1;370(18):1683-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1401602. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
7
High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock.严重脓毒症及脓毒性休克患者的血压目标:高与低之比较
N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 24;370(17):1583-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1312173. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
8
The Australasian Resuscitation in Sepsis Evaluation (ARISE) trial statistical analysis plan.《澳大利亚脓毒症复苏评估(ARISE)试验统计分析计划》。
Crit Care Resusc. 2013 Sep;15(3):162-71.
9
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.拯救脓毒症运动:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南,2012 年。
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Feb;39(2):165-228. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
10
Severe sepsis in do-not-resuscitate patients: intervention and mortality rates.对放弃心肺复苏患者的严重脓毒症:干预措施及死亡率
J Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;44(4):742-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.09.034. Epub 2012 Dec 21.