• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

足月胎膜剥脱术的安全性与有效性。

Safety and efficacy of stripping of membranes at term.

作者信息

Gupta R, Vasishta K, Sawhney H, Ray P

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998 Feb;60(2):115-21. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(97)00249-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0020-7292(97)00249-x
PMID:9509948
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of stripping of membranes in initiation of labor and to study its effect on maternal and perinatal morbidity.

METHOD

One-hundred primigravidae with certain gestational dates were randomized at 38 weeks gestation to either receive stripping of membranes or only gentle cervical examination. Cervical swabs were taken before pelvic examination at 38 weeks and again at the onset of labor. Placental membranes were sent for bacteriological study after delivery in all patients.

RESULTS

The mean gestational age, parity and Bishop score were similar in both groups at recruitment. Gestational age at delivery was lower in the study group (38.70 +/- 0.63) compared to the control group. Seventy-two percent of the study group and 8% of the control group had spontaneous onset of labor within 7 days of examination. Labor was induced in one patient (2%) of the study group and 16 patients (32%) of the control group. No statistically significant difference was noted in incidence of premature rupture of membranes (PROM), mode of delivery, intrapartum events and perinatal outcome. No increase in neonatal morbidity was seen in association with this procedure. No patient in the study group had clinical evidence of chorioamnionitis. There was no statistically significant difference in the microbiological flora of both groups.

CONCLUSION

Stripping of the fetal membranes is a safe and efficacious procedure for induction of labor. It decreases the incidence of induction of labor with no increase in incidence of maternal and neonatal morbidity.

摘要

目的

评估剥膜术在引产中的疗效,并研究其对孕产妇及围产儿发病率的影响。

方法

100例孕周确定的初产妇在妊娠38周时随机分组,一组接受剥膜术,另一组仅接受轻柔的宫颈检查。在妊娠38周进行盆腔检查前及临产时分别采集宫颈拭子。所有患者分娩后将胎盘胎膜送去做细菌学研究。

结果

两组入组时的平均孕周、产次及 Bishop 评分相似。研究组的分娩孕周低于对照组(38.70±0.63)。研究组72%的患者及对照组8%的患者在检查后7天内自然临产。研究组1例患者(2%)及对照组16例患者(32%)需要引产。胎膜早破(PROM)的发生率、分娩方式、产时情况及围产儿结局方面未观察到统计学上的显著差异。该操作未导致新生儿发病率增加。研究组中无患者有绒毛膜羊膜炎的临床证据。两组的微生物菌群无统计学上的显著差异。

结论

剥膜术是一种安全有效的引产方法。它降低了引产的发生率,且未增加孕产妇及新生儿发病率。

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of stripping of membranes at term.足月胎膜剥脱术的安全性与有效性。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998 Feb;60(2):115-21. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(97)00249-x.
2
The role of membrane stripping in prevention of post-term pregnancy: a randomised clinical trial in Ile-lfe, Nigeria.膜剥脱术在预防过期妊娠中的作用:尼日利亚伊莱-伊费的一项随机临床试验
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 May;22(3):283-6. doi: 10.1080/01443610220130571.
3
Effect of membrane sweeping at term pregnancy on duration of pregnancy and labor induction: a randomized trial.足月妊娠时人工破膜对妊娠持续时间和引产的影响:一项随机试验
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2006;62(1):41-4. doi: 10.1159/000091842. Epub 2006 Mar 3.
4
Does sweeping of membranes beyond 40 weeks reduce the need for formal induction of labour?超过40周进行胎膜剥离是否会减少正式引产的必要性?
BJOG. 2002 Jun;109(6):632-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01193.x.
5
Stretching of the cervix and stripping of the membranes at term: a randomised controlled study.足月时宫颈扩张及胎膜剥脱:一项随机对照研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996 Jun;66(2):129-32. doi: 10.1016/0301-2115(96)02405-0.
6
Residual amniotic fluid volume in preterm rupture of membranes: association with fetal presentation and incidence of clinical and histologic evidence of infection.胎膜早破时羊水残余量:与胎儿先露及感染的临床和组织学证据发生率的关联
Am J Perinatol. 1997 Mar;14(3):125-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994111.
7
Stripping of membranes as a safe method to reduce prolonged pregnancies.胎膜剥脱术作为一种减少过期妊娠的安全方法。
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jun;87(6):927-31. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00046-4.
8
The effectiveness of sweeping membranes at term: a randomized trial.
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Apr;89(4):586-90. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00004-5.
9
A randomized controlled trial of membrane stripping at term to promote labor.一项足月胎膜剥脱术促进分娩的随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 May;87(5 Pt 1):767-70. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00015-4.
10
The relationship of the subtypes of preterm birth with retinopathy of prematurity.早产亚型与早产儿视网膜病变的关系。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;217(3):354.e1-354.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.029. Epub 2017 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Membrane sweeping in term pregnancy to promote spontaneous labor and prevent post-term pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.足月妊娠时行人工剥膜以促进自然分娩并预防过期妊娠:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Sep 24;25(1):940. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-08098-7.
2
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.人工破膜引产
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 27;2(2):CD000451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000451.pub3.
3
Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
引产的使用与剖宫产风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
CMAJ. 2014 Jun 10;186(9):665-73. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130925. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
4
Randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks.随机临床试验评估 39 周时宫颈条件不佳行胎膜剥膜术的频率。
Int J Womens Health. 2011;3:287-94. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S23436. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
5
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.人工破膜引产
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;2005(1):CD000451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000451.pub2.