Rosario Deepti Pinto, Abraham Anuja, Rathore Swati, Benjamin Santosh Joseph, Jeyaseelan Visalakshi, Mathews Jiji Elizabeth
1 Registrar, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Trop Doct. 2017 Oct;47(4):312-316. doi: 10.1177/0049475517703279. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
An assessment of the efficacy and satisfaction of women in active labour having digital cervical stretching compared to women who did not have this intervention. Ours was a randomised controlled trial at a tertiary centre in India. Low-risk women at term with vertex presentation in active labour with ruptured membranes and cervical dilation of 4-6 cm were included. Stretching to delivery interval was 247.5 ± 158.2 min in the intervention group and 265.5 ± 158.4 in the control group. The mode of delivery, incidence of cervical tear, and maternal, fetal and neonatal complications were similar in both groups. The Labour and Delivery Satisfaction Index (LADSI) was similar in both groups. While no significant discomfort was perceived with stretching, it does not appear to expedite labour.
对正在分娩的产妇进行数字式宫颈扩张与未接受该干预措施的产妇的疗效及满意度评估。我们在印度一家三级中心进行了一项随机对照试验。纳入了足月、单胎头先露、胎膜已破且宫颈扩张4 - 6厘米的低风险活跃期分娩女性。干预组从扩张至分娩的间隔时间为247.5±158.2分钟,对照组为265.5±158.4分钟。两组的分娩方式、宫颈撕裂发生率以及母体、胎儿和新生儿并发症情况相似。两组的分娩与分娩满意度指数(LADSI)相似。虽然扩张时未感觉到明显不适,但它似乎并未加快产程。